Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 71(07): 550-556
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757893
Original Cardiovascular

Thrombocytopenia after Implantation of the Perceval, Intuity, and Sapien Aortic Valve Prostheses

Authors

  • Achim Haeussler

    1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, City Hospital of Zurich – Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Vasileios Ntinopoulos

    1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, City Hospital of Zurich – Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Laura Rings

    1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, City Hospital of Zurich – Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Nestoras Papadopoulos

    1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, City Hospital of Zurich – Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Gojart Hoti

    1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, City Hospital of Zurich – Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Philine Fleckenstein

    1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, City Hospital of Zurich – Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Omer Dzemali

    1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, City Hospital of Zurich – Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Background An increased incidence of thrombocytopenia was reported after implantation of the LivaNova Perceval and the Edwards Sapien aortic valve bioprostheses. Aim of this study is to assess the perioperative platelet count and bleeding complications in three different types of aortic valve bioprostheses intended for high-risk patients, the sutureless LivaNova Perceval, the rapid deployment Edwards Intuity, and the transcatheter Edwards Sapien.

Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the perioperative data of patients receiving the Perceval, Intuity, and Sapien aortic valve bioprosthesis. The platelet count was collected preoperatively, at nadir postoperatively, and at discharge. The bioprostheses were compared for between-group differences in platelet count and postoperative bleeding complications.

Results Overall, 37 patients received the Perceval, 42 the Intuity, and 58 the Sapien bioprosthesis. There was no significant between-group difference in the preoperative platelet count [Perceval 203(178–246)G/l, Intuity 214(190–232)G/l, Sapien 201(178–275)G/l, p = 0.800]. There was a significant between-group difference in the postoperative platelet count, both at nadir value [Perceval 57(37–80)G/l, Intuity 91(73–109)G/l, Sapien 126(105–170)G/l, p < 0.0001] and at discharge [Perceval 150(83–257)G/l, Intuity 239(200–343)G/l, Sapien 232(179–284)G/l, p = 0.001]. There was no significant between-group difference regarding red blood cell transfusions (p = 0.242), platelet transfusions (p = 0.656), and rethoracotomy for bleeding (p = 0.847).

Conclusion We found a significant platelet count reduction in all three bioprostheses which was more marked in the Perceval group. The platelet count reduction was transient and fully recovered in the Intuity and Sapien groups, whereas the Perceval group showed only a partial platelet count recovery. However, bleeding complications were not different between the three bioprostheses.



Publication History

Received: 12 May 2022

Accepted: 06 September 2022

Article published online:
03 December 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany