CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2023; 58(03): 507-513
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756326
Artigo Original
Quadril

Pipkin Type-II Femoral Head Fracture – A Biomechanical Evaluation by the Finite-Element Method[*]

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
1   Hospital Regional do Gama, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil
2   Departamento de Ortopedia, Instituto de Pesquisa e Ensino, Hospital Ortopédico e Medicina Especializada (IPE-HOME), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil
,
1   Hospital Regional do Gama, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil
,
2   Departamento de Ortopedia, Instituto de Pesquisa e Ensino, Hospital Ortopédico e Medicina Especializada (IPE-HOME), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil
,
3   Departamento de Ortopedia e Anestesiologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
,
4   Departamento do Aparelho Locomotor, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil
,
5   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Nova Monteiro, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the biomechanical capacity of two forms of fixation for Pipkin type-II fractures, describing the vertical fracture deviation, the maximum and minimum principal stresses, and the Von Mises equivalent stress in the syntheses used.

Materials and Methods Two internal fasteners were developed to treat Pipkin type-II fractures through finite elements: a 3.5-mm cortical screw and a Herbert screw. Under the same conditions, the vertical fracture deviation, the maximum and minimum principal stresses, and the Von Mises equivalent stress in the syntheses used were evaluated.

Results The vertical displacements evaluated were of 1.5 mm and 0.5 mm. The maximum principal stress values obtained in the upper region of the femoral neck were of 9.7 KPa and 1.3 Kpa, and the minimum principal stress values obtained in the lower region of the femoral neck were of -8.7 KPa and -9.3 KPa. Finally, the peak values for Von Mises stress were of 7.2 GPa and 2.0 GPa for the fixation models with the use of the 3.5-mm cortical screw and the Herbert screw respectively.

Conclusion The fixation system with the Herbert screw generated the best results in terms of reduction of vertical displacement, distribution of the maximum principal stress, and the peak Von Mises equivalent stress, demonstrating mechanical superiority compared to that of the 3.5-mm cortical screw in the treatment of Pipkin type-II fractures.

Financial Support

The authors declare that they have received no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources pertaining to the conduction of the present study.


* Work developed at Instituto de Pesquisa e Ensino, Hospital Ortopédico e Medicina Especializada (IPE-HOME), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. Januar 2022

Angenommen: 26. Juli 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. Oktober 2022

© 2022. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • Referências

  • 1 Butler JE. Pipkin Type-II fractures of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63 (08) 1292-1296
  • 2 Uzel AP, Laflamme GY, Rouvillain JL. Irreducible Pipkin II femoral head fractures: Is transgluteal approach the best strategy?. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96 (06) 695-701
  • 3 Wang CG, Li YM, Zhang HF, Li H, Li ZJ. Anterior approach versus posterior approach for Pipkin I and II femoral head fractures: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2016; 27: 176-181
  • 4 Romeo NM, Firoozabadi R. Classifications in Brief: The Pipkin Classification of Femoral Head Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (05) 1114-1119
  • 5 Giannoudis PV, Kontakis G, Christoforakis Z, Akula M, Tosounidis T, Koutras C. Management, complications and clinical results of femoral head fractures. Injury 2009; 40 (12) 1245-1251
  • 6 Pipkin G. Treatment of grade IV fracture-dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957; 39-A (05) 1027-1042 , passim
  • 7 Kim JW, Kim JH. Updates on Treatment of Femoral Head Fractures. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2015; 50 (03) 171-177
  • 8 Zaizi A, Benomar HA, Fekhaoui MR, Grimi T, Boufettal M, Berrada MS. Bilateral posterior hip dislocation associated with right Pipkin II fracture: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2019; 61: 103-106
  • 9 Scolaro JA, Marecek G, Firoozabadi R, Krieg JC, Routt MLC. Management and radiographic outcomes of femoral head fractures. J Orthop Traumatol 2017; 18 (03) 235-241
  • 10 Murray P, McGee HM, Mulvihill N. Fixation of femoral head fractures using the Herbert screw. Injury 1988; 19 (03) 220-221
  • 11 Wang J, Cai L, Xie L, Chen H, Guo X, Yu K. 3D printing-based Ganz approach for treatment of femoral head fractures: a prospective analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14 (01) 338
  • 12 Stannard JP, Harris HW, Volgas DA, Alonso JE. Functional outcome of patients with femoral head fractures associated with hip dislocations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (377) 44-56
  • 13 Samsami S, Saberi S, Sadighi S, Rouhi G. Comparison of Three Fixation Methods for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: Experimental and Numerical Investigations. J Med Biol Eng 2015; 35 (05) 566-579
  • 14 Noda M, Saegusa Y, Takahashi M, Tezuka D, Adachi K, Naoi K. Biomechanical Study Using the Finite Element Method of Internal Fixation in Pauwels Type III Vertical Femoral Neck Fractures. Arch Trauma Res 2015; 4 (03) e23167
  • 15 Radcliffe IA, Taylor M. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007; 22 (07) 780-786