Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2023; 08(02): e81-e87
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757322
Original Article

Sensory and Functional Recovery after Suprafascial Free Flap in Foot and Ankle Reconstruction

Nutthawut Akaranuchat
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Natthapong Kongkunnavat
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The goals of foot and ankle defect reconstruction include weight-bearing and shearing tolerance, good mobilization, regaining protective sensation, and good contour for footwear fitting. This study reports the outcomes of foot and ankle defect reconstruction with suprafascial free flaps relative to sensory and functional recovery.

Methods Eleven suprafascial free flaps were performed, which were supra-Scarpa fascial flaps in seven cases. Sensory recovery was assessed by Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (SWMT), and functional outcomes were measured using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire at preoperative and subsequent visits.

Results Eleven cases (age range: 21–83 years, seven males, mean body mass index: 24.8 kg/m2) were operated and the mean defect size was 109.8 cm2. The anterolateral thigh, medial sural artery perforator, and superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flaps were used. The mean flap thickness was 0.8 cm. Average flap harvesting time and operative time were 83.9 and 452.0 minutes. Half of cases achieved 10 g SWMT (two cases regained baseline sensation) by 6-months post-operation, and all cases regained either 10 g SWMT or baseline sensation within 12 months. Significant improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) and sports subscales was observed at 3 months (p < 0.05). Significant improvement in the global function rating scale for both ADL and sports was achieved by 6 months (p < 0.05). None experienced the recurrent ulcer.

Conclusion Suprafascial free flap is a good reconstruction strategy for managing complex foot and ankle defects that yields favorable outcomes including adequate protective sensation and significant functional improvement.

Keywords

suprafascial free flap - reconstruction - sensation - functional outcomes - lower extremity

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 12 January 2022

Accepted: 29 May 2022

Article published online:
17 December 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Schusterman MA, Miller MJ, Reece GP, Kroll SS, Marchi M, Goepfert H. A single center's experience with 308 free flaps for repair of head and neck cancer defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (03) 472-478 , discussion 479–480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Percival NJ, Sykes PJ, Earley MJ. Free flap surgery: the Welsh Regional Unit experience. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42 (04) 435-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kruavit A, Visuthikosol V, Srimuninnimit V, Punyahotra N. 10-year-free flaps at Ramathibodi Hospital. Journal of the International College of Surgeons of Thailand. 1998; 41: 45-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Irons GB, Wood MB, Schmitt III EH. Experience with one hundred consecutive free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1987; 18 (01) 17-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Harashina T. Analysis of 200 free flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1988; 41 (01) 33-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wettstein R, Schürch R, Banic A, Erni D, Harder Y. Review of 197 consecutive free flap reconstructions in the lower extremity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (07) 772-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Urken ML, Buchbinder D, Costantino PD. et al. Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite flaps: report of 210 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124 (01) 46-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Suh JD, Sercarz JA, Abemayor E. et al. Analysis of outcome and complications in 400 cases of microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (08) 962-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Shpitzer T, Neligan PC, Gullane PJ. et al. Oromandibular reconstruction with the fibular free flap. Analysis of 50 consecutive flaps. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123 (09) 939-944
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake F, Li L, Schmelzle R, Heiland M. Outcome and complications of 540 microvascular free flaps: the Hamburg experience. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11 (01) 89-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H. et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (06) 363-368 , discussion 369
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kelly JL, Eadie PA, Orr D, Al-Rawi M, O'Donnell M, Lawlor D. Prospective evaluation of outcome measures in free-flap surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20 (06) 435-438 , discussion 439
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hamdi M, Weiler-Mithoff EM, Webster MH. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (01) 86-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Eckardt A, Meyer A, Laas U, Hausamen JE. Reconstruction of defects in the head and neck with free flaps: 20 years experience. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 45 (01) 11-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Hidalgo DA, Hu QY. Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (05) 1314-1320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Classen DA, Ward H. Complications in a consecutive series of 250 free flap operations. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (05) 557-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Acosta R, Smit JM, Audolfsson T. et al. A clinical review of 9 years of free perforator flap breast reconstructions: an analysis of 675 flaps and the influence of new techniques on clinical practice. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (02) 91-98
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rodriguez ED, Bluebond-Langner R, Copeland C, Grim TN, Singh NK, Scalea T. Functional outcomes of posttraumatic lower limb salvage: a pilot study of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps versus muscle flaps. J Trauma 2009; 66 (05) 1311-1314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hong JP, Shin HW, Kim JJ, Wei FC, Chung YK. The use of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps in chronic osteomyelitis of the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (01) 142-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hallock GG. A paradigm shift in flap selection protocols for zones of the lower extremity using perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (04) 233-240
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Akaranuchat N. Lower extremity reconstruction with vascularized free-tissue transfer: 20 years of experience in the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Siriraj Medical Journal. 2021; 73 (07) 462-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Narushima M, Yamasoba T, Iida T. et al. Pure skin perforator flaps: the anatomical vascularity of the super-thin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (03) 351e-360e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hong JP, Chung IW. The superficial fascia as a new plane of elevation for anterolateral thigh flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (02) 192-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: a systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness of tests. J Hand Surg [Br] 2005; 30 (03) 252-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Carrer P, Trevisan C, Curreri C. et al. Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for predicting physical performance and the risk of falls in older people: results of the Pro.V.A. longitudinal study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99 (01) 137-143.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26 (11) 968-983
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Arunakul M, Arunakul P, Suesiritumrong C, Angthong C, Chernchujit B. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM) subjective form. J Med Assoc Thai 2015; 98 (06) 561-567
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2219-2226 , discussion 2227–2230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Diamond S, Seth AK, Chattha AS, Iorio ML. Outcomes of subfascial, suprafascial, and super-thin anterolateral thigh flaps: tailoring thickness without added morbidity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (03) 176-184
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Seth AK, Iorio ML. Super-thin and suprafascial anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (07) 466-473
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Thiele JR, Weiß J, Braig D, Zeller J, Stark GB, Eisenhardt SU. Evaluation of the suprafascial thin ALT flap in foot and ankle reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (02) 151-159
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar