Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760222
Information Technology Systems for Infection Control in German University Hospitals—Results of a Structured Survey a Year into the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pandemic
Funding This research was carried out as part of the National Research Network for Applied Surveillance and Testing (B-FAST) project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Founding code: 01KX2021 B-FAST).
Abstract
Background Digitalization is playing a major role in mastering the current coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, several outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in German hospitals last year have shown that many of the surveillance and warning mechanisms related to infection control (IC) in hospitals need to be updated.
Objectives The main objective of the following work was to assess the state of information technology (IT) systems supporting IC and surveillance in German university hospitals in March 2021, almost a year into the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Methods As part of the National Research Network for Applied Surveillance and Testing project within the Network University Medicine, a cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess the situation of IC IT systems in 36 university hospitals in Germany.
Results Among the most prominent findings were the lack of standardization of IC IT systems and the predominant use of commercial IC IT systems, while the vast majority of hospitals reported inadequacies in the features their IC IT systems provide for their daily work. However, as the pandemic has shown that there is a need for systems that can help improve health care, several German university hospitals have already started this upgrade independently.
Conclusions The deep challenges faced by the German health care sector regarding the integration and interoperability of IT systems designed for IC and surveillance are unlikely to be solved through punctual interventions and require collaboration between educational, medical, and administrative institutions.
Keywords
health information technology - medical informatics - infection control - interoperability - health IT - public health* Both authors have contributed equally to the article.
Publication History
Received: 21 January 2022
Accepted: 21 October 2022
Article published online:
09 January 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Robert-Koch-Institut. Nationaler Pandemieplan 2007:195.
- 2 Alpers K, Haller S, Buchholz U. RKI Feldteam. Untersuchung von SARS-CoV-2-Ausbrüchen in Deutschland durch Feldteams des Robert Koch-Instituts, Februar–Oktober 2020. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2021; 64 (04) 446-453
- 3 Graichen H. What is the difference between the first and the second/third wave of Covid-19? German perspective. J Orthop 2021; 24: A1-A3
- 4 Colizza V, Grill E, Mikolajczyk R. et al. Time to evaluate COVID-19 contact-tracing apps. Nat Med 2021; 27 (03) 361-362
- 5 Salathé M, Althaus CL, Anderegg N. et al. Early evidence of effectiveness of digital contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2 in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 2020; 150: w20457
- 6 Soriano JB, Fernández E, de Astorza Á. et al. Hospital epidemics tracker (HEpiTracker): description and pilot study of a mobile app to track COVID-19 in hospital workers. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020; 6 (03) e21653
- 7 Lin MY, Trick WE. Informatics in infection control. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2016; 30 (03) 759-770
- 8 Gesulga JM, Berjame A, Moquiala KS, Galido A. Barriers to electronic health record system implementation and information systems resources: a structured review. Procedia Comput Sci 2017; 124: 544-551
- 9 Walker DM, Yeager VA, Lawrence J, McAlearney AS. Identifying opportunities to strengthen the public health informatics infrastructure: exploring hospitals' challenges with data exchange. Milbank Q 2021; 99 (02) 393-425
- 10 Watkinson F, Dharmayat KI, Mastellos N. A mixed-method service evaluation of health information exchange in England: technology acceptance and barriers and facilitators to adoption. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21 (01) 737
- 11 Bruland P, Drepper J, Ganslandt T, Birger H. Selbstverpflichtungserklärung der Konsortien innerhalb der Medizininformatik- Initiative zur Einhaltung von Mindestanforderungen, die zur Erreichung der Interoperabilität zu erfüllen sind. Published 2017. Accessed November 11, 2021 at: https://www.medizininformatik-initiative.de/sites/default/files/inline-files/MII_04_Eckpunktepapier_Interoperabilit%C3%A4t_1-2.pdf
- 12 Hörbst A, Hayn D, Schreier G. EHealth2014–Health Informatics Meets EHealth: Outcomes Research: The Benefit of Health-IT. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press; 2014
- 13 Hota B, Jones RC, Schwartz DN. Informatics and infectious diseases: What is the connection and efficacy of information technology tools for therapy and health care epidemiology?. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36 (3, Supplement): S47-S56
- 14 Thompson TG. D.J. Brailer. The Decade of Health Information Technology: Delivering Consumer-centric and Information-Rich Health Care: Framework for Strategic Action. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Depart-ment of Health and Human Services; 2004
- 15 CDC. Tools for Healthcare Settings | Infection Control | CDC. Published February 11, 2021. Accessed August 22, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/tools/index.html
- 16 Bosco LJ, Alford AA, Feeser K. Heterogeneity and interoperability in local public health information systems. J Public Health Manag Pract 2021; 27 (05) 529-533
- 17 Dreher A, Flake F, Pietrowsky R, Loerbroks A. Attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in Germany: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21 (01) 851
- 18 Quan TP, Hope R, Clarke T. et al. Using linked electronic health records to report healthcare-associated infections. PLoS One 2018; 13 (11) e0206860
- 19 Russo PL, Shaban RZ, Macbeth D, Carter A, Mitchell BG. Impact of electronic healthcare-associated infection surveillance software on infection prevention resources: a systematic review of the literature. J Hosp Infect 2018; 99 (01) 1-7
- 20 Birkhead GS, Klompas M, Shah NR. Uses of electronic health records for public health surveillance to advance public health. Annu Rev Public Health 2015; 36 (01) 345-359
- 21 Robert Koch Institut. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Daily Situation Report of the Robert Koch Institute. 2020 . Available at: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/Archiv.html
- 22 Jayatilleke K. Challenges in implementing surveillance tools of high-income countries (HICs) in low middle income countries (LMICs). Curr Treat Options Infect Dis 2020; 12 (03) 191-201
- 23 Behnke M, Valik JK, Gubbels S. et al; PRAISE network. Information technology aspects of large-scale implementation of automated surveillance of healthcare-associated infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27 (Suppl. 01) S29-S39