Endoscopy 2023; 55(S 02): S329
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1765933
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2023
ePoster

Effectiveness of Low-Volume Colonic Preparation and Bisacodyl in Hospitalized Patients: Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial

F. J. Lopez Diaz
1   Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Health Sciences and Nutrition, Ciudad de México, Mexico
,
R. Macias Rodriguez
1   Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Health Sciences and Nutrition, Ciudad de México, Mexico
,
J. M. Mayorquín Aguilar
1   Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Health Sciences and Nutrition, Ciudad de México, Mexico
,
S. Lopez Romero
1   Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Health Sciences and Nutrition, Ciudad de México, Mexico
,
E. Jasso Baltazar
1   Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Health Sciences and Nutrition, Ciudad de México, Mexico
,
R. Barreto-Zuniga
1   Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Health Sciences and Nutrition, Ciudad de México, Mexico
› Author Affiliations
 

Aims To evaluate the quality of bowel preparation through the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) in patients with low-volume and bisacodyl and high-volume preparations. A score > or = 6 points was considered as adequate preparation. Additionally the adverse effects of the preparations were assessed.

Methods Randomized clinical trial, single blind, which was carried out during February 2022 until November 2022. Patients hospitalized with a medical indication for colonoscopy were randomized into two groups: Low-volume (Bisacodyl 10 mg + 2 liters of Polyethylene glycol in divided doses) and High-Volume (4 liters of Polyethylene glycol in divided doses). Finally, after the procedure, tolerance to medication was assessed using a questionnaire.

Results A total of 79 colonoscopies were performed. 39 patients were assigned to the High-volume preparation group and 39 patients to the low-volume preparation group. Regarding the quality of the colonic preparation, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (97.4% High-volume preparation Vs 87.2% low-volume preparation (p=0.20)). The perception of abdominal pain showed a significant difference in favor of low volume group (p=0.011) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11].

Conclusions Low-volume preparation in hospitalized patients was equally effective in achieving a BBPS score of 6 or more points compared to 4-liter bowel preparation in divided dose. The low-volume preparation demonstrated fewer preparation associated adverse effects.



Publication History

Article published online:
14 April 2023

© 2023. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • 1 Hernandez PV, Horsley-Silva JL, Snyder DL.. Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020; 20 (01) 227
  • 2 Frazzoni L, Spada C, Radaelli F.. 1L- vs. 4L-Polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy among inpatients: A propensity score-matching analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2020; 52 (12) 1486-1493
  • 3 Chan WK, Azmi N, Mahadeva S.. Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20 (39) 14488-94
  • 4 Téllez-Ávila FI, Murcio-Pérez E, Saúl A, Herrera-Gómez S.. Efficacy and tolerability of low-volume (2 L) versus single- (4 L) versus split-dose (2 L+++2 L) polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized clinical trial. Dig Endosc. 2014; 26 (06) 731-6
  • 5 Trujillo Benavides O, Solana Senties S, Aguilar Mendoza J.. Guía clínica de calidad en colonoscopia y polipectomía. Endoscopia 2021; 33 (02) 54-74
  • 6 Seo EH, Kim TO, Park MJ, Joo HR, Heo NY.. Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75 (03) 583-90
  • 7 Nguyen DL, Jamal MM, Nguyen ET, Puli SR.. Low-residue versus clear liquid diet before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83 (03) 499-507.e1
  • 8 Kolfakis P, Tziatzios G, Papanikolaou IS.. Strategies to Improve Inpatients' Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019; 2019: 5147208
  • 9 Mahmood S, Farooqui SM, Madhoun MF.. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 30 (08) 819-826
  • 10 Yadlapati R, Johnston ER, Gregory DL. et al. Predictors of Inadequate Inpatient Colonoscopy Preparation and Its Association with Hospital Length of Stay and Costs. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60 (11) 3482-90
  • 11 Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45 (02) 142-50