PDF herunterladen
Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38(06): 668-678
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757758
Original Article

Tesla Facelifting Using Energy Devices during Rhytidectomy

Richard Gentile
1   Facial Plastic and Aesthetic Laser Center, Youngstown, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Tesla facelifting is the process of utilizing energy devices as surgical tools during rhytidectomy and neck lifting. Devices used for Tesla face and neck lifting include fiber lasers, radio frequency devices, high-frequency ultrasound, and plasma energy devices. Advantage of Tesla face and neck lifting include better visualization for surgical intervention due to reduced bleeding, better access to hard to access facial and neck locations, and long-term skin tightening from the subdermal energy treatment.

Keywords

Tesla facelift - energy-based devices - Renuvion - FaceTite - Vaser


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Dezember 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Population of the U.S. by sex and age 2017 Statistic. https://www.statista.com/statistics/241488/population-of-the-us-by-sex-and-age/ Population of the United States by sex and age 2017 There were about 11.35 million males between the ages of 20 and 24-years-old in the United States in
    PubMed
  • 2 Arnoczky SP, Aksan A. Thermal modification of connective tissues: basic science considerations and clinical implications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8 (05) 305-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ross EV, Yashar SS, Naseef GS. et al. A pilot study of in vivo immediate tissue contraction with CO2 skin laser resurfacing in a live farm pig. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25 (11) 851-856
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 le Lous M, Flandin F, Herbage D, Allain JC. Influence of collagen denaturation on the chemorheological properties of skin, assessed by differential scanning calorimetry and hydrothermal isometric tension measurement. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982; 717 (02) 295-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hsu TS, Kaminer MS. The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2003; 22 (02) 115-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Barton JK, Rollins A, Yazdanfar S, Pfefer TJ, Westphal V, Izatt JA. Photothermal coagulation of blood vessels: a comparison of high-speed optical coherence tomography and numerical modelling. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46 (06) 1665-1678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gentile RD. . Smartlifting ™-A technological Innovation for Facial Rejuvenation. Cynosure white paper. Accessed September 18, 2022, at: www.dcanavan.com/PDFS/Collateral/Compendium.pdf
    PubMed
  • 8 Gentile RD. Smartlifting ™-A technological innovation for facial rejuvenation. Lasers Surg Med 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gentile RD. . LaserFacialSculpting™ Minimally Invasive Techniques for Facial Rejuvenation Utilizing the Smartlipo™ Nd:YAG Laser February 1, 2010. Accessed September 18, 2022, at: http://66.36.229.213/live/cynosureapp/Smartlipo_MPX_TP/smartlook_smartlifting/921-0187-000_r2_LaserFacialSculptingWP.pdf
    PubMed
  • 10 Gentile RD. SmartLifting fiber laser-assisted facial rejuvenation techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (02) 371-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gentile RD. Laser-assisted neck-lift: high-tech contouring and tightening. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (04) 331-345
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dinh V. 2006. Low-Power Laser Therapy. Biomedical Photonics Handbook. CRC Press; , pp. 48-1-48-25
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Lubart R, Friedmann H, Lavie R. et al. A reasonable mechanism for visible light-induced skin rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci 2007; 22 (01) 1-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pereira AN, Eduardo CdeP, Matson E, Marques MM. Effect of low-power laser irradiation on cell growth and procollagen synthesis of cultured fibroblasts. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 31 (04) 263-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rattan SI. Repeated mild heat shock delays ageing in cultured human skin fibroblasts. Biochem Mol Biol Int 1998; 45 (04) 753-759
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Watanabe S. Basics of laser application to dermatology. Arch Dermatol Res 2008; 300 (Suppl. 01) S21-S30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Snoeckx LHEH, Cornelussen RN, Van Nieuwenhoven FA, Reneman RS, Van Der Vusse GJ. Heat shock proteins and cardiovascular pathophysiology. Physiol Rev 2001; 81 (04) 1461-1497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wilkinson ER. Textbook of Dermatology. Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Geronemus RG. Fractional photothermolysis: current and future applications. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38 (03) 169-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gilchrest BA. A review of skin ageing and its medical therapy. Br J Dermatol 1996; a 135 (06) 867-875
