Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49(06): 724-728
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756294
Breast/Trunk
Case Report

Vulvar Reconstruction Using Keystone Flaps Based on the Perforators of Three Arteries

Yunjae Lee 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
,
Sanghun Lee 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
,
Dongkyu Lee 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
,
Hyeonjung Yeo 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
,
Hannara Park 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
,
Hyochun Park 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Various flaps are used to reconstruct skin and soft tissue defects of the vulva following resection of malignancies. Whenever possible, reconstruction using local flaps is the standard treatment. Here, we describe vulvar defect reconstruction using keystone flaps. Standard keystone flaps are based on randomly located vascular perforators. However, we designed a keystone flap that includes perforators of three named arteries (the anterior labial artery of the external pudendal artery, cutaneous branches of the obturator artery, and posterior labial artery of the internal pudendal artery) and the pudendal nerve, which accompanies the internal pudendal artery. Four patients with squamous cell carcinoma and extramammary Paget's disease of the vulva underwent radical vulvectomy and keystone flaps including perforators of three arteries. Depending on the morphology of the defects, keystone flaps were used with different designs. For elliptical and unilateral vulvar defects, a standard keystone flap was designed, and for defects on both sides of the vulva, a double opposing keystone flap was used. For oval defects, the omega variant keystone flap was designed, and when the morphology of the defect needed rotation of the flap, a rotational keystone flap was designed. All the patients showed good function and sensation, with an acceptable cosmetic appearance.

Keywords

surgical procedures - local flap - artery - perineum - vulva

Authors' Contributions

Y.L. was responsible for data curation, methodology, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing; S.L. was responsible for data curation, visualization, writing—review and editing; D.L. was responsible for data curation, visualization, writing—review and editing; H.Y. was responsible for formal analysis, writing—review and editing; H.P. was responsible for formal analysis, writing—review and editing; H.P. was responsible for conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing.


Note

This article was presented as a poster at the 10th Research and Reconstruction (R&R) Forum on July 24–25, 2020, Korea.


Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Daegu Fatima Hospital (IRB No. DFE21ORIO106) and performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.


Patient Consent

The patients provided written informed consent for the publication and the use of their images.




Publication History

Received: 23 November 2021

Accepted: 21 January 2022

Article published online:
13 December 2022

© 2022. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Tan BK, Kang GC-W, Tay EH, Por YC. Subunit principle of vulvar reconstruction: algorithm and outcomes. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (04) 379-386
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tham NL, Pan WR, Rozen WM. et al. The pudendal thigh flap for vaginal reconstruction: optimising flap survival. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (05) 826-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lee PK, Choi MS, Ahn ST, Oh DY, Rhie JW, Han KT. Gluteal fold V-Y advancement flap for vulvar and vaginal reconstruction: a new flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (02) 401-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 John HE, Jessop ZM, Di Candia M, Simcock J, Durrani AJ, Malata CM. An algorithmic approach to perineal reconstruction after cancer resection–experience from two international centers. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (01) 96-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Behan FC. The keystone design perforator island flap in reconstructive surgery. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (03) 112-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rini IS, Gunardi AJ, Marsaulina RP, Aryandono T, Dachlan I, Dwiprahasto I. A systematic review of the keystone design perforator island flap in the reconstruction of trunk defects. Arch Plast Surg 2020; 47 (06) 535-541
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Behan FC, Rozen WM, Lo CH, Findlay M. The omega - Ω - variant designs (types A and B) of the keystone perforator island flap. ANZ J Surg 2011; 81 (09) 650-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kim SH, Seo BC, Oh DY. et al. A new flap for 3-dimensional vulvar and vaginal reconstruction: the “butterfly flap”. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 37: 847-849
    Google Scholar