The Effect of First-Step Techniques from the Staggered Stance in American Football

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 3 different starting techniques from the staggered stance with regards to sprint time, reaction time, linear impulse and power. 11 male amateur American football players volunteered to participate in a testing session consisting of twelve 5 m sprints, 4 in each technique (normal (NORM), backwards false step (BFS) and forwards false step (FFS)) in random order. Sprint starts were performed on force plates to investigate ground reaction forces, reaction time and total sprint time. Analysis showed significant differences in sprint times, with NORM (1.77±0.10 s) being faster than FFS (1.81±0.12 s) and BFS (2.01±0.13 s), and FFS being faster than BFS, although no differences were found in reaction time. In terms of mean force and power, NORM (331.1±39.2N, 542.2±72.3W) and FFS (320.8±43.2N, 550.9±81.4W) were significantly larger than BFS (256.9±36.2N, 443.5±61.1W). This indicates that when starting from a staggered stance, the BFS is inferior to the others and should be avoided. However, since the force profiles of the NORM and the FFS were similar, the differences in sprint time could arise from a technique bias towards the NORM start.

• References

• 1 Brechue W, Mayhew J, Piper F. Characteristics of sprint performance in college football players. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 234: 1169-1178
• 2 Brown T, Vescovi J. Is stepping back really counterproductive?. Strength Cond J 2004; 26: 42-44
• 3 Coh M, Jost B, Skof B, Tomazin K, Dolenec A. Kinematic and kinetic parameters of the sprint start and start acceleration model of top sprinters. Gymnica 1998; 28: 33-42
• 4 Cronin J, Green J, Levin G, Brughelli M, Frost D. Effect of starting stance on initial sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 990-992
• 5 Cusick J, Lund R, Ficklin T. A comparison of three different start techniques on sprint speed in collegiate linebackers. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 2669-2672
• 6 Frost D, Cronin J. Stepping back to improve sprint performance: A kinetic analysis of the first step forwards. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 2721-2728
• 7 Frost D, Cronin J, Levin G. Stepping backward can improve sprint performance over short distances. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 918-922
• 8 Hader K, Palazzi D, Buchheit M. Change of direction speed in soccer: How much braking is enough?. Kinesiology 2015; 47: 67-74
• 9 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sports and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
• 10 Johnson T, Brown L, Coburn J, Judelson D, Khamoui A, Tran T, Uribe B. Effect of four different starting stances on sprint time in collegiate volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 2641-2646
• 11 Komi PV. Physiological and biomechanical correlates of muscle function: effects of muscle structure and stretch-shortening cycle on force and speed. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1984; 12: 81-121
• 12 Kraan GA, van Veen J, Snijders C, Storm J. Starting from standing: why step backwards?. J Biomech 2001; 34: 211-215 2001
• 13 Mero A, Komi PV, Gregor RJ. Biomechanics of sprint running: a review. Sports Med 1992; 13: 376-392
• 14 Norvell J. Complete Wide Receiver. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013
• 15 Pincivero D, Bompa T. A physiological review of American football. Sports Med 1997; 23: 247-260
• 16 Slawinski J, Dumas R, Cheze L, Ontano G, Miller C, Mazure-Bonnefoy A. 3D kinematic of bunched, medium and elongated sprint start. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 555-560