Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2022; 80(09): 914-921
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755323
Original Article

Feasibility of telemedicine for patients with parkinsonism in the Brazilian public health system

Viabilidade da telemedicina para pacientes com parkinsonismo no sistema público de saúde brasileiro
Daniel Teixeira Santos 
1   Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
2   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
Daniel Monte Freire Camelo 
1   Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
2   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
Matheus Zschornack Strelow 
1   Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
2   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
Maysa Tayane Santos Silva 
3   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
Paula Führ 
3   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
Letícia Winer Marins 
3   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
,
Artur Francisco Schumacher-Schuh 
1   Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
4   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Telemedicine for patients with parkinsonism is feasible, cost-effective and satisfactory. However, the feasibility of this modality of care for this subpopulation is not known in real-life scenarios of developing countries like Brazil.

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of telemedicine for patients with parkinsonism in a developing country.

Methods A cross-sectional study with patients with parkinsonism treated in the Brazilian public healthcare system. We included 130 patients, who were contacted by telephone; those who could be reached underwent a structured interview for data collection. The primary outcomes were the feasibility of teleconsultations and video consultations, but we also performed a logistic regression regarding the feasibility of a video consultation and associated factors.

Results Telemedicine was feasible and accepted by 69 (53.08%) patients regarding teleconsultations and by 50 (38.5%) patients regarding video consultations. Teleconsultations were feasible for 80.2%, and video consultations were feasible for 58.1% of the patients reachable through telephone calls. Having a higher family income was positively correlated with the feasibility for a video consultation while a negative association was observed regarding being married or in a stable union and having a low level of schooling.

Conclusions A significant proportion of patients with parkinsonism in a developing country are unreachable, unwilling, or unable to participate in telemedicine. Among the reachable patients, feasibility is higher but still lower than what is reported in studies in developed countries. Family income, level of schooling, and marital status were associated with the feasibility of video consultations.

Resumo

Antecedentes A telemedicina para pacientes com parkinsonismo é viável, econômica e satisfatória. No entanto, a viabilidade dessa modalidade de atendimento para essa subpopulação não é conhecida no cenário da vida real de países em desenvolvimento como o Brasil.

Objetivo Avaliar a viabilidade da telemedicina para pacientes com parkinsonismo em um país em desenvolvimento.

Métodos Estudo transversal com pacientes com parkinsonismo atendidos na rede pública de saúde brasileira. Foram incluídos 130 pacientes, que foram contatados por telefone; os que responderam foram submetidos a uma entrevista estruturada para coleta de dados. Os resultados primários foram a viabilidade para teleconsultas e videoconsultas, mas também foi realizada uma regressão logística entre a viabilidade de uma videoconsulta e fatores associados.

Resultados A participação em telemedicina era possível ou consentida por 69 (53,08%) dos pacientes com relação a teleconsultas, e por 50 (38,5%) com relação a videoconsultas. As teleconsultas e videoconsultas eram viáveis para 80,2% e 58,1% dos pacientes acessíveis por telefone, respectivamente. Uma maior renda familiar foi positivamente correlacionada com a viabilidade de uma videoconsulta, enquanto uma associação negativa foi observada com relação a ser casado ou estar em união estável e ter baixo grau de escolaridade.

Conclusões Uma proporção significativa de pacientes com parkinsonismo em um país em desenvolvimento é inacessível, não quer, ou não pode participar da telemedicina. Entre os pacientes contatáveis, a viabilidade é maior, mas ainda menor do que a relatada em estudos em países desenvolvidos. Renda familiar, escolaridade e estado civil foram associados à viabilidade das videoconsultas.

Keywords

Parkinsonian Disorders - Parkinson Disease - Telemedicine - Remote Consultation

Palavras-chave

Transtornos Parkinsonianos - Doença de Parkinson - Telemedicina - Consulta Remota

Authors' Contributions

DTS: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing of the original draft, and review and editing of the article; DMFC, MZS: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, and review and editing of the article; MTSS, PF, LWM: data curation, investigation, and review and editing of the article; AFSS: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing of the original draft, and review and editing of the article.




Publication History

Received: 11 October 2021

Accepted: 13 December 2021

Article published online:
04 October 2022

© 2022. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • References

  • 1 GBD 2016 Parkinson's Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson's disease, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17 (11) 939-953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 McFarland NR. Diagnostic Approach to Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2016; 22 (4 Movement Disorders): 1117-1142 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000000348.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schneider RB, Biglan KM. The promise of telemedicine for chronic neurological disorders: the example of Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16 (07) 541-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Papa SM, Brundin P, Fung VSC. et al; MDS-Scientific Issues Committee. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. Mov Disord 2020; 35 (05) 711-715 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28067.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bloem BR, Dorsey ER, Okun MS. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 Crisis as Catalyst for Telemedicine for Chronic Neurological Disorders. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77 (08) 927-928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hassan A, Mari Z, Gatto EM. et al; International Telemedicine Study Group. Global Survey on Telemedicine Utilization for Movement Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mov Disord 2020; 35 (10) 1701-1711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Larson DN, Schneider RB, Simuni T. A New Era: The Growth of Video-Based Visits for Remote Management of Persons with Parkinson's Disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2021; 11 (s1): S27-S34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dorsey ER, Deuel LM, Voss TS. et al. Increasing access to specialty care: a pilot, randomized controlled trial of telemedicine for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2010; 25 (11) 1652-1659 DOI: 10.1002/mds.23145.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Venkataraman V, Donohue SJ, Biglan KM, Wicks P, Dorsey ER. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: A case series. Neurol Clin Pract 2014; 4 (02) 146-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wilkinson JR, Spindler M, Wood SM. et al. High patient satisfaction with telehealth in Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled study. Neurol Clin Pract 2016; 6 (03) 241-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Beck CA, Beran DB, Biglan KM. et al; Connect.Parkinson Investigators. National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease. Neurology 2017; 89 (11) 1152-1161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dorsey ER, Wagner JD, Bull MT. et al. Feasibility of Virtual Research Visits in Fox Trial Finder. J Parkinsons Dis 2015; 5 (03) 505-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85 (11) 867-872 DOI: 10.2471/blt.07.045120.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M. et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2015; 30 (12) 1591-1601 DOI: 10.1002/mds.26424.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bjornestad A, Tysnes O-B, Larsen JP, Alves G. Reliability of Three Disability Scales for Detection of Independence Loss in Parkinson's Disease. Parkinsons Dis 2016; 2016: 1941034
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shalash A, Fathy M, Dawood NL, Hamid E. Adopting Virtual Visits for Parkinson's Disease Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Developing Country. Front Neurol 2020; 11: 582613 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.582613.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Luciano E, Mahmood MA, Mansouri Rad P. Telemedicine adoption issues in the United States and Brazil: Perception of healthcare professionals. Health Informatics J 2020; 26 (04) 2344-2361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Governo Federal. Brasil registrou mais de 234 milhões de acessos móveis em 2020. https://www.gov.br/pt-br/noticias/transito-e-transportes/2021/05/brasil-registrou-mais-de-234-milhoes-de-acessos-moveis-em-2020 . Published May, 03 2021.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Darrat I, Tam S, Boulis M, Williams AM. Socioeconomic Disparities in Patient Use of Telehealth During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Surge. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147 (03) 287-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shalash A, Spindler M, Cubo E. Global Perspective on Telemedicine for Parkinson's Disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2021; 11 (s1): S11-S18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar