CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2023; 17(03): 673-677
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749157
Original Article

Agreement of the Newly Developed Moyers' Equations and Moyers' Tables

Sasipa Thiradilok
1   Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Thailand
,
Praeopailin Witayabusarakhum
2   Private Dentist, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Somchai Manopatanakul
1   Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Thailand
,
Christopher Ho
3   Children's Oral Health Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to develop the Moyers' prediction equation to be used with tooth widths predicting app on smartphone.

Materials and Methods Four equations were developed separately for sex and dental arches. Internal validation with Moyers' table was finished. External validation on 37 subjects with agreement test of both Moyers' prediction equations and Moyers' prediction tables was performed.

Statistical Analysis A general linear model procedure was used to create four prediction equations. Internal validation was evaluated using the coefficient of determination. External validation was performed using Bland and Altman (BA) test.

Results Four equations were developed for OrthoAnalysis app on smartphone. The overall coefficient of determination of all equations and prediction table was 0.998 (p < 0.05) indicating good agreement of the two methods. The agreement test on the 37 subjects was that the BA test revealed the BA limits of agreement between the residuals of two predictions was −0.001 mm and ranged from -0.143 to 0.140 mm with almost all plots lying inside this difference interval.

Conclusions In summary, four novel estimation equations were developed and showed very low difference to the well accepted original Moyers' prediction tables. Therefore, the equations used in the orthodontic app for predicting unerupted tooth width were verified and valid for clinical use.



Publication History

Article published online:
28 October 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Moyers R. Handbook of Orthodontics. 4th edition. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988: 577
  • 2 Hakim MAA, Khatab NMA, Mohamed KMG, Elheeny AAH. A comparative three-dimensional finite element study of two space regainers in the mixed dentition stage. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (01) 107-114
  • 3 Panchal V, Gurunathan D, Shanmugaavel AK. Smartphone application as an aid in determination of caries risk and prevention: a pilot study. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (04) 469-474
  • 4 Gupta G, Vaid N. The World of Orthodontic apps. APOS Trends Orthod 2017; 7: 73-79
  • 5 Sharif MO, Siddiqui NR, Hodges SJ. Patient awareness of orthodontic mobile phone apps. J Orthod 2019; 46 (01) 51-55
  • 6 Mamillapalli PK, Sesham VM, Neela PK, Mandaloju SP, Keesara S. A smartphone app for cephalometric analysis. J Clin Orthod 2016; 50 (11) 694-633
  • 7 Sayar G, Kilinc DD. Manual tracing versus smartphone application (app) tracing: a comparative study. Acta Odontol Scand 2017; 75 (08) 588-594
  • 8 Ahmed I, Ahmad NS, Ali S. et al. Medication adherence apps: review and content analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6 (03) e62
  • 9 Witayabusarakhum P, Manopatanakul S, Ho C. A comprehensive orthodontic model analysis app. J Clin Orthod 2015; 49 (06) 388-390
  • 10 Manopatanakul S, Watanawirun N. Comprehensive intermaxillary tooth width proportion of Bangkok residents. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25 (02) 122-127
  • 11 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476): 307-310
  • 12 Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22 (01) 85-93
  • 13 BlandAltmanLeh. Plots (Slightly Extended) Bland-Altman Plots. R package version 0.3.1. Lehnert B,. 2015 https://cran.r-project.org/package=BlandAltmanLeh Accessed April 10, 2022
  • 14 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. / R Core Team (R Foundation for Statistical Computing),. 2013 http://www.r-project.org/ Accessed April 10, 2022
  • 15 Pancherz H, Schäffer C. Individual-based prediction of the size of the supporting zones in the permanent dentition. A comparison of the Moyers method with a unitary prediction value. J Orofac Orthop 1999; 60 (04) 227-235
  • 16 Chart trendline formula is inaccurate in Excel. /Microsoft,. 2017 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/211967 . Accessed April 10, 2022
  • 17 Buwembo W, Luboga S. Moyer's method of mixed dentition analysis: a meta-analysis. Afr Health Sci 2004; 4 (01) 63-66
  • 18 Sherpa J, Sah G, Rong Z, Wu L. Applicability of the Tanaka-Johnston and Moyers mixed dentition analyses in Northeast Han Chinese. J Orthod 2015; 42 (02) 95-102
  • 19 Rojo JFG, Sandoval DD, Minjarez AM, García ARR. Gender-adjustment of Moyers dentition analysis for the Nayarit (Mexico) population. Rev Odontol Mex 2015; 19: e224-e227
  • 20 Suryawanshi G, Mahindra K, Mohode R, Pathak AU, Bafna H. Applicability of Moyer's mixed dentition analysis in Maharashtrian children of India. IP Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res 2017; 3: 163-167
  • 21 de Sousa Galdino A, Ramos TB, Filgueiras VM, Lacerda RHW. Applicability of Moyer's prediction tables to estimate the mesio-distal diameter of canines and premolars. Dent 3000. 2019; 7: 27-32