Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2023; 15(01): e80-e85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768026
Research Article

Validating the Efficacy of a Stepwise Video Module for Conjunctival Closure

Geoffrey Nguyen 
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
,
Jamie Palmer
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
,
Moran R. Levin
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
,
Ramya Swamy
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
,
Janet Alexander
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
› Author Affiliations FundingThis research was supported in part by the University of Maryland Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences educational grant.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study is to describe a cost-effective and portable surgical training module for ophthalmology trainees and demonstrate its effectiveness in building confidence and reducing stress with conjunctival closure.

Methods A total of 29 trainees (fourth year medical students, postgraduate year (PGY) 1 ophthalmology residents, PGY2 ophthalmology residents) participated in the module during July 2022. They completed a Pre-Module and Post-Module Questionnaire, with some questions assessing their confidence level and other questions assessing their stress level with conjunctival closure. A Likert scale of 1 to 10 was used to evaluate their level of confidence or stress (with 1 indicating low confidence or low stress and 10 indicating high confidence or high stress).

Results Prior to completing the module, participants had an average conjunctival suturing skills confidence level score of 2.6 ± 1.6, which increased significantly to 5.6 ± 1.6 after completing the module (p < 0.001). Participant's stress level score with performing conjunctival closure on live patients significantly decreased from 7.5 ± 2.4 to 5.6 ± 1.5 (p < 0.001) after completion of the module. When participants were separated into two groups, participants in the PGY1 residents/medical students group had an average conjunctival suturing skills confidence level score of 2.7 ± 1.8, which rose significantly to 5.1 ± 1.5 after completing the module (p = 0.008), whereas PGY2 residents had an average conjunctival suturing skills confidence level score of 2.6 ± 1.6, which rose significantly to 5.8 ± 1.7 after completing the module (p < 0.001). Participant's stress level scores with performing conjunctival closure on live patients did not show significant results in the PGY1 residents/medical students group but significantly decreased from 7.2 ± 2.2 to 5.2 ± 1.3 (p < 0.001) in PGY2 residents. Participants agreed that the video presented was effective for learning the surgical skill and that the module was engaging and prepared them well to learn more advanced conjunctival suturing techniques.

Conclusion Our surgical training module is an effective teaching tool for ophthalmology trainees to increase confidence and decrease stress about performing conjunctiva closure. It provides an opportunity for trainees to repetitively practice key surgical techniques on an inexpensive and reusable training model.

Keywords

COVID-19 - ophthalmology surgical education - conjunctival closure - video-based curriculum - stepwise teaching method - virtual resident education

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 28 August 2022

Accepted: 01 March 2023

Article published online:
12 April 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Lancaster N. Tisseel fibrin glue vs sutures for conjunctival closure in glaucoma drainage implant surgery. J Ophthalmol Clin Res 2016; 3 (02) 1-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 2003; 327 (7422): 1032-1037
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Saleh M, Sinha Y, Weinberg D. Using peer-assisted learning to teach basic surgical skills: medical students' experiences. Med Educ Online 2013; 18 (01) 21065 DOI: 10.3402/meo.v18i0.21065.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 White CA, Wrzosek JA, Chesnutt DA, Enyedi LB, Cabrera MT. A novel method for teaching key steps of strabismus surgery in the wet lab. J AAPOS 2015; 19 (05) 468-70.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mishra K, Mathai M, Della Rocca RC, Reddy HS. Improving resident performance in oculoplastic surgery: a new curriculum using surgical wet laboratory videos. J Surg Educ 2017; 74 (05) 837-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lorch AC, Kloek CE. An evidence-based approach to surgical teaching in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol 2017; 62 (03) 371-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kloek CE, Borboli-Gerogiannis S, Chang K. et al. A broadly applicable surgical teaching method: evaluation of a stepwise introduction to cataract surgery. J Surg Educ 2014; 71 (02) 169-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pantanelli SM, Papachristou G, Callahan C, Chen M, Khalifa Y. Wet lab-based cataract surgery training curriculum for the PGY 2/PGY 3 ophthalmology resident. MedEdPORTAL 2018; 14: 10782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nguyen G, Palmer J, Ludeman E, Levin MR, Swamy R, Alexander J. Evaluating the efficacy of microsurgical training methods in ophthalmology education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (02) e216-e227
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Palmer J, Nguyen G, Levin MR, Swamy R, Alexander J. A novel method for strabismus surgery education using an asynchronous video module. J AAPOS 2022; 26 (04) 218-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Palmer J, Nguyen G, Alexander J. . Conjunctiva closure - interrupted suture. YouTube. Published 2020. Accessed December 16, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcZGeIkstIg&t=25s
    PubMed
  • 12 Crespi-Flores VG, Minguini N, Temporini ER, Carvalho KM. Strabismus surgery learning for ophthalmology residents of university service. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2012; 75 (03) 188-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ramani S, Pradeep TG, Sundaresh DD. Effect of wet-laboratory training on resident performed manual small-incision cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018; 66 (06) 793-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Walkden A, Au L, Fenerty C. Trabeculectomy training: review of current teaching strategies. Adv Med Educ Pract 2020; 11: 31-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Simulated Ocular Surgery Website. . Accessed July 23, 2022 at: https://simulatedocularsurgery.com/products#!/Basic-TrabEye-price-per-pack-of-6-eyes/p/213469315/category=125872508
    PubMed