PDF herunterladen
Semin Liver Dis 2023; 43(02): 176-188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769009
Review Article

Endoscopic Advances in Hepatology

Emma Vanderschueren 
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2   Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging (CHROMETA), Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
Jonel Trebicka 
3   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
4   European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure, Barcelona, Spain
,
Wim Laleman 
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2   Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging (CHROMETA), Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
3   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints


Abstract

Endoscopy is and remains an indispensable tool in diagnosing and managing liver disease and its complications. Due to the progress in advanced endoscopy, endoscopy has become an alternative route for many surgical, percutaneous, and angiographic interventions, not only as a backup tool when conventional interventions fail but increasingly as a first-line choice. The term endo-hepatology refers to the integration of advanced endoscopy in the practice of hepatology. Endoscopy is key in the diagnosis and management of esophageal and gastric varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy, and gastric antral vascular ectasia. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can be used for the evaluation of the liver parenchyma, liver lesions, and surrounding tissues and vessels, including targeted biopsy and complemented with new software functions. Moreover, EUS can guide portal pressure gradient measurement, and assess and help manage complications of portal hypertension. It is crucial that each present-day hepatologist is aware of the (rapidly increasing) full spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic tools that exist within this field. In this comprehensive review, we would like to discuss the current endo-hepatology spectrum, as well as future directions for endoscopy in hepatology.

Keywords

endoscopy - hepatology - endoscopic ultrasound - portal hypertension - varices


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. Mai 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Chang KJ, Samarasena JB, Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Lee JG. Endo-hepatology: a new paradigm. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2012; 22 (02) 379-385 , xi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W. Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007; 46 (03) 922-938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Villanueva C, Albillos A, Genescà J. et al. β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (PREDESCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2019; 393 (10181): 1597-1608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C. Baveno VII Faculty. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2022; 76 (04) 959-974
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Abby Philips C, Sahney A. Oesophageal and gastric varices: historical aspects, classification and grading: everything in one place. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2016; 4 (03) 186-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Calès P, Zabotto B, Meskens C. et al. Gastroesophageal endoscopic features in cirrhosis observer variability, interassociations, and relationship to hepatic dysfunction. Gastroenterology 1990;98(1):156–162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esophageal Varices. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study. N Engl J Med 1988; 319 (15) 983-989
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gralnek IM, Camus Duboc M, Garcia-Pagan JC. et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54 (11) 1094-1120
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Angeli P, Bernardi M, Villanueva C. et al; European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu, European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2018; 69 (02) 406-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Escorsell À, Pavel O, Cárdenas A. et al; Variceal Bleeding Study Group. Esophageal balloon tamponade versus esophageal stent in controlling acute refractory variceal bleeding: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2016; 63 (06) 1957-1967
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hwang JH, Shergill AK, Acosta RD. et al; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80 (02) 221-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shaheen NJ, Stuart E, Schmitz SM. et al. Pantoprazole reduces the size of postbanding ulcers after variceal band ligation: a randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2005; 41 (03) 588-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sarin SK, Lahoti D, Saxena SP, Murthy NS, Makwana UK. Prevalence, classification and natural history of gastric varices: a long-term follow-up study in 568 portal hypertension patients. Hepatology 1992; 16 (06) 1343-1349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mohan BP, Chandan S, Khan SR. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy versus direct endoscopic glue injection therapy for gastric varices: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2020; 52 (04) 259-267
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Laleman W, Vanderschueren E, Van der Merwe S, Chang KJ. The use of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 60-61: 101811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hu Z, Zhang D, Swai J, Liu T, Liu S. Risk of rebleeding from gastroesophageal varices after initial treatment with cyanoacrylate; a systematic review and pooled analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20 (01) 181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tseng Y, Ma L, Luo T. et al. Thromboembolic events secondary to endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection: Can we foresee any red flags?. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 2018: 1940592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Laleman W. Role of endoscopy in hepatology. In: Cardenas A, Samuel D, Terrault N. eds. ILC Postgraduate Course. EASL; 2022. :24–36
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Lesmana CRA, Paramitha MS, Gani RA, Lesmana LA. The role of endoscopic ultrasound for portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis. J Med Ultrason 2022; 49 (03) 359-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kim DJ, Darcy MD, Mani NB. et al. Modified balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) techniques for the treatment of gastric varices: vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO)/coil-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (CARTO)/balloon-occluded antegrade transvenous obliteration (BATO). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41 (06) 835-847
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gjeorgjievski M, Cappell MS. Portal hypertensive gastropathy: a systematic review of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, natural history and therapy. World J Hepatol 2016; 8 (04) 231-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rajabnia M, Hatami B, Ketabi Moghadam P. et al. Comparison of portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastric antral vascular ectasia: an update. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2022; 15 (03) 204-218
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Peng M, Guo X, Yi F. et al. Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2021;12:20406223211039696
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 McCarty TR, Hathorn KE, Chan WW, Jajoo K. Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9 (07) E1145-E1157
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chalhoub JM, Umar J, Groudan K, Hamadeh N, Desilets DJ, Greeff Y. Endoscopic band ligation compared to thermal therapy for gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9 (02) 150-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hirsch BS, Ribeiro IB, Funari MP. et al. Endoscopic band ligation versus argon plasma coagulation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Endosc 2021; 54 (05) 669-677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tsujino T, Samarasena JB, Chang KJ. EUS anatomy of the liver segments. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7 (04) 246-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Campos S, Poley JW, van Driel L, Bruno MJ. The role of EUS in diagnosis and treatment of liver disorders. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7 (10) E1262-E1275
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Awad SS, Fagan S, Abudayyeh S, Karim N, Berger DH, Ayub K. Preoperative evaluation of hepatic lesions for the staging of hepatocellular and metastatic liver carcinoma using endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Surg 2002; 184 (06) 601-604 , discussion 604–605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Fujii-Lau LL, Abu Dayyeh BK, Bruno MJ. et al. EUS-derived criteria for distinguishing benign from malignant metastatic solid hepatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81 (05) 1188-96.e1 , 7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dhar J, Samanta J. The expanding role of endoscopic ultrasound elastography. Clin J Gastroenterol 2022; 15 (05) 841-858
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lisotti A, Serrani M, Caletti G, Fusaroli P. EUS liver assessment using contrast agents and elastography. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7 (04) 252-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sandulescu L, Padureanu V, Dumitrescu C. et al. Original paper: a pilot study of real time elastography in the differentiation of focal liver lesions. Curr Health Sci J 2012;38(01):32–35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 D'Onofrio M, Crosara S, De Robertis R, Canestrini S, Mucelli RP. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of focal liver lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205 (01) W56-W66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Chantarojanasiri T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: elastography or contrast-enhanced harmonic alone versus the combination. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5 (11) E1136-E1143
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Dhar J, Samanta J. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the field of hepatology: recent advances and future trends. World J Hepatol 2021; 13 (11) 1459-1483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Marc B, Monino L, Rimbas M. EUS-guided intra-tumoral therapies. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 60-61: 101817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 McCarty TR, Bazarbashi AN, Njei B, Ryou M, Aslanian HR, Muniraj T. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided, percutaneous, and transjugular liver biopsy: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endosc 2020; 53 (05) 583-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Diehl DL. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2019; 29 (02) 173-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Castera L, Yuen Chan HL, Arrese M. et al; European Association for Study of Liver, Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado. EASL-ALEH clinical practice guidelines: non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol 2015; 63 (01) 237-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mohan BP, Shakhatreh M, Garg R, Ponnada S, Adler DG. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89 (02) 238-246.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Zeng K, Jiang Z, Yang J, Chen K, Lu Q. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57 (05) 545-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Pouw R, Barret M, Biermann K. et al. Endoscopic tissue sampling – Part 1: Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary tracts. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53 (11) 1174-1188
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Mok SRS, Diehl DL, Johal AS. et al. A prospective pilot comparison of wet and dry heparinized suction for EUS-guided liver biopsy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88 (06) 919-925
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Kohli DR, Mettman D, Andraws N. et al. Comparative accuracy of endosonographic shear wave elastography and transcutaneous liver stiffness measurement: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97 (01) 35-41.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ma J, Gong X, Luo J. et al. Impact of intrahepatic venovenous shunt on hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (12) 2081-2088
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Lai L, Poneros J, Santilli J, Brugge W. EUS-guided portal vein catheterization and pressure measurement in an animal model: a pilot study of feasibility. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59 (02) 280-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Huang JY, Samarasena JB, Tsujino T. et al. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85 (05) 996-1001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Samarasena JB, Huang JY, Tsujino T. et al. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study. VideoGIE 2018; 3 (11) 361-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Zhang W, Peng C, Zhang S. et al. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93 (03) 565-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Hajifathalian K, Westerveld D, Kaplan A. et al. Simultaneous EUS-guided portosystemic pressure measurement and liver biopsy sampling correlate with clinically meaningful outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95 (04) 703-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Choi AY, Chang KJ, Samarasena JB. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided porto-systemic pressure gradient measurement correlates with histological hepatic fibrosis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67 (12) 5685-5692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Lesmana CRA. Technique innovation of endoscopic ultrasound portal pressure gradient measurement using standard manometer set for portal hypertension assessment. Clin Case Rep 2022; 10 (12) e6658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Bick BL, Al-Haddad M, Liangpunsakul S, Ghabril MS, DeWitt JM. EUS-guided fine needle injection is superior to direct endoscopic injection of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate for the treatment of gastric variceal bleeding. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (06) 1837-1845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 McCarty TR, Bazarbashi AN, Hathorn KE, Thompson CC, Ryou M. Combination therapy versus monotherapy for EUS-guided management of gastric varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9 (01) 6-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Robles-Medranda C, Nebel JA, Puga-Tejada M. et al. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided coils plus cyanoacrylate injection compared to endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection in the management of gastric varices. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13 (01) 13-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar