Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2022; 26(04): 469-477
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1754342
Review Article

Imaging of Structural Abnormalities of the Sacrum: The Old Faithful and Newly Emerging Techniques

Elke Vereecke
1   Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
,
Nele Herregods
1   Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
,
Lieve Morbée
1   Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
,
Frederiek Laloo
1   Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
,
Min Chen
2   Department of Radiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
,
Lennart Jans
1   Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The sacrum and sacroiliac joints pose a long-standing challenge for adequate imaging because of their complex anatomical form, oblique orientation, and posterior location in the pelvis, making them subject to superimposition. The sacrum and sacroiliac joints are composed of multiple diverse tissues, further complicating their imaging. Varying imaging techniques are suited to evaluate the sacrum, each with its specific clinical indications, benefits, and drawbacks. New techniques continue to be developed and validated, such as dual-energy computed tomography (CT) and new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, for example susceptibility-weighted imaging. Ongoing development of artificial intelligence, such as algorithms allowing reconstruction of MRI-based synthetic CT images, promises even more clinical imaging options.

Keywords

sacrum - sacroiliac joints - magnetic resonance imaging - dual-energy computed tomography - artificial intelligence


Publication History

Article published online:
14 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Beckmann NM, Chinapuvvula NR. Sacral fractures: classification and management. Emerg Radiol 2017; 24 (06) 605-617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Teran-Garza R, Verdines-Perez AM, Tamez-Garza C. et al. Anatomical variations of the sacro-iliac joint: a computed tomography study. Surg Radiol Anat 2021; 43 (06) 819-825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Prassopoulos PK, Faflia CP, Voloudaki AE, Gourtsoyiannis NC. Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variants on CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23 (02) 323-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 El Rafei M, Badr S, Lefebvre G. et al. Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variations on MR images. Eur Radiol 2018; 28 (12) 5328-5337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tok Umay S, Korkmaz M. Frequency of anatomical variation of the sacroiliac joint in asymptomatic young adults and its relationship with sacroiliac joint degeneration. Clin Anat 2020; 33 (06) 839-843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Demir M, Mavi A, Gümüsburun E, Bayram M, Gürsoy S, Nishio H. Anatomical variations with joint space measurements on CT. Kobe J Med Sci 2007; 53 (05) 209-217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Konin GP, Walz DM. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (10) 1778-1786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hanhivaara J, Määttä JH, Niinimäki J, Nevalainen MT. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae are associated with lumbar degeneration: retrospective evaluation of 3855 consecutive abdominal CT scans. Eur Radiol 2020; 30 (06) 3409-3416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine 1984; 9 (05) 493-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Carrino JA, Campbell Jr PD, Lin DC. et al. Effect of spinal segment variants on numbering vertebral levels at lumbar MR imaging. Radiology 2011; 259 (01) 196-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Apaydin M, Uluc ME, Sezgin G. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in the young men population with low back pain: anatomical considerations and degenerations (transitional vertebra types in the young men population with low back pain). Radiol Med (Torino) 2019; 124 (05) 375-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shah M, Halalmeh DR, Sandio A, Tubbs RS, Moisi MD. Anatomical variations that can lead to spine surgery at the wrong level: part III lumbosacral spine. Cureus 2020; 12 (07) e9433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X. et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68 (Suppl. 02) ii1-ii44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tuite MJ. Sacroiliac joint imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2008; 12 (01) 72-82
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ryan LM, Carrera GF, Lightfoot Jr RW, Hoffman RG, Kozin F. The radiographic diagnosis of sacroiliitis. A comparison of different views with computed tomograms of the sacroiliac joint. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26 (06) 760-763
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Battistone MJ, Manaster BJ, Reda DJ, Clegg DO. Radiographic diagnosis of sacroiliitis–are sacroiliac views really better?. J Rheumatol 1998; 25 (12) 2395-2401
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bellabarba C, Stewart JD, Ricci WM, DiPasquale TG, Bolhofner BR. Midline sagittal sacral fractures in anterior-posterior compression pelvic ring injuries. J Orthop Trauma 2003; 17 (01) 32-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schicho A, Schmidt SA, Seeber K, Olivier A, Richter PH, Gebhard F. Pelvic X-ray misses out on detecting sacral fractures in the elderly—importance of CT imaging in blunt pelvic trauma. Injury 2016; 47 (03) 707-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lowe LH, Johanek AJ, Moore CW. Sonography of the neonatal spine: part 1, Normal anatomy, imaging pitfalls, and variations that may simulate disorders. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (03) 733-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Meyers AB, Chandra T, Epelman M. Sonographic spinal imaging of normal anatomy, pathology and magnetic growing rods in children. Pediatr Radiol 2017; 47 (09) 1046-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Yoon HM, Byeon S-J, Hwang J-Y. et al. Sacrococcygeal teratomas in newborns: a comprehensive review for the radiologists. Acta Radiol 2018; 59 (02) 236-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gerber S, Ollivier L, Leclère J. et al. Imaging of sacral tumours. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37 (04) 277-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lyders EM, Whitlow CT, Baker MD, Morris PP. Imaging and treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (02) 201-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (22) 2277-2284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Simonetti I, Verde F, Palumbo L. et al. Dual energy computed tomography evaluation of skeletal traumas. Eur J Radiol 2021; 134: 109456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wortman JR, Uyeda JW, Fulwadhva UP, Sodickson AD. Dual-energy CT for abdominal and pelvic trauma. Radiographics 2018; 38 (02) 586-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Palm H-G, Lang P, Hackenbroch C, Sailer L, Friemert B. Dual-energy CT as an innovative method for diagnosing fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: a retrospective comparison with MRI as the gold standard. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140 (04) 473-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Booz C, Nöske J, Albrecht MH. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of color-coded virtual noncalcium dual-energy CT for the assessment of bone marrow edema in sacral insufficiency fracture in comparison to MRI. Eur J Radiol 2020; 129: 109046
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Chen M, Herregods N, Jaremko JL. et al. Bone marrow edema in sacroiliitis: detection with dual-energy CT. Eur Radiol 2020; 30 (06) 3393-3400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yu L, Christner JA, Leng S, Wang J, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality. Med Phys 2011; 38 (12) 6371-6379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Love C, Din AS, Tomas MB, Kalapparambath TP, Palestro CJ. Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics 2003; 23 (02) 341-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Scheyerer MJ, Hüllner M, Pietsch C, Werner CML, Veit-Haibach P. Evaluation of pelvic ring injuries using SPECT/CT. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44 (02) 217-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Slobodin G, Rimar D, Boulman N. et al. Acute sacroiliitis. Clin Rheumatol 2016; 35 (04) 851-856
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Stürzenbecher A, Braun J, Paris S, Biedermann T, Hamm B, Bollow M. MR imaging of septic sacroiliitis. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 29 (08) 439-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wu MS, Chang SS, Lee SH, Lee CC. Pyogenic sacroiliitis—a comparison between paediatric and adult patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46 (11) 1684-1687
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Henes FO, Nüchtern JV, Groth M. et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography in the detection of pelvic fractures. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81 (09) 2337-2342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Nüchtern JV, Hartel MJ, Henes FO. et al. Significance of clinical examination, CT and MRI scan in the diagnosis of posterior pelvic ring fractures. Injury 2015; 46 (02) 315-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Jans L, Egund N, Eshed I, Sudoł-Szopińska I, Jurik AG. Sacroiliitis in axial spondyloarthritis: assessing morphology and activity. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2018; 22 (02) 180-188
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Laloo F, Herregods N, Varkas G. et al. MR signal in the sacroiliac joint space in spondyloarthritis: a new sign. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (05) 2024-2030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Safaee MM, Carrera DA, Chin CT. et al. Diagnostic challenges in primary sacral tumors and the yield of computed tomography-guided needle biopsy in the modern era. World Neurosurg 2020; 138: e806-e818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Pillai S, Govender S. Sacral chordoma: a review of literature. J Orthop 2018; 15 (02) 679-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Raya JG, Dietrich O, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A. Methods and applications of diffusion imaging of vertebral bone marrow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24 (06) 1207-1220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Baur A, Stäbler A, Brüning R. et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 1998; 207 (02) 349-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Jones BC, Fayad LM. Musculoskeletal tumor imaging: focus on emerging techniques. Semin Roentgenol 2017; 52 (04) 269-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Ahlawat S, Khandheria P, Subhawong TK, Fayad LM. Differentiation of benign and malignant skeletal lesions with quantitative diffusion weighted MRI at 3T. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84 (06) 1091-1097
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Rao A, Sharma C, Parampalli R. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating benign from malignant bone tumors. BJR Open 2019; 1 (01) 20180048
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Del Grande F, Ahlawat S, Subhawong T, Fayad LM. Characterization of indeterminate soft tissue masses referred for biopsy: what is the added value of contrast imaging at 3.0 tesla?. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 45 (02) 390-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Gezmis E, Donmez FY, Agildere M. Diagnosis of early sacroiliitis in seronegative spondyloarthropathies by DWI and correlation of clinical and laboratory findings with ADC values. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 (12) 2316-2321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Beltran LS, Samim M, Gyftopoulos S, Bruno MT, Petchprapa CN. Does the addition of DWI to fluid-sensitive conventional MRI of the sacroiliac joints improve the diagnosis of sacroiliitis?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210 (06) 1309-1316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Cheng YCN. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30 (01) 19-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Martín-Noguerol T, Montesinos P, Casado-Verdugo OL, Beltrán LS, Luna A. Susceptibility weighted imaging for evaluation of musculoskeletal lesions. Eur J Radiol 2021; 138: 109611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Deppe D, Hermann K-G, Proft F. et al. CT-like images of the sacroiliac joint generated from MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open 2021; 7 (02) e001656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Böker SM, Adams LC, Bender YY. et al. Evaluation of vertebral body fractures using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2018; 28 (05) 2228-2235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Baraliakos X, Hoffmann F, Deng X, Wang Y-Y, Huang F, Braun J. Detection of Erosions in Sacroiliac joints of patients with axial spondyloarthritis using the magnetic resonance imaging volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. J Rheumatol 2019; 46 (11) 1445-1449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Diekhoff T, Greese J, Sieper J, Poddubnyy D, Hamm B, Hermann KA. Improved detection of erosions in the sacroiliac joints on MRI with volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE): results from the SIMACT study. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77 (11) 1585-1589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Chea P, Mandell JC. Current applications and future directions of deep learning in musculoskeletal radiology. Skeletal Radiol 2020; 49 (02) 183-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Kitamura G. Deep learning evaluation of pelvic radiographs for position, hardware presence, and fracture detection. Eur J Radiol 2020; 130: 109139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Shenkman Y, Qutteineh B, Joskowicz L. et al. Automatic detection and diagnosis of sacroiliitis in CT scans as incidental findings. Med Image Anal 2019; 57: 165-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Janz LBO, Chen M, Elewaut D. et al. MRI-based synthetic CT in the detection of structural lesions in patients with suspected sacroiliitis: comparison with MRI. Radiology 2021; 298 (02) 343-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar