Robot-Assisted and Device-Based Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity

Abstract

Neurorehabilitation of patients with upper limb motor dysfunction due to central nervous system damage still lacks adequate standardization. During the last decade, robot- and device-assisted rehabilitation has become more feasible for the treatment of functional disorders of the upper limb after stroke. Here we present an overview of technological aspects and differential use of devices for upper limb rehabilitation as well as a review of relevant clinical studies. We also discuss the potential for standardized evaluation in the context of limited health care resources. The effectiveness of device-assisted therapy, in comparison to conventional approaches, remains a matter of debate, largely due to the heterogeneous design of the available clinical studies. However, we believe that a better understanding of the timing, intensity, and quality of upper limb rehabilitation, as well as technological progress, will lead to the establishment of a central role for robot- and device-assisted rehabilitation in the next decade.

Key words

robot-assisted - upper extremity - robotics - neurorehabilitation

• References

• 1 Persson HC, Parziali M, Danielsson A. et al. Outcome and upper extremity function within 72 hours after first occasion of stroke in an unselected population at a stroke unit: A part of the SALGOT study. BMC Neurol 2012; 12: 162
• 2 Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A. et al. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 2005; 36: 1480-1484
• 3 Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J. et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: Impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181-2186
• 4 Platz T, Roschka S. Rehabilitative Therapie bei Armparese nach Schlaganfall. Neurol Rehabil 2009; 15: 81-106
• 5 Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke (Update). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; CD006876
• 6 Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T et al. Electromechanical and robotassisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; CD006876
• 7 Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, van Wegen EEH. et al. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31: 107-121
• 8 Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K. et al. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014; 11: 3
• 9 Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. et al. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000; 54: 1938-1944
• 10 Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC. et al. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 952-959
• 11 Hesse S, Kuhlmann H, Wilk J. et al. A new electromechanical trainer for sensorimotor rehabilitation of paralysedfingers: A case series in chronic and acute stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008; 5: 21
• 12 Goršič M, Cikajlo I, Novak D. Competitive and cooperative arm rehabilitation games played by a patient and unimpaired person. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017; 14: 23
• 13 Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 6: 20
• 14 van Dokkum LEH, Ward T, Laffont I. Brain computer interfaces for neurorehabilitation – its current status as a rehabilitation strategy post-stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 58: 3-8
• 15 Barker RN, Brauer SG, Carson RG. Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel non-robotic device: A randomized clinical trial. Stroke 2008; 39: 1800-1807
• 16 Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG. et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1772-1783
• 17 Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M. et al. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke. A single-blinded randomized trial in two centres. Stroke 2005; 36: 1960-1966
• 18 Brokaw EB, Nichols D, Holley RJ. et al. Robotic therapy provides a stimulus for upper limb motor recovery after stroke that is complementary to and distinct from conventional therapy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014; 28: 367-376
• 19 Sale P, Mazzoleni S, Lombardi V. et al. Recovery of hand function with robot-assisted therapy in acute stroke patients: A randomized-controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res. 2014; 37: 236-242
• 20 Shirota C, Jansa J, Diaz J. et al. On the assessment of coordination between upper extremities. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2016; 13: 80
• 21 Hsieh Y-w, Liing R-j, Lin K-c. et al. Sequencing bilateral robot-assisted arm therapy and constraint-induced therapy improves reach to press and trunk kinematics in patients with stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2016; 13: 31
• 22 Hall AM, Ferreira PH, Maher CG. The Influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 1099-1110