Download PDF
VPT Magazin 2023; 09(01): 16-21
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1763537
Wissen

Update Motorisches Lernen (1) Definitionen – Unterscheidungen – Theorien

Gail Cox Steck
,
Christina Janssen
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Der nachfolgende erste Beitrag stellt Definitionen, Unterscheidungen und Theorien dar. Der zweite Beitrag (► Seite 22) erläutert das „Lernrad“ zum Prozess und die strukturierte Anwendung des motorischen Lernens in der Praxis. Der dritte Artikel vermittelt Beispiele für lernfördernde Instruktionsarten (► Seite 24).



Publication History

Article published online:
20 February 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

    • Literatur

    • 1 Majsak MJ. Concepts and Principles of Neurological Rehabilitation. In: Fell DW, Liunnen KY, Rauk RP. (eds) Lifespan Neurorehabilitation: A Patient-centred Approach from Examination to Interventions and Outcomes. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2018
      Google Scholar
    • 2 Horak FB. Assumptions Underlying Motor Control for Neurologic Rehabilitation: Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems. Proceedings of the II STEP Conference. Alexandria: Foundation for Physical Therapy; 1991
      Google Scholar
    • 3 Winstein CJ, Kay DB. Translating the science into practice: Shaping rehabilitation practice to enhance recovery after brain damage. Prog Brain Res 2015; 218: 331-360 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.01.004.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Winstein CJ, Lewthwaite R, Blanton SR. et al. Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice: a historical perspective with case exemplar from the accelerated skill acquisition program. J Neurol Phys Ther 2014; 38: 190-200 DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000046.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Application. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2013
      Google Scholar
    • 6 Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor Control Translating Research into Clinical Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007
      Google Scholar
    • 7 Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G. et al. Agreed Definitions and a Shared Vision for New Standards in Stroke Recovery Research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable Taskforce. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2017; 31: 793-799 DOI: 10.1177/1545968317732668.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2006; 19: 84-90 DOI: 10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915.cc.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Winstein CJ. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2018
      Google Scholar
    • 10 VanSant AF. Life-Span Motor Development: Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems. Proceedings of the II STEP Conference. Alexandria: Foundation for Physical Therapy; 1991
      Google Scholar
    • 11 Brooks VB. The Neural Basis of Motor Control. Oxford: University Press; 1986
      Google Scholar
    • 12 World Health Organisation (WHO). ICF: Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit. 2005 Im Internet (Stand 05.09.2022): www.bfarm.de/DE/Kodiersysteme/Klassifikationen/ICF/_node.html
      PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor ”recovery” and ”compensation” mean in patients following stroke?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 313-319 DOI: 10.1177/1545968308328727.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Kleynen M, Beurskens A, Olijve H. et al. Application of motor learning in neurorehabilitation: a framework for health-care professionals. Physiother Theory Pract 2020; 36: 1-20 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1483987.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 15 De Bono E. De Bonos neue Denkschule. Kreativer Denken, effektiver arbeiten, mehr erreichen.. München: MVG; 2005
      Google Scholar
    • 16 Winstein CJ, Wolf SL, Schweighofer N. Task-oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery. In: Stein J, Harvey RL, Winstein CJ. et al (eds) Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. New York: Demos Medical; 2014
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Bernshteĭn NA. The Co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1967
      Google Scholar
    • 18 Gentile AM. Skill acquisition: action, movement, and neuromotor processes. In: Carr JH, Shepherd RB. (eds) Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville: Aspen; 2000
      Google Scholar
    • 19 Guadagnoli M, Morin MP, Dubrowski A. The application of the challenge point framework in medical education. Med Educ 2012; 46: 447-453 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04210.x.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Krakauer JW. The applicability of motor learning to neurorehabilitation. In: Dietz V, Ward N. (eds) Oxford Textbook of Neurorehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015
      Google Scholar
    • 21 Adams JA. A closed-loop theory of motor learning. J Mot Behav 1971; 3: 111-149 DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1971.10734898.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Ranganathan R, Lee MH, Newell KM. Repetition without Repetition: Challenges in Understanding Behavioral Flexibility in Motor Skill. Frontiers in Psychology 2020; 11: 2018 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02018.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Optimizing performance through intrinsic Motivation and attention for learning. The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning: Psychon Bull Rev 2016; 23: 1382-1414 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9.
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

    • Quelle

    • Huber M, Janssen C, Lüscher Erzer F. et al. Motorisches Lernen in der Neuroreha. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2022
      Google Scholar