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sadick NS. Update on non-ablative light therapy for rejuvenation: a review. Lasers Surg Med 2003; 32 (02) 120-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Goldberg DJ. Lasers for facial rejuvenation. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4 (04) 225-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Capon A, Mordon S. Can thermal lasers promote skin wound healing?. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg 1998; 176 (2A, Suppl): 26S-38S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bowers W, Blaha M, Alkhyyat A. et al. Artificial human skin: cytokine, prostaglandin, Hsp70 and histological responses to heat exposure. J Dermatol Sci 1999; 20 (03) 172-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kovalchin JT, Wang R, Wagh MS, Azoulay J, Sanders M, Chandawarkar RY. In vivo delivery of heat shock protein 70 accelerates wound healing by up-regulating macrophage-mediated phagocytosis. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14 (02) 129-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Marshall H, Kind CN. Detection and cellular localization of stress-induced 72 kD heat shock protein in cultured Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 8 (04) 545-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ohtsuka K, Laszlo A. The relationship between hsp 70 localization and heat resistance. Exp Cell Res 1992; 202 (02) 507-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Souil E, Capon A, Mordon S, Dinh-Xuan AT, Polla BS, Bachelet M. Treatment with 815-nm diode laser induces long-lasting expression of 72-kDa heat shock protein in normal rat skin. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144 (02) 260-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Naitoh M, Hosokawa N, Kubota H. et al. Upregulation of HSP47 and collagen type III in the dermal fibrotic disease, keloid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 280 (05) 1316-1322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tasab M, Jenkinson L, Bulleid NJ. Sequence-specific recognition of collagen triple helices by the collagen-specific molecular chaperone HSP47. J Biol Chem 2002; 277 (38) 35007-35012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Verrico AK, Haylett AK, Moore JV. In vivo expression of the collagen-related heat shock protein HSP47, following hyperthermia or photodynamic therapy. Lasers Med Sci 2001; 16 (03) 192-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Verrico AK, Moore JV. Expression of the collagen-related heat shock protein HSP47 in fibroblasts treated with hyperthermia or photodynamic therapy. Br J Cancer 1997; 76 (06) 719-724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Frank S, Oliver L, Lebreton-De Coster C. et al. Infrared radiation affects the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in human fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol 2004; 123 (05) 823-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hirano S, Shelden EA, Gilmont RR. HSP27 regulates fibroblast adhesion, motility, and matrix contraction. Cell Stress Chaperones 2004; 9 (01) 29-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Farber JL, Rubin E. Pathology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Paul M Three Dimensional Radiofrequecy Tissue Tightening. A proposed mechanism and applications for Bo. dy Contouring Aesth. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2011; 35: 87-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Mehta-Ambalal SR. Neocollagenesis and neoelastinogenesis: from the laboratory to the clinic. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2016; 9 (03) 145-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Greenhalgh DG. The role of apoptosis in wound healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1998; 30 (09) 1019-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 DiPietro LA, Burns AL. , Eds. 2003. Wound Healing: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Medicine. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press;
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mirastschijski U, Haaksma CJ, Tomasek JJ, Agren MS. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor GM 6001 attenuates keratinocyte migration, contraction and myofibroblast formation in skin wounds. Exp Cell Res 2004; 299 (02) 465-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hinz B. Masters and servants of the force: the role of matrix adhesions in myofibroblast force perception and transmission. Eur J Cell Biol 2006; 85 (3-4): 175-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Deodhar AK, Rana RE. Surgical physiology of wound healing: a review. J Postgrad Med 1997; 43 (02) 52-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar