Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(06): 771-777
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749138
Original Article

Impact of a Potential 20-Week Abortion Ban on Likelihood of Completing Required Views in Second-Trimester Fetal Anatomy Ultrasound

Andrea Henkel  ‡   *
1   Division of Family Planning Services and Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
,
Isabel Beshar‡   *
1   Division of Family Planning Services and Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
,
Erica P. Cahill
1   Division of Family Planning Services and Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
,
Yair J. Blumenfeld
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
,
Jane Chueh
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
,
Kate A. Shaw
1   Division of Family Planning Services and Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations Funding This research was supported through the Stanford School of Medicine MedScholars Fund.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to quantify the likelihood of assessing all mandated fetal views during the second-trimester anatomy ultrasound prior to the proposed federal 20-week abortion ban.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study of a random sample of 1,983 patients undergoing anatomy ultrasound in 2017 at a tertiary referral center. The difference in proportion of incomplete anatomic surveys prior compared with after 20-week gestation was analyzed using X 2 and adjusted logistic regression; difference in mean days elapsed from anomaly diagnosis to termination tested using t-tests and survival analysis.

Results Incomplete views were more likely with initial ultrasound before 20 weeks (adjusted relative risk: 1.70; 95% confidence interval: 1.50–1.94); 43.5% versus 26.1% were incomplete before and after 20 weeks, respectively. Fetal structural anomalies were identified in 6.4% (n = 127/1,983) scans, with 38.0% (n = 49) identified at follow-up after initial scan was incomplete. 22.8% (n = 29) with an anomaly terminated.

Conclusion A complete assessment of fetal views during an anatomy ultrasound prior to 20-week gestation is often not technically feasible. Legislation limiting abortion to this gestational age would greatly impact patient's ability to make informed choices about their pregnancies.

Key Points

  • It is often not technically possible to complete anatomy ultrasound prior to 20-week gestation.

  • Often, anomalies are missed during early, incomplete anatomy ultrasounds.

  • After the diagnosis of a structural anomaly, one in five chose to terminate the pregnancy.

Keywords

termination - health policy - ultrasound - fetal anomaly - abortion - antenatal care

Note

Presented at the National Abortion Federation (NAF) Annual Conference in Chicago, Illinois (May 2019) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Annual Clinical Meeting in Nashville, Tennessee (May 2019).


* These authors contributed equally to this work.




Publication History

Received: 14 October 2020

Accepted: 18 February 2022

Article published online:
16 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 175: Ultrasound in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (06) e241-e256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Silvestri MT, Pettker CM, Raney JH, Xu X, Ross JS. Frequency and importance of incomplete screening fetal anatomic sonography in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35 (12) 2665-2673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Byrne JJ, Morgan JL, Twickler DM, McIntire DD, Dashe JS. Utility of follow-up standard sonography for fetal anomaly detection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222 (06) 615 e1- e9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Shaffer BL, Caughey AB, Norton ME. Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidy. Prenat Diagn 2006; 26 (08) 667-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Boyd PA, Devigan C, Khoshnood B, Loane M, Garne E, Dolk H. EUROCAT Working Group. Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome. BJOG 2008; 115 (06) 689-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Foster DG, Kimport K. Who seeks abortions at or after 20 weeks?. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2013; 45 (04) 210-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kerns JL, Swanson M, Pena S. et al. Characteristics of women who undergo second-trimester abortion in the setting of a fetal anomaly. Contraception 2012; 85 (01) 63-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Committee Opinion No. Committee Opinion No. 640: cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (03) e31-e37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Davis AR, Horvath SK, Castaño PM. Trends in gestational age at time of surgical abortion for fetal aneuploidy and structural abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (03) 278.e1-278.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dommergues M, Benachi A, Benifla JL, des Noëttes R, Dumez Y. The reasons for termination of pregnancy in the third trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106 (04) 297-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dommergues M, Mandelbrot L, Mahieu-Caputo D, Boudjema N, Durand-Zaleski I. ICI Group-Club de médecine foetale. Termination of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis in France: how severe are the foetal anomalies?. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30 (06) 531-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 S. 160 Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, (2019).
    PubMed
  • 13 State Bans on Abortion Throughout Pregnancy. 2019 Accessed March 20, 2022 at: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-later-abortions
    PubMed
  • 14 Farrell RM, Mabel H, Reider MW, Coleridge M, Yoder Katsuki M. Implications of Ohio's 20-week abortion ban on prenatal patients and the assessment of fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129 (05) 795-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hall KS, Redd S, Narasimhan S. et al. Abortion Trends in Georgia Following Enactment of the 22-Week Gestational Age Limit, 2007–2017. Am J Public Health 2020; 110 (07) e1-e5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dennis A, Manski R, Blanchard K. A qualitative exploration of low-income women's experiences accessing abortion in Massachusetts. Womens Health Issues 2015; 25 (05) 463-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gerdts C, Fuentes L, Grossman D. et al. Impact of clinic closures on women obtaining abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas. Am J Public Health 2016; 106 (05) 857-864
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dennis A, Manski R, Blanchard K. Does Medicaid coverage matter?: a qualitative multi-state study of abortion affordability for low-income women. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2014; 25 (04) 1571-1585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health. No . 19-1932 (2021).
    PubMed
  • 20 Mrazek-Pugh B, Blumenfeld YJ, Lee HC, Chueh J. Obstetric ultrasound quality improvement initiative-utilization of a quality assurance process and standardized checklists. Am J Perinatol 2015; 32 (06) 599-604
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32 (06) 1083-1101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wood SL, Owen J, Jenkins SM, Harper LM. The utility of repeat midtrimester anatomy ultrasound for anomaly detection. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (14) 1346-1351
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Moore CA, McCabe ER. Editorial utility of population-based birth defects surveillance for monitoring the health of infants and as a foundation for etiologic research. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2015; 103 (11) 895-898
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (12) 1495-1499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Schwärzler P, Senat MV, Holden D, Bernard JP, Masroor T, Ville Y. Feasibility of the second-trimester fetal ultrasound examination in an unselected population at 18, 20 or 22 weeks of pregnancy: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14 (02) 92-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Souka AP, Pilalis A, Kavalakis Y, Kosmas Y, Antsaklis P, Antsaklis A. Assessment of fetal anatomy at the 11-14-week ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24 (07) 730-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Practice Parameter for the Performance of Standard Diagnostic Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations. AIUM-ACR-ACOG-SMFM-SRU practice parameter for the performance of standard diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37 (11) E13-E24
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Barr-Walker J, Jayaweera RT, Ramirez AM, Gerdts C. Experiences of women who travel for abortion: a mixed methods systematic review. PLoS One 2019; 14 (04) e0209991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Phatak M, Ramsay J. Impact of maternal obesity on procedure of mid-trimester anomaly scan. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 30 (05) 447-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Waller DK, Shaw GM, Rasmussen SA. et al; National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Prepregnancy obesity as a risk factor for structural birth defects. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007; 161 (08) 745-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Henkel A, Lerma K, Blumenthal PD, Shaw KA. Evaluation of shorter mifepristone to misoprostol intervals for second trimester medical abortion: a retrospective cohort study. Contraception 2020; 102 (05) 327-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Johns NE, Foster DG, Upadhyay UD. Distance traveled for Medicaid-covered abortion care in California. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17 (01) 287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar