Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 72(01): 070-076
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764315
Original Thoracic

Confirmation of Safety of Titanium Wire in Sternotomy Closure, A Randomized Prospective Study

Mohamed Eraqi
1   Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany
2   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Dresden at the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
,
Abdel Hannan Diab
2   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Dresden at the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
,
Klaus Matschke
2   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Dresden at the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
,
Konstantin Alexiou
2   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Dresden at the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background There are many factors that are known to increase the risk of sternal wound infection (SWI); some studies have reported that nickel is a risk factor for SWI. Titanium wires have only been used as an alternative to steel wires in patients with known allergy to nickel. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the safety of using titanium wires compared to that on the safety of steel wires for sternum closure after cardiac surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of titanium wires, even in patients without a known allergy.

Methods A total of 322 patients who underwent elective full median sternotomy were randomly assigned to sternal closure either by titanium wires (n = 161) or by stainless steel wires.

Results Fourteen patients had sternal instability, six (3.7%) patients in the titanium group and eight (5%) patients in the stainless steel group (p = 0.585). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of postoperative wound infection (p = 0.147). Patients in the titanium group experienced statistically significant lower postoperative pain than those in the stainless steel group (p = 0.024). The wire type was not an independent risk factor for SI, as shown by univariate and logistic regression analyses.

Conclusion Titanium wires are a good alternative and have been proven to be safe and effective for sternal closure. The surgeon should be aware of the possibility of developing an allergic reaction to the wires, especially in patients with previous multiple allergic histories.

Keywords

titanium wires - nickel allergy - sternal instability - sternotomy closure


Publication History

Received: 05 December 2022

Accepted: 26 January 2023

Article published online:
14 March 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Rupprecht L, Schmid C. Deep sternal wound complications: an overview of old and new therapeutic options. Open J Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 6: 9-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lopez J, Sachithanandan A, Leow M. Allergic reaction to stainless steel sternotomy wires requiring removal: a case report and literature review. Med J Malaysia 2016; 71 (03) 142-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Teo Wendy ZW, Schalock PC. Hypersensitivity reactions to implanted metal devices: facts and fictions. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2016; 26 (05) 279-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dominguez-Massa C, Bel-Minguez AM, Perez-Guillen M, Berbel-Bonillo A, Hornero-Sos F. Mitral ring extraction due to nickel allergy. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105 (04) e177-e178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zywicka EM, Theologou T, Love S, Nawaytou O. Sternal wires-induced severe systemic inflammatory response and cardiac tamponade. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107 (03) e175-e176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wilson APR, Weavill C, Burridge J, Kelsey MC. The use of the wound scoring method 'ASEPSIS' in postoperative wound surveillance. J Hosp Infect 1990; 16 (04) 297-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Abu-Omar Y, Kocher GJ, Bosco P. et al. European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery expert consensus statement on the prevention and management of mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 51 (01) 10-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hanawa T. Titanium-tissue interface reaction and its control with surface treatment. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019; 7: 170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Abboud CS, Wey SB, Baltar VT. Risk factors for mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (02) 676-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Milano CA, Kesler K, Archibald N, Sexton DJ, Jones RH. Mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Risk factors and long-term survival. Circulation 1995; 92 (08) 2245-2251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Malhotra A, Garg P, Bishnoi AK. et al. Is steel wire closure of sternotomy better than polyester suture closure?. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2014; 22 (04) 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Clauss M, Graf S, Gersbach S, Hintermann B, Ilchmann T, Knupp M. Material and biofilm load of K wires in toe surgery: titanium versus stainless steel. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (07) 2312-2317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ancalmo N, Perniciaro C, Ochsner J. Hypersensitivity reaction to sternal wires: a possible cause of persistent postoperative pain. Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 1 (04) 439-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fine PG, Karwande SV. Sternal wire-induced persistent chest pain: a possible hypersensitivity reaction. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49 (01) 135-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Atanaskova Mesinkovska N, Tellez A, Molina L. et al. The effect of patch testing on surgical practices and outcomes in orthopedic patients with metal implants. Arch Dermatol 2012; 148 (06) 687-693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pacheco KA. Allergy to surgical implants. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2019; 56 (01) 72-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar