CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2023; 32(01): 184-194
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768719
Section 7: Health Information Exchange
Survey

Health Information Exchange: Understanding the Policy Landscape and Future of Data Interoperability

A Jay Holmgren
1   University of California, San Francisco, USA
,
Moritz Esdar
2   University of Applied Sciences Osnabrueck, Germany
,
Jens Hüsers
2   University of Applied Sciences Osnabrueck, Germany
,
João Coutinho-Almeida
3   Porto University, Portugal
› Author Affiliations

Summary

Objectives: To review recent literature on health information exchange (HIE), focusing on the policy approach of five case study nations: the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Germany, Israel, and Portugal, as well as synthesize lessons learned across countries and provide recommendations for future research.

Methods: A narrative review of each nation’s HIE policy frameworks, current state, and future HIE strategy.

Results: Key themes that emerged include the importance of both central decision-making as well as local innovation, the multiple and complex challenges of broad HIE adoption, and the varying role of HIE across different national health system structures.

Conclusion: HIE is an increasingly important capability and policy priority as electronic health record (EHR) adoption becomes more common and care delivery is increasingly digitized. While all five case study nations have adopted some level of HIE, there are significant differences across their level of data sharing infrastructure and maturity, and each nation took a different policy approach. While identifying generalizable strategies across disparate international systems is challenging, there are several common themes across successful HIE policy frameworks, such as the importance of central government prioritization of data sharing. Finally, we make several recommendations for future research to expand the breadth and depth of the literature on HIE and guide future decision-making by policymakers and practitioners.



Publication History

Article published online:
06 July 2023

© 2023. IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Adler-Milstein J, Jha AK. HITECH Act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Aff (Millwood)2017;36(8):1416–22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1651.
  • 2 Blumenthal D. Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology. N Engl J Med 2009;360(15):14779. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0901592.
  • 3 Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Middleton B. The value of Health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.10.
  • 4 Kyle MA, Frakt AB. Patient administrative burden in the US health care system. Health Serv Res 2012;56(5):755–65. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13861.
  • 5 Holmgren AJ, Apathy NC, Adler-Milstein J. Barriers to Hospital Electronic Public Health Reporting and Implications for the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020;27(8):1306-9. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa112.
  • 6 Ammenwerth E, Duftschmid G, Al-Hamdan Z, Bawadi H, Cheung NT, Cho K-H, et al. International Comparison of Six Basic eHealth Indicators Across 14 Countries: An eHealth Benchmarking Study. Methods Inf Med 2020;59(S 02):e46–e63. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715796.
  • 7 Payne JH, Lovis C, Gutteridge C, Pagliari C, Natarajan S, Yong C, et al. Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries. J Glob Health 2019;9(2):0204279. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020427.
  • 8 Adler-Milstein J, Pfeifer E. Information Blocking: Is It Occurring and What Policy Strategies Can Address It? Milbank Q 2017;95(1):117–35. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12247.
  • 9 Downing K, Mason J. ONC Targets Information Blocking. J AHIMA 2015;86(7):36–8.
  • 10 Liyanage H, Krause P, de Lusignan S. Using ontologies to improve semantic interoperability in health data. J Innov Health Inform 2015;22(2). doi: 10.14236/jhi.v22i2.159.
  • 11 de Mello BH, Rigo SJ, da Costa CA, da Rosa Righi R, Donida B, Rosecler Bez M, et al. Semantic interoperability in health records standards: a systematic literature review. Health Technol (Berl) 2022;12(2):255–72. doi: 10.1007/s12553-022-00639-w.
  • 12 Akhlaq A, Sheikh A, Pagliari C. Defining health information exchange: scoping review of published definitions. J Innov Health Inform 2017;23(4) doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i4.838.
  • 13 Sarkar N. Transforming Health Data to Actionable Information: Recent Progress and Future Opportunities in Health Information Exchange. Yearb Med Inform 2022;31:203–14. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742519.
  • 14 Dixon BE, Holmgren AJ, Adler-Milstein J, Grannis SJ. Health Information Exchange and Interoperability. In: Finnell JT, Dixon BE, editors. Clinical Informatics Study Guide: Text and Review. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 203–19. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-93765-2_14.
  • 15 Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Jha AK. A Survey of Health Information Exchange Organizations in the United States: Implications for Meaningful Use. Ann Intern Med 2011;154(10):666–71. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-154-10-201105170-00006.
  • 16 Adler-Milstein J, Garg A, Zhao W, Patel V. A Survey Of Health Information Exchange Organizations In Advance Of A Nationwide Connectivity Framework. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;40(5):736–44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01497.
  • 17 Gematik, Pressemitteilung | Fakten zur Digitalisierung: TI-Atlas 2022 veröffentlicht | gematik, Oct. 18, 2022. [available at: https://www.gematik.de/presse/pressemitteilung-fakten-zur-digitalisierung-ti-atlas-2022-veroeffentlicht; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 18 Dehling T, Sunyaev A. German Health IT Infrastructure: A Large-Scale Network Alleviating Challenges in Health IT Development. Working Paper, University of Cologne, May 2014. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3315.8566.
  • 19 Holmgren A, Adler-Milstein J. Health Information Exchange in US Hospitals: The Current Landscape and a Path to Improved Information Sharing. J Hosp Med 2017;12(3):193. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2704.
  • 20 Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med 2010;362(5):382–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0912825.
  • 21 Apathy NC, Holmgren AJ, Adler-Milstein J. A decade post-HITECH: Critical access hospitals have electronic health records but struggle to keep up with other advanced functions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;28(9):1947-54. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab102.
  • 22 2020 Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program Scoring Methodology Fact Sheet, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2020. [Available at: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/scoring-methodology-fact-sheet.pdf; accessed Mar. 15, 2023].
  • 23 Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). [Available at: https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ10/PLAW-114publ10.pdf; accessed Mar. 29, 2023].
  • 24 Grossman JM, Kushner KL, November EA. Creating sustainable local health information exchanges: can barriers to stakeholder participation be overcome? Res Brief 2008;2:1-12.
  • 25 Charles D, Swain M, Patel V. Interoperability among U.S. Non-federal Acute Care Hospitals, 2014. ONC Data Brief 2015;25:10.
  • 26 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2022 Report to Congress: Update on the Access, Exchange, and Use of Electronic Health Information, 2022. [Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/page/2023-02/2022_ONC_Report_to_Congress.pdf; accessed Mar. 29, 2023].
  • 27 Holmgren AJ, Everson J, Adler-Milstein J. Association of Hospital Interoperable Data Sharing With Alternative Payment Model Participation. JAMA Health Forum 2002;3(2):e215199–e215199. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.5199.
  • 28 Madhavan S, Bastarache L, Brown JS, Butte AJ, Dorr DA, Embi PJ, et al. Use of electronic health records to support a public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: a perspective from 15 academic medical centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;28(2):393–401. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa287.
  • 29 Reeves JJ, Pageler NM, Wick EC, Melton GB, Gamaliel Tan Y-H, Clay BJ, et al. The Clinical Information Systems Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Yearb Med Inform 2012;30:105–25. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726513.
  • 30 Holmgren AJ, Patel V, Charles D, Adler-Milstein J. US Hospital Engagement in Core Domains of Interoperability. Am J Manag Care 2016;22(12):e395–e402.
  • 31 Holmgren AJ, Patel V, Adler-Milstein J. Progress In Interoperability: Measuring US Hospitals’ Engagement In Sharing Patient Data. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36(10):1820–7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0546.
  • 32 Apath, NC, Vest JR, Adler-Milstein J, Blackburn J, Dixon, BE, Harle CA. Practice and market factors associated with provider volume of health information exchange. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021;28(7):1451–60. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab024.
  • 33 Patel V, Pylypchuk Y, Parasrampuria S, Kachay L. Interoperability among Office-Based Physicians in 2015 and 2017. ONC Data Brief 2019;47:12.
  • 34 Apathy NC, Holmgren AJ. Opt-in consent policies: potential barriers to hospital health information exchange. Am J Manag Care 2020;26(1):e14.
  • 35 Bronsoler A, Doyle J, Schmit C, Van Reenen J. The Role of State Policy in Fostering Health Information Exchange in the United States. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv 2023;4(1). doi: 10.1056/CAT.22.0302.
  • 36 Winden T, Boland L, Frey N, Satterlee P, Hokanson J. Care everywhere, a point-to-point HIE tool: Utilization and impact on patient care in the ED. Appl Clin Inform 2014;5(2):388–401. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0100.
  • 37 Everson J, Butler E. Hospital adoption of multiple health information exchange approaches and information accessibility. J Am Med Inform Assoc:27(4):577–83. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa003.
  • 38 Cross DA, Adler-Milstein J. Investing in Post-Acute Care Transitions: Electronic Information Exchange Between Hospitals and Long-Term Care Facilities. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017;18(1):30–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.024.
  • 39 Lin SC, Hollingsworth JM, Adler-Milstein J. Alternative Payment Models and Hospital Engagement in Health Information Exchange. Am J Manag Care 2019;25(1):e1–e6.
  • 40 Apathy NC, Holmgren AJ, Werner RM. Growth in health information exchange with ACO market penetration. Am J Manag Care 2022;28(1):e7–e13. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88815.
  • 41 Porreca D, Yaraghi N. The Impact of Population Health Analytics on Health Care Quality and Efficacy Among CPC+ Participants. Milbank Memorial Fund; 2022. [Available at: https://www.milbank.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/WNY_Report2.pdf; accessed Mar. 29, 2023].
  • 42 About ONC’s Cures Act Final Rule. [Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/curesrule/overview/about-oncs-cures-act-final-rule; accessed Mar. 15, 2023].
  • 43 Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement | HealthIT.gov, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, May 26, 2020. [Avaialable at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/interoperability/trusted-exchange-framework-and-common-agreement; accessed Mar. 15, 2023].
  • 44 ONC debuts first cohort of qualified networks in TEFCA, including Epic, eHealth Exchange, Healthcare Dive. [Available at: https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/onc-first-cohort-of-qualified-networks-tefca-epic/642654/; accessed Feb. 27, 2023].
  • 45 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) | HealthIT.gov, HealthIT.gov. [Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/interoperability/policy/trusted-exchange-framework-and-common-agreement-tefca; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 46 Bogumil-Uçan S, Klenk T. Varieties of health care digitalization: Comparing advocacy coalitions in Austria and Germany. Rev Policy Res 2021;38(4):478–503. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12435.
  • 47 Müller J, Ullrich C, Poss-Doering R. Beyond Known Barriers—Assessing Physician Perspectives and Attitudes Toward Introducing Open Health Records in Germany: Qualitative Study. J Particip Med 2020;12(4):e19093. doi: 10.2196/19093.
  • 48 Naumann L, Babitsch B, Hübner UH. eHealth policy processes from the stakeholders’ viewpoint: A qualitative comparison between Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Health Policy Technol 2021;10(2):100505. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100505.
  • 49 Naumann L, Esdar M, Ammenwerth E, Baumberger D, Hübner U. Same Goals, Yet Different Outcomes: Analysing the Current State of eHealth Adoption and Policies in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland Using a Mixed Methods Approach. MEDINFO 2019; 2019. p. 1012–6. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190377.
  • 50 Pohlmann S, Kunz A, Ose, D, Winkler EC, Brandner A, Poss-Doering R, et al. Digitalizing Health Services by Implementing a Personal Electronic Health Record in Germany: Qualitative Analysis of Fundamental Prerequisites From the Perspective of Selected Experts, J Med Internet Res 2020 Jan 29;22(1):e15102. doi: 10.2196/15102.
  • 51 EHR and PHR: digital records in the German healthcare system, Mar. 18, 2019. [Available at: https://www.gesundheitsindustrie-bw.de/en/article/news/ehr-and-phr-digital-records-in-the-german-healthcare-system; accessed Feb. 28, 2023].
  • 52 Amelung V, Angelkorte M, Augurzky B, Brauer R, Freigang F, Fritzsche F, et al. Ergebnisse der ersten nationalen Reifegradmessung deutscher Krankenhäuser. DigitalRadar 2022;148. [Available at: https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/service/publikationen/details/digitalradar-zwischenbericht.html; accessed Mar. 29, 2023].
  • 53 Albrecht M, Otten M, Sander M, Temizdemir E, Wichtrup W. PraxisBarometer Digitalisierung 2020. Stand und Perspektiven der Digitalisierung in der vertragsärztlichen und -psychotherapeutischen Versorgung; 2020. [Available at: https://www.iges.com/sites/igesgroup/iges.de/myzms/content/e6/e1621/e10211/e24893/e26423/e26424/e26426/attr_objs26428/IGES_KBV_Digitalbaromenter_2020_ger.pdf; accessed Mar. 29, 2023].
  • 54 Thiel R, Deimel L, Schmidtmann D, Piesche K, Hüsing T, Rennoch J, et al. Gesundheitssystem-Vergleich Fokus Digitalisierung. # SmartHealthSystems Digitalisierungsstrategien im internationalen Vergleich; 2018. [Available at: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/Projekte/Der_digitale_Patient/VV_SHS-Gesamtstudie_dt.pdf; accessed Mar. 29, 2023].
  • 55 Price C, Green W, Suhomlinova O. Twenty-five years of national health IT: exploring strategy, structure, and systems in the English NHS. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019;26(3):188–97. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy162.
  • 56 NHS England - Transformation Directorate. Consent and confidential patient information; Feb. 10, 2023. [Available at: https://transform.england.nhs.uk/information-governance/guidance/consent-and-confidential-patient-information/; accessed Feb. 27, 2023].
  • 57 Justinia T. The UK’s National Programme for IT: Why was it dismantled? Health Serv Manage Res 2017;30(1):2–9. doi: 10.1177/0951484816662492.
  • 58 Warren LR, Clarke J, Arora S, Darzi A. Improving data sharing between acute hospitals in England: an overview of health record system distribution and retrospective observational analysis of inter-hospital transitions of care. BMJ Open 2019;9(12):e031637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031637.
  • 59 NHS England Interoperability. [Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/digitaltechnology/connecteddigitalsystems/interoperability/; accessed Feb. 28, 2023].
  • 60 NHS England - Transformation Directorate. Information Governance Framework: Shared Care Records; Feb. 02, 2022. [Available at: https://transform.england.nhs.uk/information-governance/guidance/summary-of-information-governance-framework-shared-care-records/; accessed Dec. 30, 2022].
  • 61 Zhang J, Sood H, Harrison OT, Horner B, Sharma N, Budhdeo S. Interoperability in NHS hospitals must be improved: the Care Quality Commission should be a key actor in this process. J R Soc Med 2020;113(3):101–4. doi: 10.1177/0141076819894664.
  • 62 Watkinson F, Dharmayat KI, Mastellos N. A mixed-method service evaluation of health information exchange in England: technology acceptance and barriers and facilitators to adoption. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;21(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06771-z.
  • 63 Wise J. New data strategy for England aims to rebuild public trust. BMJ 2022;377:o1455. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1455.
  • 64 Topol E. The topol review. Preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future; Feb 2019. p. 1–48.
  • 65 Scobie S, Castle-Clarke S. Implementing learning health systems in the UK NHS: Policy actions to improve collaboration and transparency and support innovation and better use of analytics. Learn Health Syst 2020;4(1):e10209. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10209.
  • 66 Marjanovic S, Altenhofer M, Hocking L, Chataway J, Ling T. Innovating for improved healthcare: Sociotechnical and innovation systems perspectives and lessons from the NHS. Sci Public Policy 2020;47(2):283–97. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scaa005.
  • 67 Frankel M, Chinitz D, Salzberg CA, Reichman K. Sustainable health information exchanges: the role of institutional factors. Isr J Health Policy Res 2013;2(1):21. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-2-21.
  • 68 Flaks-Manov N, Shadmi E, Hoshen M, Balicer RD. Health information exchange systems and length of stay in readmissions to a different hospital. J Hosp Med 2016;11(6):401–6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2535.
  • 69 Politi L, Codish S, Sagy I, Fink L. Balancing volume and duration of information consumption by physicians: The case of health information exchange in critical care. J Biomed Inform 2017 Jul;71:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.007.
  • 70 Nirel N, Rosen B, Sharon A, Blondheim O, Sherf M, Cohen AD. OFEK virtual medical records: an evaluation of an integrated hospital-community system. Harefuah 2011 Feb;150(2):72–8, 209.
  • 71 Gilboa A. The Implementation of a National Health Information Exchange Platform in Israel. Inter-American Development Bank; May 2022. doi: 10.18235/0004272.
  • 72 Colombo F, Oderkirk J, Slawomirski L. Health Information Systems, Electronic Medical Records, and Big Data in Global Healthcare: Progress and Challenges in OECD Countries. In: Haring R, Kickbusch I, Ganten D, Moeti M, editors. Handbook of Global Health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 1–31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-05325-3_71-1.
  • 73 State of Israel Ministry of Health. Health Information Exchange. [Available at: https://www.health.gov.il/English/About/projects/shared_medical_info/Pages/default.asp; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 74 Zimlichman E. Israel: A Nationwide Health Information Exchange Program in Israel: A Unique Case Study. In: Health Systems Improvement Across the Globe. CRC Press; 2018.
  • 75 World Health Organization, Israel. Advancing Interoperability and Data Sharing in the Health System; Jan. 2022. [Available at: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/509597/vignette-interoperability-data-sharing-Israel.pdf; accessed Feb. 27, 2023].
  • 76 Itzhaki M, Koren E, Abu Hussein K, Levy L, Gantz I, Barnoy S. Use of Health Information Exchange in the Continuity of Care as Viewed by Patients and Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study. CIN Comput Inform Nurs 2020 Mar;:10.1097/CIN.holmgrenholmgren0861. doi: 10.1097/CIN.holmgrenholmgren0861.
  • 77 Balicer R, Shadmi E, Manor O, Leventer-Roberts M. Israel: Structural and Functional Integration at the Israeli Healthcare System. In: Amelung V, Stein V, Suter E, Goodwin N, Nolte E, Balicer R, editors. Handbook Integrated Care. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 1055–63. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-69262-9_62.
  • 78 Ben-David R. Israel approves 19 programs for $30 million digital health initiative. The Times of Israel; May 30, 2022. [Available at: https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-approves-19-programs-for-30-million-digital-health-initiative/; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 79 Dispatch n.o 182/2013 of Ministry of Health, 182; Sep. 2013. [Available at: https://dre.pt/dre/detalhe/despacho/12071-2013-2529406; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 80 Interoperabilidade Técnica: LIGHt; PNB; NCP, SPMS, 2017. [Available at: https://www.spms.min-saude.pt/2017/06/interoperabilidade-tecnica-light-pnb-ncp/; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 81 Catan G, Espanha R, Mendes RV, Toren O, Chinitz D. Health information technology implementation - impacts and policy considerations: a comparison between Israel and Portugal. Isr J Health Policy Res 2015 Aug;4(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13584-015-0040-9.
  • 82 Mendonça SR. The roadmap to healthcare digitalization: factors that affect the Portuguese approach to ehealth; 2022. [Available at: https://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/144871; accessed Dec. 14, 2022].
  • 83 ACSS, RSE – Registo de Saúde Electrónico – R2A: Orientações para Especificação Funcional e Técnica do Sistema de RSE, 2009. [Avaialable at: https://www.essnortecvp.pt/upload/files/R2A_Orientacoes_FuncTec_v3.pdf; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 84 Registo de Saúde Eletrónico, SPMS. [Available at: https://www.spms.min-saude.pt/2020/07/registo-de-saude-eletronico/; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 85 Simões JA, Augusto GF, Fronteira I, Hernández-Quevedo C. Portugal: health system review. Health Syst Transit 2011;19(2):1-184.
  • 86 Martins H, Monteiro M, Loureiro P, Cortes M. SPMS - Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde. E.P.E. Centro Nacional de TeleSaúde Plano Estratégico Nacional para a Telessaúde 2019-2022, 201. [Available at: https://www.spms.min-saude.pt/; accessed Mar. 29, 2023].
  • 87 Canhão H. Portugal in the e-health path. EIT Health 2020 Feb 28. [Available at: https://eithealth.eu/news-article/portugal-launches-its-national-telehealth-as-the-first-country-in-the-world/; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 88 SPMS. Aplicação móvel SNS 24, 2022. [Available at: https://www.sns24.gov.pt/guia/utilizar-a-aplicacao-movel-sns-24/; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 89 Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.o 62/2016 | DRE,” 67, Oct. 2016. [Available at: https://dre.pt/dre/detalhe/resolucao-conselho-ministros/62-2016-75542124; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 90 SPMS. ENESIS 2020 – 2022; 2019. [Available at: https://www.spms.min-saude.pt/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ENESIS2022_VersaoParaConsultaPublicaOut2019.pdf; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 91 Portugal: Cyberattack on Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo Impacting Notification of COVID-19 Test Results; 2021 Jun 28. [Available at: https://www.databreaches.net/portugal-cyberattack-on-hospital-do-divino-espirito-santo-impacting-notification-of-covid-19-test-results/; accessed Jan. 02, 2023].
  • 92 Gonçalves ME, Raimundo J. Over Troubled Water: E-Health Platforms and the Protection of Personal Data: The Case of Portugal. Port J Public Health 2017;35(1):52–66. doi: 10.1159/000477650.
  • 93 Rucker D, Hasan A, Lewis L, Tao D. GDHP-Advancing Interoperability Together Globally. Global Digital Health Partnership, Sydney, Australia. GDHP White Paper on Interoperability 2020 Jul. [Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/page/2021-01/GDHP-Advancing%20Interoperability%20Together%20Globally.pdf; accessed Feb. 28, 2023].
  • 94 Vasco Santos J, Martins FS, Lopes F, Souza J, Freitas A. Discharge status of the patient: evaluating hospital data quality with a focus on long-term and palliative care patient data. Health Inf Manag J 2021 Nov30;18333583211054160. doi: 10.1177/18333583211054161.
  • 95 Savage M, Neinstein A, Adler-Milstein J. Measure The Impact Of The ONC’s New Interoperability Rules Now. Health Affairs Blog; 2020 Jul 7.
  • 96 Rahurkar S, Vest JR, Menachemi N. Despite The Spread Of Health Information Exchange. There Is Little Evidence Of Its Impact On Cost, Use, And Quality Of Care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015 Mar;34(3):477–83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0729.
  • 97 Menachemi N, Rahurkar S, Harle CA, Vest JR. The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018 Sep;25(9):1259–65. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy035.
  • 98 Adler-Milstein J, Zhao W, Willard-Grace R, Knox M, Grumbac, K. Electronic health records and burnout: Time spent on the electronic health record after hours and message volume associated with exhaustion but not with cynicism among primary care clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020;27(4):531–8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz220.
  • 99 Overhage JM, McCallie D. Physician Time Spent Using the Electronic Health Record During Outpatient Encounters: A Descriptive Study. Ann Intern Med 2020 Feb 4;172(3):169-74. doi: 10.7326/M18-3684.
  • 100 Holmgren AJ, Downing NL, Bates DW, Shanafelt TD, Milstein A, Sharp CD, et al. Assessment of Electronic Health Record Use Between US and Non-US Health Systems. JAMA Intern Med 2021 Feb 1;181(2):251-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7071.
  • 101 Adler-Milstein J, Wang MD. The impact of transitioning from availability of outside records within electronic health records to integration of local and outside records within electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020 Apr;27(4):606–12. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa006.
  • 102 D’Amore JD, McCrary LK, Denson J, Li C, Vitale CJ, Tokachichu P, et al. Clinical data sharing improves quality measurement and patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021 Jul14;28(7):1534–42. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab039.
  • 103 Indiana Network for Population Health focuses on social determinants of health, EurekAlert! [Available at: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/653368; accessed Dec. 15, 2022].
  • 104 Esdar M, J. Hüsers J, Weiß JP, Rauch J, Hübner U. Diffusion dynamics of electronic health records: A longitudinal observational study comparing data from hospitals in Germany and the United States. Int J Med Inform 2019 Nov;131:103952. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103952.
  • 105 Nohl-Deryk P, Brinkmann JK, Gerlach FM, Schreyögg J, Achelrod D. [Barriers to Digitalisation of Healthcare in Germany: A Survey of Experts], Gesundheitswesen Bundesverb. Arzte Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes Ger 2018 Nov;80(11):939–45. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121010.
  • 106 Payne TH, Detmer DE, Wyatt JC, Buchan IE. National-scale clinical information exchange in the United Kingdom: lessons for the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18(1):91–8. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005611.
  • 107 Warren L, Clarke J, Darzi A. Measuring the Scale of Hospital Health Record System Fragmentation in England. Health Serv Res 2020;55(S1):43–4. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13386.
  • 108 NHS. A plan for digital health and social care. National Health Service; Jun. 2022. [Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-plan-for-digital-health-and-social-care/a-plan-for-digital-health-and-social-care; accessed Feb. 28, 2023].
  • 109 Lejbkowicz I, Denekamp Y, Reis S, Goldenberg D. Electronic medical record systems in Israel’s public hospitals. Isr Med Assoc J IMAJ 2004 Oct;6(10):583–7.
  • 110 Heart T, O’Reilly P, Sammon D, O’Donoghue J. Bottom‐up or top‐down? A comparative analysis of electronic health record diffusion in Ireland and Israel. J Syst Inf Technol 2009 Jan;11(3):244–68. doi: 10.1108/13287260910983623.
  • 111 Prey JE, Polubriaginof F, Kuperman JG, Tiase V, Collins SA, Vawdrey DK. International perspectives on sharing clinical data with patients. Int J Med Inform 2016 Feb;86:135–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.11.007.
  • 112 Hübner UH, Wilson GM, Morawski TS, Ball MJ. Nursing Informatics: A Health Informatics, Interprofessional and Global Perspective. Springer Nature; 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-91237-6.
  • 113 Vest JR. Health information exchange: national and international approaches. Adv Health Care Manag 2012;12:3–24. doi: 10.1108/s1474-8231(2012)0000012005.
  • 114 Grenha Teixeira J, de Pinho NF, Patrício L. Bringing service design to the development of health information systems: The case of the Portuguese national electronic health record. Int J Med Inf Inform 2019 Dec;132:103942. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.002.