Z Gastroenterol 2022; 60(08): e428-e429
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1754607
Abstracts | DGVS/DGAV
Darm & Infektiologie
CED: Medikamentäse Therapie
Freitag, 16. September 2022, 08:00 – 09:28, Saal 5

Long-Term Cardiac Safety of Ozanimod in Phase 3 Clinical Program of Ulcerative Colitis and Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

A Sturm
1   DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Berlin, Deutschland
,
A Armuzzi
2   Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italien
,
RK Cross
3   University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Vereinigte Staaten
,
GR Lichtenstein
4   University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Vereinigte Staaten
,
HA Ahmad
5   Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, Vereinigte Staaten
,
L Charles
5   Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, Vereinigte Staaten
,
A Elegbe
5   Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, Vereinigte Staaten
,
A Petersen
5   Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, Vereinigte Staaten
,
JK Sheffield
5   Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, Vereinigte Staaten
,
J Hou
6   Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Vereinigte Staaten
,
M Regueiro
7   Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Vereinigte Staaten
,
DC Wolf
8   Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates, Atlanta, Vereinigte Staaten
,
M Long
9   UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, Vereinigte Staaten
› Author Affiliations
 

Introduction Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators may be associated with bradycardia and atrioventricular conduction delays. In a previous analysis, first-dose ozanimod had minimal effects on cardiac function.

Objectives This analysis evaluated long-term cardiac safety following continuous ozanimod 0.92 mg (equivalent to ozanimod HCl 1 mg) in the phase 3 ulcerative colitis (UC) True North (TN) trial and multiple sclerosis (MS) 12-mo SUNBEAM and 24-mo RADIANCE trials.

Methods In TN, patients (pts) received double-blind ozanimod or placebo (Cohort 1) or open-label ozanimod (Cohort 2) in the induction period; pts with clinical response to ozanimod at 10 wks were rerandomised to double-blind ozanimod or placebo maintenance treatment. ECGs were monitored at screening, Day 1, Wk-10, and Wk-52; heart rate (HR) was monitored at every visit. In the MS trials, ECGs were monitored at screening, baseline, Day 15, and end of treatment (EOT); HR was monitored similarly at the beginning, then every 3 mo until EOT. Cardiac-related treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported.

Results In TN, continuous ozanimod was not associated with clinically significant changes in HR or ECG. The incidence of cardiac-related TEAEs with ozanimod during induction was low (1.4% in Cohort 1 and 2.2% in Cohort 2); in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, respectively, bradycardia (0.5% and 0.8%), palpitations (0.5% and 0.3%), and tachycardia (0.5% and 0.3%) were the most common cardiac-related TEAEs associated with ozanimod. In maintenance, cardiac-related TEAEs were reported in 1.3% of pts on continuous ozanimod. Cardiac-related serious AEs (SAEs) were uncommon (angina pectoris, coronary artery stenosis, pericarditis in 1 patient each). In the pooled MSstudies, no clinically significant HR or ECG changes were associated with chronic treatment up to Mo 24. The incidence of cardiac-related TEAEs was low with ozanimod (3.4%). Two patients experienced cardiac-related SAEs resulting in hospitalization with ozanimod (asymptomatic sinus bradycardia and symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia). Discontinuations due to cardiac-related TEAEs with ozanimod were low in TN (1 angina pectoris case and 2 bradycardia cases during induction in Cohort 2) and the MS trials (1 supraventricular tachycardia case in SUNBEAM).

Conclusion Ozanimod had a manageable long-term cardiac safety profile with a low incidence of bradycardia and few serious long-term cardiac safety findings in the phase 3 UC and MS trials.



Publication History

Article published online:
19 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany