A health economic evaluation of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts

Abstract

Background and study aims The low sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), especially for the diagnosis of serous cystadenomas (SCAs), can be associated with diagnostic uncertainty that can regularly lead to unnecessary surgical procedures. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) used with EUS-FNA improves diagnostic accuracy, helping to reduce unnecessary surgery and patient follow-up. This study was conducted to evaluate the economic benefit of EUS-FNA + nCLE.

Patients and methods Probabilities used were derived from two studies representative of the two diagnostic strategies: a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed by EUS-FNA alone and a prospective study of patients diagnosed by EUS-FNA + nCLE. Costs were based on French healthcare system rates; both private and public sector rates were included. A decision tree structure model used these probabilities and costs for two hypothetical cohorts of 1000 patients.

Results EUS-FNA + nCLE resulted in a reduction of 23 % in the total rate of surgical intervention, which translated to a reduction in clinical costs of 13 % (public sector) and 14 % (private sector). Additionally, the reduced rate of surgery would save the lives of 4 in 1000 patients. A stochastic sensitivity analysis using 100 simulations showed that in all cases the number of interventions was less for EUS-FNA + nCLE than for EUS-FNA. There was also a reduction in the incidence of false negatives using EUS-FNA + nCLE.

Conclusions EUS-FNA + nCLE results in significant economic benefits by reducing the incidence of misdiagnosis through improved diagnostic accuracy.

• References

• 1 de Jong K, Bruno MJ, Fockens P. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012; 2012: 147465
• 2 de Jong K, Nio CY, Hermans JJ. et al. High prevalence of pancreatic cysts detected by screening magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 806-811
• 3 de Jong K, Nio CY, Mearadji B. et al. Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging. Pancreas 2012; 41: 278-282
• 4 Park WG, Mascarenhas R, Palaez-Luna M. et al. Diagnostic performance of cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen and amylase in histologically confirmed pancreatic cysts. Pancreas 2011; 40: 42-45
• 5 Nakai Y, Iwashita T, Shinoura S. et al. Role of serial EUS-guided FNA on pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a retrospective analysis of repeat carcinoembryonic antigen measurements. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 780-784
• 6 Napoleon B, Lemaistre AI, Pujol B. et al. A novel approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic serous cystadenoma: needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 26-32
• 7 Napoleon B, Lemaistre AI, Pujol B. et al. In vivo characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions by needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE): proposition of a comprehensive nCLE classification confirmed by an external retrospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 2603-2612
• 8 Bruno MJ. Novel diagnostic approach to pancreatic cysts: is confocal laser endomicroscopy bridging the gap?. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 4-5
• 9 Jais B, Rebours V, Malleo G. et al. Serous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: a multinational study of 2622 patients under the auspices of the International Association of Pancreatology and European Pancreatic Club (European Study Group on Cystic Tumors of the Pancreas). Gut 2016; 65: 305-312
• 10 Brugge WR, Lauwers GY, Sahani D. et al. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. NEJM 2004; 351: 1218-1226
• 11 Belsley NA, Pitman MB, Lauwers GY. et al. Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: limitations and pitfalls of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer 2008; 114: 102-110
• 12 Le Borgne J, de Calan L, Partensky C. Cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas of the pancreas: a multiinstitutional retrospective study of 398 cases. French Surgical Association. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 152-161
• 13 Maker AV, Lee LS, Raut CP. et al. Cytology from pancreatic cysts has marginal utility in surgical decision-making. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 3187-3192
• 14 Müssle B, Distler M, Wolk S. et al. Management of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions: a case-based survey. Pancreatology 2017; 17: 431-437
• 15 Thornton GD, McPhail MJ, Nayagam S. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2013; 13: 48-57
• 16 Thosani N, Thosani S, Qiao W. et al. Role of EUS-FNA-based cytology in the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2756-2766
• 17 Tseng JF, Warshaw AL, Sahani DV. et al. Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: tumor growth rates and recommendations for treatment. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 413-419
• 18 Fernandez-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP. et al. Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 427-433
• 19 Agence Technique de l’Information su l’Hospitalisation. Available from: www.atih.sante.fr/ (Accessed: 12 September 2017 [in French])
• 20 Vege SS, Ziring B, Jain R. et al. American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2015; 148: 819-822
• 21 Napoleon B, Pujol B, Palazzo M. et al. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: preliminary results of the first prospective multicenter study (Abstract 602). Gastroenterology 2017; 152: S132-S133