Telemedicine Effectiveness in the First Elective Orthopedic Care Compared to a Standard Face-to-face Visit

Abstract

Objective The study aimed to compare whether the diagnoses of orthopedic diseases at telemedicine (TM) consultations are the same as those established at face-to-face visits.

Method Primary, observational, prospective, analytical study, with subjects from the local municipal network who were referred to the orthopedics outpatient clinic from May to June 2021. Subjects underwent two assessments: a telemedicine (TM) consultation and a face-to-face (FF) visit. Two different physicians attended to the patients and established a diagnosis. The physician performing the FF visit was not aware of the previous diagnoses. We compared the diagnoses obtained at both modalities to assess the degree of similarity. In addition, we determined the time required for consultations and the degree of satisfaction of the physicians.

Results We evaluated 43 patients and seven physicians, totaling 44 TM and 43 FF visits. The diagnostic similarity index was 81.4%. TM consultations were shorter (mean time, 4.8 minutes) than FF visits. Physicians were less satisfied with TM in the four criteria evaluated (respective scores of 79.1, 23.3, 46.6, and 37.2).

Conclusion TM consultations have a diagnoses agreement higher than 80% compared with FF visits. On the other hand, TM consultations were faster, and physicians were less satisfied with them in comparison with FF visits.

Keywords

treatment adherence and compliance - diagnosis - orthopedics - teleconsultation

Study developed at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 04. März 2022

Angenommen: 18. Juli 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. Oktober 2022

• Referências

• 1 Tachakra S, Wang XH, Istepanian RS, Song YH. Mobile e-health: the unwired evolution of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2003; 9 (03) 247-257
• 2 Baker J, Stanley A. Telemedicine technology: a review of services, equipment, and other aspects. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2018; 18 (11) 60
• 3 Makhni MC, Riew GJ, Sumathipala MG. Telemedicine in orthopaedic surgery: challenges and opportunities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102 (13) 1109-1115
• 4 Brasil. Diário oficial da união. Lei 13989 de 15 de abril de 2020. Dispõe sobre o uso da telemedicina durante a crise causada pelo coronavírus. Brasilia: DOU, 2020. (Publicado em 16/04/2020. Edição:73, Seção:1, Página 1)
• 5 Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G, Småbrekke A, Wilsgaard T. Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16 (01) 483
• 6 Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G, Småbrekke A, Wilsgaard T. Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: A randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 2019; 25 (08) 451-459
• 7 Haider Z, Aweid B, Subramanian P, Iranpour F. Telemedicine in orthopaedics and its potential applications during COVID-19 and beyond: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2022; 28 (06) 291-403
• 8 Buvik A, Bergmo TS, Bugge E, Smaabrekke A, Wilsgaard T, Olsen JA. Cost- Effectiveness of telemedicine in remote orthopedic consultations: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (02) e11330
• 9 Cottrell MA, O'Leary SP, Swete-Kelly P. et al. Agreement between telehealth and in-person assessment of patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions presenting to an advanced-practice physiotherapy screening clinic. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2018; 38: 99-105
• 10 Nakagawa K, Kvedar J, Yellowlees P. Retail outlets using telehealth pose significant policy questions for health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018; 37 (12) 2069-2075
• 11 Brennan JA, Kealy JA, Gerardi LH. et al. Telemedicine in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 1999; 5 (01) 18-22