Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758633
Fistulotomy versus Fistulectomy for Fistula-in-Ano: A Randomized Prospective Study
Funding The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
Abstract
Background Fistula-in-ano is common surgical ailment yet challenging to treat. Current management remains majorly dependent on two conventional surgical options (fistulotomy and fistulectomy), surgeon's preference, and their experience.
Methods This prospective, randomized study was conducted to compare fistulotomy with fistulectomy in the management of patients with simple fistula-in-ano. Fifty patients were recruited and randomized into two groups each containing 25 patients: group I was managed by fistulotomy and group II was managed by fistulectomy. The outcomes of the study include operating time, postsurgery hospital stay, wound healing time, postoperative pain, and postoperative complications.
Results Of the 50 patients, 11 (22%) were female and 39 (78%) were male with a mean age of 40.62 ± 12.86 years. The operating time in patients in the fistulotomy group was 21.96 ± 1.90 minutes and in the fistulectomy group was 31.32 ± 2.99 minutes (p ≤ 0.001). The mean postsurgical hospital stay in the fistulotomy group was 1.32 ± 0.47 days and in the fistulectomy group was 2.32 ± 0.69 days (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. Mean Visual Analog Scale score was higher in fistulectomy when compared with the fistulotomy at 6 hours and at discharge (p ≤ 0.05). Postoperative complications were also found to be less in fistulotomy patients compared with patients who underwent fistulectomy.
Conclusion In comparison to a fistulectomy, fistulotomy has a slight edge in terms of operating time, postsurgery hospital stay, wound healing time, postoperative pain, and postoperative complications. Fistulotomy yielded better results than fistulectomy and we recommend fistulotomy procedure as a treatment of choice in patients with simple low lying fistula-in-ano.
Ethics Committee Approval
Ethics Committee approval (EC/PG-34/2018) was received for this study from the Ethics Committee of M. S. Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, India.
Informed Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Publication History
Received: 25 January 2022
Accepted: 13 October 2022
Article published online:
22 November 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 The Internet Classics Archive | On Fistulae by Hippocrates. Accessed December 13, 2021, at: http://classics.mit.edu/Hippocrates/fistulae.4.4.html
- 2 Jimenez M, Mandava N. Anorectal Fistula. 2022 Sep 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan–. PMID: 32809492.
- 3 Samaranayake GCP, Pushpakumara AAJ, Peiris KPP. Comparative Study on Different Treatment Modules in the Management of Fistula-In-Ano (Bhagandara). International Journal of Current Advanced Research. 2020; 09 (06) 22407-22411
- 4 Litta F, Parello A, Ferri L. et al. Simple fistula-in-ano: is it all simple? A systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2021; 25 (04) 385-399
- 5 Xu Y, Liang S, Tang W. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing fistulectomy versus fistulotomy for low anal fistula. Springerplus 2016; 5 (01) 1722
- 6 Ratto C, Litta F, Donisi L, Parello A. Fistulotomy or fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula (FIPS): a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19 (07) 391-400
- 7 Kronborg O. To lay open or excise a fistula-in-ano: a randomized trial. Br J Surg 1985; 72 (12) 970-970
- 8 Khubchandani M. Comparison of results of treatment of fistula-in-ano. J R Soc Med 1984; 77 (05) 369-371
- 9 Jain BK, Vaibhaw K, Garg PK, Gupta S, Mohanty D. Comparison of a fistulectomy and a fistulotomy with marsupialization in the management of a simple anal fistula: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2012; 28 (02) 78-82
- 10 Barase AK, Shinde AM. A comparative study of fistulotomy and fistulectomy in management of simple fistula in ano. Int Surg J 2018; 5 (11) 3704-3706
- 11 Elsebai OI, Elsesy AA, Ammar MS, Khatan AM. Fistulectomy versus fistulotomy in the management of simple perianal fistula. Menoufia Med J 2016; 29 (03) 564
- 12 Barad DSV, Desai DS, Patel DN. Endodontic analyzing the effect of four different beverages on surface roughness of two different types of resin composites at different time intervals: an in vitro study. Paripex Indian J Res 2020; 9 (02) 144-146
- 13 Murtaza G, Shaikh FA, Chawla T, Rajput BU, Shahzad N, Ansari S. Fistulotomy versus fistulectomy for simple fistula in ano: a retrospective cohort study. J Pak Med Assoc 2017; 67 (03) 339-342
- 14 Ganesan R, Karunakaran K, Anandan H. A comparative study between fistulotomy and fistulectomy in management of low anal fistulae. Int Surg J 2017; 4 (11) 3665-3669
- 15 Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10 (05) 420-430
- 16 Vogel JD, Johnson EK, Morris AM. et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of anorectal abscess, fistula-in-ano, and rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (12) 1117-1133
- 17 Chalya PL, Mabula JB. Fistulectomy versus fistulotomy with marsupialisation in the treatment of low fistula-in- ano: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Tanzan J Health Res 2013; 15 (03) 193-198
- 18 Ho YH, Tan M, Leong AFPK, Seow-Choen F. Marsupialization of fistulotomy wounds improves healing: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 1998; 85 (01) 105-107
- 19 Pescatori M, Ayabaca SM, Cafaro D, Iannello A, Magrini S. Marsupialization of fistulotomy and fistulectomy wounds improves healing and decreases bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8 (01) 11-14