Download PDF
Semin Hear 2023; 44(03): 261-273
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769621
Review Article

The Modern Hearing Care Landscape: Toward the Provision of Personalized, Dynamic, and Adaptive Care

Danielle Glista
1   School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
2   National Centre for Audiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
,
Jean Anne Schnittker
3   Sonova AG, Stäfa, Switzerland
,
Sophie Brice
4   Australian Institute of Health Service Management, COBE, University of Tasmania, Australia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

New technologies and developments in hearing healthcare are rapidly transforming service models, delivery channels, and available solutions. These advances are reshaping the ways in which care is provided, leading to greater personalization, service efficiencies, and improved access to care, to name a few benefits. Connected hearing care is one model with the potential to embrace this “customized” hearing experience by forging a hybrid of health–technology connections, as well as traditional face-to-face interactions between clients, providers, and persons integral to the care journey. This article will discuss the many components of connected care, encompassing variations of traditional and teleaudiology-focused services, clinic-based and direct-to-consumer channels, in addition to the varying levels of engagement and readiness defining the touch points for clients to access a continuum of connected hearing care. The emerging hearing healthcare system is one that is dynamic and adaptive, allowing for personalized care, but also shifting the focus to the client's needs and preferences. This shift in the care model, largely driven by innovation and the growing opportunities for clients to engage with hearing technology, brings forth new, exciting, and sometimes uncomfortable discussion points for both the provider and client. The modern hearing care landscape benefits clients to better meet their needs and preferences in a more personalized style, and providers to better support and address those needs and preferences.

Keywords

connected hearing care - audiology - teleaudiology - person-centered


Publication History

Article published online:
06 June 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Rogers C. On Becoming a Person: A Therapists View of Psychotherapy. Sentry edition (8). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1961
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Soklaridis S, Ravitz P, Nevo GA, Lieff S. Relationship-centred care in health: a 20-year scoping review. Patient Exp J 2016; 3 (01) 130-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Taylor B. Relationship-Centered Consultation Skills for Audiologists: Remote and in Person Care. Plural publishing; 2021
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Caulfield BM, Donnelly SC. What is connected health and why will it change your practice?. QJM 2013; 106 (08) 703-707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Glista D, Ferguson M, Muñoz K, Davies-Venn E. Connected hearing healthcare: shifting from theory to practice. Int J Audiol 2021; 60 (Suppl. 01) S1-S3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Verhoef PC, Kannan PK, Inman JJ. From multi-channel retailing to omni-channel retailing. J Retailing 2015; 91 (02) 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bennett RJ, Kosovich E, Cohen S. et al. Hearing aid review appointments: attendance and effectiveness. Am J Audiol 2021; 30 (04) 1058-1066
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brice S, Saunders E, Edwards B. Scoping review for a global hearing care framework: matching theory with practice. Semin Hear 2023; 44 (03) 213-231
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Saunders E, Brice S, Alimoradian R. Goldstein and Stephens revisited and extended to a telehealth model of hearing aid optimization. In: Tele-Audiology and the Optimization of Hearing Healthcare Delivery. IGI Global; 2019: 33-62
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Brice S, Almond H. Is teleaudiology achieving person-centered care: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (12) 7436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bennett RJ, Kosovich EM, Stegeman I, Ebrahimi-Madiseh A, Tegg-Quinn S, Eikelboom RH. Investigating the prevalence and impact of device-related problems associated with hearing aid use. Int J Audiol 2020; 59 (08) 615-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Featherston R, Downie LE, Vogel AP, Galvin KL. Decision making biases in the allied health professions: a systematic scoping review. PLoS One 2020; 15 (10) e0240716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ida Institute. Future hearing journeys report. Ida Institute; ; Naerum, Denmark. P31. Accessed June 2022: https://idainstitute.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Future_Hearing_Journeys/Future_Hearing_Journeys_Ida_Institute_2021.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Convery E, Keidser G, Hickson L, Meyer C. The relationship between hearing loss self-management and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction. Am J Audiol 2019; 28 (02) 274-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brice S, Timmer B, Barr C. Centering on people: how hearing healthcare professionals can adapt to consumers' need and outcomes. Semin Hear 2023; 44 (03) 274-286
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gomez R, Habib A, Maidment DW, Ferguson MA. Smartphone-connected hearing aids enable and empower self-management of hearing loss: a qualitative interview study underpinned by the behavior change wheel. Ear Hear 2022; 43 (03) 921-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Angley GP, Schnittker JA, Tharpe AM. Remote hearing aid support: the next frontier. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28 (10) 893-900
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Campos PD, Ferrari DV. Teleaudiology: evaluation of teleconsultation efficacy for hearing aid fitting. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2012; 24 (04) 301-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tao KFM, Moreira TC, Jayakody DMP. et al. Teleaudiology hearing aid fitting follow-up consultations for adults: single blinded crossover randomised control trial and cohort studies. Int J Audiol 2021; 60 (Suppl. 01) S49-S60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Penteado SP, Ramos SdeL, Battistella LR, Marone SA, Bento RF. Remote hearing aid fitting: tele-audiology in the context of Brazilian public policy. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 16 (03) 371-381
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Convery E, Keidser G, McLelland M, Groth J. A smartphone app to facilitate remote patient-provider communication in hearing health care: usability and effect on hearing aid outcomes. Telemed J E Health 2020; 26 (06) 798-804
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Abrams HB, Singh J. Preserving the role of the audiologist in a clinical technology, consumer channel, clinical service model of hearing healthcare. Semin Hear 2023; 44 (03) 302-318
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Beckett RC, Blamey PJ, Saunders S. Optimizing Hearing Aid Utilisation Using Telemedicine Tools. Encyclopedia of E-Health and Telemedicine. IGI Global; 2016: 72-85
    Google Scholar
  • 24 DiFabio DL, O'Hagan R, Glista D. A scoping review of technology and infrastructure needs in the delivery of virtual hearing aid services. Am J Audiol 2022; 31 (02) 411-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kochkin S. A comparison of consumer satisfaction, subjective benefit, and quality of life changes associated with traditional and direct-mail hearing aid use. Hearing Review 2014; 21 (01) 16-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Humes LE, Rogers SE, Quigley TM, Main AK, Kinney DL, Herring C. The effects of service-delivery model and purchase price on hearing-aid outcomes in older adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (01) 53-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Carr G. Using telehealth to engage teenagers. ENT Audiol News 2017; 25 (06) 2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dillon H, Day J, Bant S, Munro KJ. Adoption, use and non-use of hearing aids: a robust estimate based on Welsh national survey statistics. Int J Audiol 2020; 59 (08) 567-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 McCormack A, Fortnum H. Why do people fitted with hearing aids not wear them?. Int J Audiol 2013; 52 (05) 360-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lelic D, Nielsen J, Parker D, Marchman Rønne F. Critical hearing experiences manifest differently across individuals: insights from hearing aid data captured in real-life moments. Int J Audiol 2022; 61 (05) 428-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gatehouse S, Naylor G, Elberling C. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J Audiol 2003; 42 (Suppl. 01) S77-S85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Schafer RM. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Simon and Schuster; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Glista D, O'Hagan R, Cornelisse R. et al. Combining passive and interactive techniques in tracking auditory ecology in hearing aid use. Hearing Review 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Glista D, O'Hagan R, Van Eeckhoutte M, Lai Y, Scollie S. The use of ecological momentary assessment to evaluate real-world aided outcomes with children. Int J Audiol 2021; 60 (Suppl. 01) S68-S78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Humes LE, Rogers SE, Main AK, Kinney DL. The acoustic environments in which older adults wear their hearing aids: insights from datalogging sound environment classification. Am J Audiol 2018; 27 (04) 594-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Muñoz K, Rusk SEP, Nelson L. et al. Pediatric hearing aid management: parent-reported needs for learning support. Ear Hear 2016; 37 (06) 703-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Jensen NS, Hau O, Lelic D, Herrlin P, Wolters F, Smeds K. Evaluation of auditory reality and hearing aids using an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) approach. Paper presented at the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics; September 9–13, 2019; Acachen, Germany
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wu YH, Stangl E, Chipara O, Hasan SS, DeVries S, Oleson J. Efficacy and effectiveness of advanced hearing aid directional and noise reduction technologies for older adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear 2019; 40 (04) 805-822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Timmer BHB, Hickson L, Launer S. The use of ecological momentary assessment in hearing research and future clinical applications. Hear Res 2018; 369: 24-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 von Gablenz P, Kowalk U, Bitzer J, Meis M, Holube I. Individual hearing aid benefit in real life evaluated using ecological momentary assessment. Trends Hear 2021; 25: 2331216521990288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mofsen AM, Rodebaugh TL, Nicol GE, Depp CA, Miller JP, Lenze EJ. When all else fails, listen to the patient: a viewpoint on the use of ecological momentary assessment in clinical trials. JMIR Ment Health 2019; 6 (05) e11845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Swanepoel DW, Hall JW. Making audiology work during COVID-19 and beyond. Hear J 2020; 73 (06) 20-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Rogers EM. Categorizing the adopters of agricultural practices. J Rural Sociology 1958; 23 (04) 346-354
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Saunders E. From the bionic ear to the audiologist in your pocket. In: Byrne N. ; ed Science in Public. 2015. . Accessed June 1, 2023 at: https://www.scienceinpublic.com.au/media-releases/incus-launch
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Hearing Collective Services. Accessed May 20, 2020 at: https://www.hearingcollective.com/services. (See also Penno, Kat. “Wow Woman in Wearabletech: Kathryn 'Kat' Penno, Founder and Audiologist at Hearing Collective.” edited by Marija Butkovic. Women of Wearables, 2020. Accessed May 20, 2020 at: https://www.womenofwearables.com/new-blog/wow-woman-in-wearable-tech-kathryn-penno-hearing-collective
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Blamey PJ, Blamey JK, Saunders E. Effectiveness of a teleaudiology approach to hearing aid fitting. J Telemed Telecare 2015; 21 (08) 474-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Eikelboom RH, Bennett RJ, Brennan M. Tele-audiology: An Opportunity for Expansion of Hearing Healthcare Services in Australia. Ear Science Institute Australia; 2021
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Saunders E. Tele-Audiology and the Optimization of Hearing Healthcare Delivery. IGI Global; 2019
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar