Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759749
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Care of Women Experiencing Abortion in a University Hospital in Brazil
O Impacto da pandemia de COVID-19 no atendimento de mulheres que vivenciam o aborto em um hospital universitário no BrasilAbstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the care of patients with miscarriage and legal termination of pregnancy in a university hospital in Brazil.
Methods A cross-sectional study of women admitted for abortion due to any cause at Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. J. A. Pinotti of Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil, between July 2017 and September 2021. Dependent variables were abortion-related complications and legal interruption of pregnancy. Independent variables were prepandemic period (until February 2020) and pandemic period (from March 2020). The Cochran-Armitage test, Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney test, and multiple logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.
Results Five-hundred sixty-one women were included, 376 during the prepandemic period and 185 in the pandemic period. Most patients during pandemic were single, without comorbidities, had unplanned pregnancy, and chose to initiate contraceptive method after hospital discharge. There was no significant tendency toward changes in the number of legal interruptions or complications. Complications were associated to failure of the contraceptive method (odds ratio [OR] 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23–4.84), gestational age (OR 1.126; 95% CI 1.039–1.219), and preparation of the uterine cervix with misoprostol (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.01–3.96).
Conclusion There were no significant differences in duration of symptoms, transportation to the hospital, or tendency of reducing the number of legal abortions and increasing complications. The patients' profile probably reflects the impact of the pandemic on family planning.
Resumo
Objetivo Avaliar o impacto da pandemia de coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) no atendimento de pacientes com aborto espontâneo e interrupção legal da gravidez em um hospital universitário no Brasil.
Métodos Estudo transversal com mulheres admitidas por aborto por qualquer causa no Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. J. A. Pinotti da Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Brasil, entre julho de 2017 e setembro de 2021. As variáveis dependentes foram complicações relacionadas ao aborto e interrupção legal da gravidez. As variáveis independentes foram período pré-pandemia (até fevereiro de 2020) e período pandêmico (a partir de março de 2020). O teste de Cochran-Armitage, teste do qui-quadrado, teste de Mann-Whitney e regressão logística múltipla foram utilizados para análise estatística.
Resultados Foram incluídas 561 mulheres, 376 no período pré-pandemia e 185 no período pandêmico. A maioria das pacientes durante a pandemia era solteira, sem comorbidades, teve gravidez não planejada e optou por iniciar método anticoncepcional após a alta hospitalar. Não houve tendência significativa para mudanças no número de interrupções legais ou complicações. As complicações foram associadas a: falha do método contraceptivo (razão de chances [RC] 2,44; intervalo de confiança [IC] 95% 1,23–4,84), idade gestacional (RC 1,126; IC 95% 1,039–1,219) e preparo do colo uterino com misoprostol (RC 1,99; IC 95% 1,01–3,96).
Conclusão Não houve diferenças significativas na duração dos sintomas, transporte ao hospital ou tendência de redução do número de abortos legais e aumento de complicações. O perfil das pacientes provavelmente reflete o impacto da pandemia no planejamento familiar.
Keywords
CLAP MUSA network - perinatal information system - population surveillance - abortion - EviSIP - COVID-19Palavras-chave
rede CLAP MUSA - sistema de informação perinatal - vigilância populacional - aborto - EviSIP - COVID-19Contributions
P. B. F. D., A. A. J., C. C. N., N. V. J. and L. F. B. contributed to project development, data collection, study conception and design. P. B. F. D. wrote the manuscript. N. N. V. J. and L. F. B. reviewed and edited the final version. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Publication History
Received: 04 June 2022
Accepted: 08 September 2022
Article published online:
27 April 2023
© 2023. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Spurlin EE, Han ES, Silver ER, May BL, Tatonetti NP, Ingra MA. et al. Where have all the emergencies gone? The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on obstetric and gynecologic procedures and consults at a New York City Hospital. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28 (07) 1411-1419.e1 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.012.
- 2 Masroor S. Collateral damage of COVID-19 pandemic: Delayed medical care. J Card Surg 2020; 35 (06) 1345-1347 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14638.
- 3 Romanis EC, Parsons JA, Hodson N. COVID-19 and reproductive justice in Great Britain and the United States: ensuring access to abortion care during a global pandemic. J Law Biosci 2020; 7 (01) lsaa027 DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa027.
- 4 Gupta S, Maghsoudlou P, Ajao M, Ivar Einarsson J, Perkins King L. Analysis of COVID-19 response and impact on gynecologic surgery at a large academic hospital system. JSLS 2021; 25 (04) 21-56
- 5 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Joint statement on abortion access during the COVID-19 outbreak [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 17]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2020/03/joint-statement-on-abortionaccess-during-the-covid-19-outbreak
- 6 Serruya SJ, Gómez Ponce de León R, Bahamondes MV, De MucioB, Costa ML, Durán P. et al. EviSIP: using evidence to change practice through mentorship - an innovative experience for reproductive health in the Latin American and Caribbean regions. Glob Health Action 2020; 13 (01) 1811482 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1811482.
- 7 Domingues RMSM, Fonseca SC, Leal MDC, Aquino EML, Menezes GMS. Aborto inseguro no Brasil: revisão sistemática da produção científica, 2008-2018. Cad Saude Publica 2020; 36 (36, Suppl 1) e00190418 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00190418.
- 8 Chen KL, Brozen M, Rollman JE, Ward T, Norris KC, Gregory KD, Zimmerman FJ. How is the COVID-19 pandemic shaping transportation access to health care?. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 2021; 10: 100338 DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100338.
- 9 Riley T, Sully E, Ahmed Z, Biddlecom A. Estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health in low-and middle-income countries. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2020; 46: 73-76 DOI: 10.1363/46e9020.
- 10 Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Área Técnica de Saúde da Mulher. Atenção humanizada ao abortamento: norma técnica. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2005
- 11 World Health Organization. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. Geneva: WHO; 2013
- 12 Pilecco FB, McCallum CA, Almeida MDCC, Alves FJO, Rocha AS, Ortelan N. et al. Abortion and the COVID-19 pandemic: insights for Latin America. Cad Saude Publica 2021; 37 (06) e00322320 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00322320.
- 13 Cavalari CAA, Veiga-Junior NN, Kajiura BD, Eugeni C, Tavares BVG, Baccaro LF. Factors associated with abortion complications after the implementation of a surveillance network (MUSA Network) in a University Hospital. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021; 43 (07) 507-512 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735129.
- 14 Lerma K, Blumenthal PD. Current and potential methods for second trimester abortion. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 63: 24-36 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.006.
- 15 Ralph JA, Shulman LP. Adjunctive agents for cervical preparation in second trimester surgical abortion. Adv Ther 2019; 36 (06) 1246-1251 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-00953-2.
- 16 Constant D, Kluge J, Harries J, Grossman D. An analysis of delays among women accessing second-trimester abortion in the public sector in South Africa. Contraception 2019; 100 (03) 209-213 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.009.
- 17 Di Mascio D, Khalil A, Saccone G, Rizzo G, Buca D, Liberati M. et al. Outcome of coronavirus spectrum infections (SARS, MERS, COVID-19) during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2 (02) 100107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100107.
- 18 Newmann S, Dalve-Endres A, Drey EA. Society of Family Planning. Clinical guidelines. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks' gestation. Contraception 2008; 77 (04) 308-314 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.01.0040.
- 19 Veiga-Junior NN, Cavalari CA, Eugeni C, Kajiura BD, Stefano N, Baccaro LF. Post-abortion contraception before hospital discharge after installation of a surveillance network in Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 150 (02) 200-205 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13170.