Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Semin Hear 2023; 44(04): 503-520
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769497
Review Article

Evaluation of Low-Frequency Noise, Infrasound, and Health Symptoms at an Administrative Building and Men's Shelter: A Case Study

Sophia K. Chiu
1   Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Scott E. Brueck
1   Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Douglas M. Wiegand
1   Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Hannah L. Free
1   Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Hannah Echt
1   Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding This research received no external funding.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Responses to complaints about low-frequency noise and infrasound at workplaces have not been extensively documented in the literature. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health evaluated low-frequency noise, infrasound, and health symptoms among employees of an organization providing services to homeless persons. The organization's campus was evacuated after two loud noise and vibration incidents related to methane flare on an adjacent landfill. Employees were interviewed about health symptoms, perceptions of noise, and how the incidents were handled. Available medical records were reviewed. Sound level and noise frequency measurements taken in vacated campus buildings not during these incidents revealed overall levels across frequencies up to 100 hertz were 64 to 73 dB, well below those associated with adverse health effects. However, an unbalanced frequency spectrum could have contributed to the unusual sounds or vibrations reported before the first incident. Some symptoms predating the incidents are consistent with low-frequency noise exposure but are also common and nonspecific. Most interviewed employees (57%) reported being uncomfortable returning to work on the campus. Multiple factors such as noise characteristics, health effects, and employee perceptions need to be considered when assessing health concerns related to low-frequency noise and infrasound.

Keywords

noise - octave band analysis - auditory symptoms - vestibular symptoms - psychological contract - risk perception

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent

Health Hazard Evaluations are not considered human subjects research by virtue of NIOSH acting as a public health authority performing a public health investigation as directed by statute. Participants were informed of the purpose of the evaluation, their rights regarding confidentiality, and the voluntary nature of participation. Informed consent was provided verbally.


Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.




Publication History

Article published online:
05 June 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Nowacki G, Mitraszewska I, Kaminski T, Wierzejski A. Research of infrasound noise in heavy goods vehicle and busses. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication. October 2008; 209–215. Accessed May 10, 2023 at: http://www.tsi.lv/sites/default/files/editor/science/Publikacii/ReStat_08/32.pdf
    PubMed
  • 2 Broner N, Leventhall HG. Low frequency noise annoyance assessment by low frequency noise rating (LFNR) curves. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 1983; 2 (01) 20-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Scottish Environment Protection Agency. Guidance on landfill gas flaring. November 2002. Accessed February 25, 2022 at: https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/28988/guidance-on-landfill-gas-flaring.pdf
    PubMed
  • 4 Araújo Alves J, Neto Paiva F, Torres Silva L, Remoaldo P. Low-frequency noise and its main effects on human health—a review of the literature between 2016 and 2019. Appl Sci (Basel) 2020; 10 (15) 5205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Andresen J, Moller H. Equal annoyance contours for infrasonic frequencies. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 1984; 3 (03) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Broner N. The effects of low frequency noise on people—a review. J Sound Vibrat 1978; 58 (04) 483-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Moller H. Physiological and psychological effects of infrasound on humans. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 1984; 3 (01) 1-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M, Dudarewicz A, Waszkowska M, Sliwinska-Kowalska M. Annoyance related to low frequency noise in subjective assessment of workers. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 2009; 28 (01) 1-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Waye KP, Rylander R. The prevalence of annoyance and effects after long-term exposure to low-frequency noise. J Sound Vibrat 2001; 240 (03) 483-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Van Kamp I, van den Berg F. Health effects related to wind turbine sound, including low-frequency sound and infrasound. Acoust Aust 2018; 46: 31-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 van Kamp I, van den Berg F. Health effects related to wind turbine sound: an update. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 (17) 9133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Waye KP. Noise and health - effects of low frequency noise and vibrations: environmental and occupational perspectives. In: Nriagu JO. ed. Encyclopedia of Environmental Health. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011: 240-253
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Leventhall G, Pelmear P, Benton S. A review of published research on low frequency noise and its effects. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; May 2003. Accessed February 25, 2022 at: https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/935y3/a-review-of-published-research-on-low-frequency-noise-and-its-effects
    PubMed
  • 14 Baliatsas C, van Kamp I, van Poll R, Yzermans J. Health effects from low-frequency noise and infrasound in the general population: Is it time to listen? A systematic review of observational studies. Sci Total Environ 2016; 557-558: 163-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Persson Waye K, Bengtsson J, Kjellberg A, Benton S. Low frequency noise “pollution” interferes with performance. Noise Health 2001; 4 (13) 33-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schmidt PM, Flores FdaT, Rossi AG, Silveira AF. Hearing and vestibular complaints during pregnancy. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2010; 76 (01) 29-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bisdorff A, Von Brevern M, Lempert T, Newman-Toker DE. Classification of vestibular symptoms: towards an international classification of vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res 2009; 19 (1-2): 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bisdorff AR, Staab JP, Newman-Toker DE. Overview of the international classification of vestibular disorders. Neurol Clin 2015; 33 (03) 541-550 , vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. 2021 TLVs ® and BEIs ® : Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; 2021
    PubMed
  • 20 Moorhouse AT, Waddington DC, Adams M. Proposed criteria for the assessment of low frequency noise disturbance. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; December 2011. Accessed February 25, 2022 at: https://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/491/1/NANR45-criteria__rev1_23_12_2011_(2).pdf
    PubMed
  • 21 Shehap AM, Shawky HA, El-Basheer TM. Study and assessment of low frequency noise in occupational settings. Arch Acoust 2016; 41 (01) 151-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Integrated Laboratory Systems. Infrasound: brief review of toxicological literature. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences contract no. N01-ES-65402. November 2001. Accessed February 25, 2022 at: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/chem_background/exsumpdf/infrasound_508.pdf
    PubMed
  • 23 Storm R. Health risks due to exposure of low-frequency noise. Dissertation. Orebro University, School of Science and Technology; 2009. Accessed February 25, 2022 at: http://www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:273045/FULLTEXT01.pdf
    PubMed
  • 24 Kawano A, Yamaguchi H, Funasaka S. Effects of infrasound on humans: a questionnaire survey of 145 drivers of long distance transport trucks. Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel) 1991; 84 (09) 1315-1324
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ascone L, Kling C, Wieczorek J, Koch C, Kühn S. A longitudinal, randomized experimental pilot study to investigate the effects of airborne infrasound on human mental health, cognition, and brain structure. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 3190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Broner N. A simple criterion for low frequency emission assessment. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 2010; 29 (01) 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Michaud DS, Feder K, Keith SE. et al. Exposure to wind turbine noise: Perceptual responses and reported health effects. J Acoust Soc Am 2016; 139 (03) 1443-1454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Earshen J. Sound measurement: instrumentation and noise descriptors. In: Berger EH, Royster LH, Royster JD. eds. The Noise Manual. 5th rev. ed.. American Industrial Hygiene Association; 2003: 69-72
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Kjellberg A, Tesarz M, Holmberg K, Landström U. Evaluation of frequency-weighted sound level measurements for prediction of low-frequency noise annoyance. Environ Int 1997; 23 (04) 519-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Downey G, Parnell J. Assessing low frequency noise from industry – a practical approach. Paper presented at: 12th ICBEN Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem; June 18–22, 2017; Zurich, Switzerland. Accessed February 25, 2022 at: http://www.icben.org/2017/ICBEN%202017%20Papers/SubjectArea10_Downey_1016_3656.pdf
    PubMed
  • 31 Takigawa H, Hayashi F, Sugiura S, Sakamoto H. Effects of infrasound on human body sway. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 1988; 7 (02) 66-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Morrison EW, Robinson SL. When employees feel betrayed: a model of how psychological contract violation develops. Acad Manage Rev 1997; 22 (01) 26-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Rousseau DM. Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Sage Publications; 1995
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Shen Y, Schaubroeck JM, Zhao L, Wu L. Work group climate and behavioral responses to psychological contract breach. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Zhao H, Wayne SJ, Glibkowski BC, Bravo J. The impact of psychological breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis. Person Psychol 2007; 60 (03) 647-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar