Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751305
Health Information Technology Use among Chronic Disease Patients: An Analysis of the United States Health Information National Trends Survey
Funding The authors would like to acknowledge support from Fairview Health Services and the Center for Learning Health System Sciences at the University of Minnesota. Research reported in this publication was also supported by National Institutes of Health grant no.: P30CA077598, utilizing the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core shared resource of the Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota and by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health Award no.: UL1-TR002494. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00035026/202203/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0042-1751305_210328ra-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background Chronic disease is the leading cause of mortality in the United States. Health information technology (HIT) tools show promise for improving disease management.
Objectives This study aims to understand the following: (1) how self-perceptions of health compare between those with and without disease; (2) how HIT usage varies between chronic disease profiles (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, depression, cancer, and comorbidities); (3) how HIT trends have changed in the past 6 years; and (4) the likelihood that a given chronic disease patient uses specific HIT tools.
Methods The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) inclusive of 2014 to 2020 served as the primary data source with statistical analysis completed using Stata. Bivariate analyses and two-tailed t-tests were conducted to compare self-perceived health and HIT usage to chronic disease. Logistic regression models were created to examine the odds of a specific patient using various forms of HIT, controlling for demographics and comorbidities.
Results Logistic regression models controlling for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities showed that pulmonary disease, depression, and cancer patients had an increased likelihood of using HIT tools, for example, depression patients had an 81.1% increased likelihood of looking up health information (p < 0.0001). In contrast, diabetic, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease patients appeared to use HIT tools at similar rates to patients without chronic disease. Overall HIT usage has increased during the timeframe examined.
Conclusion This study demonstrates that certain chronic disease cohorts appear to have greater HIT usage than others. Further analysis should be done to understand what factors influence patients to utilize HIT which may provide additional insights into improving design and user experience for other populations with the goal of improving management of disease. Such analyses could also establish a new baseline to account for differences in HIT usage as a direct consequence of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Keywords
mobile platforms - consumer health informatics - patients with chronic illness or special needs - other clinical informatics applications - internet and the web technology - information seekingProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
No human and/or animal subjects were included in the study. All data obtained from the HINTS survey were deidentified.
Publication History
Received: 05 January 2022
Accepted: 01 June 2022
Article published online:
11 August 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). About chronic diseases. 2021 . Accessed December 11, 2021 at: https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/index.htm
- 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Chronic diseases in America. 2021 . Accessed December 11, 2021 at: https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/infographic/chronic-diseases.htm
- 3 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Health IT: advancing America's health care. 2017 . Accessed December 11, 2021 at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/health-information-technology-fact-sheet.pdf
- 4 Forbes. How virtual reality can help the global mental health crisis. 2021 . Accessed March 6, 2021 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/solrogers/2019/05/15/how-virtual-reality-can-help-the-global-mental-health-crisis/#321c60ef28f7
- 5 Kruse CS, Argueta DA, Lopez L, Nair A. Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e40
- 6 Thakkar J, Kurup R, Laba TL. et al. Mobile telephone text messaging for medication adherence in chronic disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176 (03) 340-349
- 7 Triantafyllidis A, Kondylakis H, Votis K, Tzovaras D, Maglaveras N, Rahimi K. Features, outcomes, and challenges in mobile health interventions for patients living with chronic diseases: A review of systematic reviews. Int J Med Inform 2019; 132: 103984
- 8 Rajamani G, Kurina L, Rosas LG. Investigating Health Information Technology Usage by Sociodemographic Subpopulations to Increase Community Engagement in Healthcare: An Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. November 2021
- 9 Ojinnaka CO, Adepoju OE. Racial and ethnic disparities in health information technology use and associated trends among individuals living with chronic diseases. Popul Health Manag 2021; 24 (06) 675-680
- 10 National Cancer Institute (NCI). Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). 2019 . Accessed September 5, 2021 from https://hints.cancer.gov/
- 11 National Cancer Institute (NCI). HINTS 5, Cycle 4. 2020 Survey Materials. 2020. Accessed July 14, 2021 from: https://hints.cancer.gov/data/survey-instruments.aspx#H5C4
- 12 National Cancer Institute (NCI). HINTS 5 Web Pilot Results Report. 2019 . Accessed September 5, 2021 from https://hints.cancer.gov/docs/methodologyreports/HINTS_WebPilotResultsReport.pdf
- 13 Bernell S, Howard SW. Use your words carefully: what is a chronic disease?. Front Public Health 2016; 4: 159
- 14 National Cancer Institute (NCI). Health Information National Trends Survey annotated form. 2020 . Accessed September 5, 2021 from: https://hints.cancer.gov/docs/Instruments/HINTS5_Cycle4_AnnotatedInstrumentEnglish.pdf
- 15 Liu SY, Wrosch C, Morin AJS, Quesnel-Vallée A, Pruessner JC. Changes in self-esteem and chronic disease across adulthood: a 16-year longitudinal analysis. Soc Sci Med 2019; 242: 112600
- 16 Adrian-Arrietta L, Casas-Fernandez de Tejerina JM. Self-perception of disease in patients with chronic diseases [in Spanish]. Semergen 2018; 44 (06) 335-680
- 17 Health Quality Ontario. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for major depression and anxiety disorders: a health technology assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2019; 19 (06) 1-199
- 18 Andrews G, Basu A, Cuijpers P. et al. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depression disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: An updated meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord 2018; 55: 70-78
- 19 Mukhopadhyay S, Basak R, Khairat S, Carney TJ. Revisiting provider role in patient use of online medical records. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (05) 1110-1119
- 20 TEVA. Healthcare technology: a need for accessibility. 2020 . Accessed December 11, 2021 from: https://respiratorycarev2.com/healthcare-technology-a-need-for-accessibility/