Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2022; 63(02): e77-e82
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750094
Artículo Original | Original Article

Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis for Rotator Cuff Tears: Does Acromial Morphology Affect the Results?

Article in several languages: español | English
Patricio Meleán 
1   Departamento de Traumatología y Ortopedia, Equipo de Hombro, Clínica MEDS, Santiago, Chile
2   Departamento de Traumatología y Ortopedia, Coordinador Transversal Cirugía de Hombro y Codo, Red Salud, Chile
,
Walter Rojas 
1   Departamento de Traumatología y Ortopedia, Equipo de Hombro, Clínica MEDS, Santiago, Chile
,
Mauricio Agloni 
3   Unidad de Traumatología, Equipo de Hombro y Codo, Hospital la Florida, Santiago, Chile
,
Guillermo Droppelmann 
4   Unidad Académica, Clínica MEDS, Santiago, Chile
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Currently, there are no studies that evaluate the agreement between ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in rotator cuff (RC) tears by the observation of parameters such as the acromial index (AI) and critical shoulder angle (CSA). We hypothesize that the greater coverage of the footprint by increased AI or CSA could affect the proper visualization of the RC in US scans by its interposition between the tendinous complex and the US transducer.

Objective To estimate the agreement between US and MRI in the diagnosis of patients with RC tears confirmed by arthroscopy and with AI and CSA greater than the normal average values (0.7 and 35° respectively). The secondary objective is to determine if the diagnostic agreement is comparable regarding different types of tear (partial and complete).

Materials and Methods A retrospective study of a consecutive case series of 100 patients with partial or complete RC tears confirmed by arthroscopy.

Results The mean age of the study group was of 55.7 ± 10.5 years. The mean AI was of 0.77 ± 0.08, and the mean CSA was of 37.42° ± 5.88°. The agreement regarding the US, the MRI and the AI was > 0.7 of 56.7% (K = 0.27; p = 0.01); and < 0.7 of 35.7% (K = 0.01; p = 0.46) respectively. And the agreement regarding the US, the MRI and the CSA was > 35° of 61.5% (K = 0.32; p = 0.001); and < 35° of 33.3% (K = -0.00; p = 0.52) respectively.

Conclusion The diagnostic agreement of the US compared with the MRI, in patients with RC tears confirmed by arthroscopy and with AI and CSA greater than the normal average values was fair. The diagnostic agreement of the US compared with the MRI, in patients with AI and CSA lower than the normal average values was poor. The diagnostic performance of the IS and MRI was similar for partial and complete tears.

Keywords

rotator cuff - ultrasound - magnetic resonance imaging - acromial index - critical shoulder angle


Publication History

Received: 26 January 2021

Accepted: 26 April 2022

Article published online:
03 October 2022

© 2022. Sociedad Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referencias

  • 1 Pfalzer F, Endele D, Huth J, Bauer G, Mauch F. Clinical and MRI results after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the double-row technique. A consecutive study. [Klinische und magnetresonanztomographische Ergebnisse nach arthroskopischer Rotatorenmanschettenrekonstruktion in “Double-row”-Technik. Eine serielle Studie] Obere Extremität 2011; 6 (04) 267-274 DOI: 10.1007/s11678-011-0117-1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Papadopoulos P, Karataglis D, Boutsiadis A, Fotiadou A, Christoforidis J, Christodoulou A. Functional outcome and structural integrity following mini-open repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears: a 3-5 year follow-up study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (01) 131-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hanusch BC, Goodchild L, Finn P, Rangan A. Large and massive tears of the rotator cuff: functional outcome and integrity of the repair after a mini-open procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (02) 201-205 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21286.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cummins CA, Murrell GAC. Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003; 12 (02) 128-133 DOI: 10.1067/mse.2003.21.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jacobson JA, Lancaster S, Prasad A, van Holsbeeck MT, Craig JG, Kolowich P. Full-Thickness and Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tendon Tears: Value of US Signs in Diagnosis. Radiology 2004; 230 (01) 234-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fang Zheng et al. Role of Ultrasound in the Detection of Rotator-Cuff Syndrome: An Observational Study. Med Sci Monit 2019; 25: 5856-5863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Okoroha KR, Mehran N, Duncan J, Washington T, Spiering T, Bey MJ, Moutzouros V. Characterization of Rotator Cuff Tears: Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Orthopedics 2016; 40 (01) e124-e130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gilat R, Atoun E, Cohen O. et al. Recurrent rotator cuff tear: is ultrasound imaging reliable?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (07) 1263-1267 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.017.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y, Johnston RV, Hanchard NC, Faloppa F. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 9 (09) CD009020 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009020.pub2.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kluger R, Bock P, Mittlböck M, Krampla W, Engel A. Long-term survivorship of rotator cuff repairs using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (10) 2071-2081 DOI: 10.1177/0363546511406395.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Harrison AK, Flatow EL. Subacromial impingement syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (11) 701-708 DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201111000-00006.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Papadonikolakis A, McKenna M, Warme W, Martin BI, Matsen III FA. Published evidence relevant to the diagnosis of impingement syndrome of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (19) 1827-1832 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.j.01748.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Sukthankar A, Schmid MR, Gerber C. Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (04) 800-805 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.03042.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; Mar; 33 (01) 159-174
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Miller BS, Downie BK, Kohen RB. et al. When do rotator cuff repairs fail? Serial ultrasound examination after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (10) 2064-2070 DOI: 10.1177/0363546511413372.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained?. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (10) 2108-2116 DOI: 10.1177/0363546510397171.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Denard PJ, Burkhart SS. Techniques for managing poor quality tissue and bone during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (10) 1409-1421 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.05.015.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Laron D, Samagh SP, Liu X, Kim HT, Feeley BT. Muscle degeneration in rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (02) 164-174 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.09.027.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kang JR, Gupta R. Mechanisms of fatty degeneration in massive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (02) 175-180 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.017.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kolbe AB, Collins MS, Sperling JW. Severe atrophy and fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus muscle due to isolated infraspinatus tendon tear. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41 (01) 107-110 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1265-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Garofalo R, Karlsson J, Nordenson U, Cesari E, Conti M, Castagna A. Anterior-superior internal impingement of the shoulder: an evidence-based review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (12) 1688-1693 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1232-z.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Neer II CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972; 54 (01) 41-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med 1991; 10 (04) 823-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Zumstein MA, Jost B, Hempel J, Hodler J, Gerber C. The clinical and structural long-term results of open repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (11) 2423-2431 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00677.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kitay GS, Iannotti JP, Williams GR, Haygood T, Kneeland BJ, Berlin J. Roentgenographic assessment of acromial morphologic condition in rotator cuff impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995; 4 (06) 441-448 DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(05)80036-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hamid N, Omid R, Yamaguchi K, Steger-May K, Stobbs G, Keener JD. Relationship of radiographic acromial characteristics and rotator cuff disease: a prospective investigation of clinical, radiographic, and sonographic findings. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (10) 1289-1298 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.09.028.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Moor BK, Bouaicha S, Rothenfluh DA, Sukthankar A, Gerber C. Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint?: A radiological study of the critical shoulder angle. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (07) 935-941 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31028.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA, Yamaguchi K. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (04) 708-716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar