Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal Infections 2023; 13(01): 059-060
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761935
Letter to the Editor

Letter: Think (and tap) Thrice before Diagnosing Tuberculous Peritonitis by Ascitic Adenosine Deaminase Alone

Abhi K Singh
1   Helping Hands Community Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Editors

We read with interest the commentary by Dalal et al regarding the use of ascitic adenosine deaminase (ADA) for diagnosing peritoneal tuberculosis.[1] A 37-year-old male who never consumed alcohol presented with abdominal pain and progressive abdominal distension for the last 3 months. He had anorexia, weight loss, but denied a history of fever, altered bowel habits, or gastrointestinal bleeding. On examination, he was cachexic (body mass index: 16.8 kg/m2) and pale, with no features suggestive of chronic liver disease. He had gross tense ascites, which was confirmed with ultrasonography. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen revealed gross ascites ([Fig. 1A]) with thickened and enhanced peritoneum and thickening of the ileocecal region ([Fig. 1B]) and multiple mildly enhancing mesenteric, ileocolic, gastro hepatic, and lesser omentum lymph nodes. His ascitic fluid analysis revealed low serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG; 0.8 mg/dL) ascites with ADA of 37 IU/L. Cultures for mycobacterium tuberculosis and Xpert Mtb/Rif were negative. Antituberculous therapy was started in view of high ADA and low SAAG ascites. His initial ascitic fluid cytology for malignant cells was negative, but the second analysis showed the presence of atypical cells. A colonoscopy showed growth in the caecum, with a biopsy showing adenocarcinoma of the caecum.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Computed tomography showing (A) ascites with (B) thickened bowel loops.

Although ADA levels have shown high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (97%) using cutoff values from 36 to 40 IU/L for the diagnosis of peritoneal tuberculosis, false positives have been reported.[2] Reported causes of false-positive elevation of ADA are peritoneal carcinomatosis, lymphoma, and other conditions.[1] Therefore, it has been suggested that in cases the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis is based solely on elevated ADA in ascitic fluid (in the absence of microbiological positivity), abdominal paracentesis should be sent for malignant cytology at least thrice.[3] [4]

Data Availability

No additional data are associated with this submission.


Informed Consent

Consent to publish was obtained from the patient.




Publication History

Received: 10 December 2022

Accepted: 28 December 2022

Article published online:
22 September 2023

© 2023. Gastroinstestinal Infection Society of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India