Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10(10): 557-571
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748546
Original Article

Recognition of One-, Two-, and Three-Pair Dichotic Digits under Free and Directed Recall

Anne Strouse
Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Mountain Home, Tennessee
,
Richard H. Wilson
Departments of Surgery and Communicative Disorders, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

A one-, two-, and three-pair dichotic digit test was administered to 180 subjects (20-79 years) with varying degrees of hearing sensitivity. The test was carried out under free- and directed-recall response conditions. The results indicated that recognition performance decreased as a function of increasing age. Statistical analysis using analysis of covariance indicated that differences in performance between age groups were not owing to differences in hearing sensitivity. Thus, with the effects of hearing sensitivity removed, age alone accounted for a significant portion of the variability in the data among age groups. Normative data for the free-recall condition are reported for the two lists of randomly interleaved one-, two-, and three-pair digits included on the Tonal and Speech Materials for Auditory Perceptual Assessment, Disc 2.0 (1998) compact disc. A comparison of performance in free- and directed-recall conditions indicated three patterns of results. First, 58 percent of the subjects had normal recognition performance for one-, two-, and three-pair digits under both recall conditions. Second, 39 percent of the subjects had a deficit in the free-recall condition, with normal performance in the directed-recall condition, which was interpreted as representing primarily a cognitive problem. Third, the remaining 3 percent of the subjects showed a deficit in both free- and directed-recall conditions, which was attributed primarily to an auditory problem.

Abbreviations: ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, ANOVA = analysis of variance, CD = compact disc, rau = rationalized arcsine unit

Key Words

Aging - auditory perception - compact disc - dichotic listening tests - speech perception - uncertainty


Publication History

Article published online:
09 May 2022

© 1999. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • American National Standards Institute. (1996). American National Standard Specification for Audiometers. (ANSI S3-1996). New York: ANSI.
  • Bayles K, Kaszniak A. (1987). Communication and Cognition in Normal Aging and Dementia. Boston: College Hill.
  • Bryden MP. (1988). An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. In: Hugdahl K, ed. Handbook of Dichotic Listening: Theory, Methods, and Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1–43.
  • Bryden MP, Munhall K, Allard F. (1983). Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening. Brain Lang 18:236–248.
  • Chmiel R, Jerger J. (1996). Hearing aid use, central auditory disorder, and hearing handicap in elderly persons. J Am Acad Audiol 7:190–202.
  • Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics (CHABA). (1988). Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am 83:859–893.
  • Department of Veterans Affairs. (1991). Speech Recognition and Identification Materials, Disc 1.1. Long Beach, CA: VA Medical Center.
  • Department of Veterans Affairs. (1992). Tonal and Speech Materials for Auditory Perceptual Assessment, Disc 1.0. Long Beach, CA: VA Medical Center.
  • Department of Veterans Affairs. (1998). Tonal and Speech Materials for Auditory Perceptual Assessment, Disc 2.0. Mountain Home, TN: VA Medical Center.
  • Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Morgan DE. (1984). Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 76:87–96.
  • Fifer R, Jerger J, Berlin C, Tobey E, Campbell J. (1983). Development of a dichotic sentence identification test for hearing impaired adults. Ear Hear 4:300–305.
  • Humes LE, Coughlin M, Talley L. (1996). Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 7:419–427.
  • Jerger J. (1992). Can age-related decline in speech understanding be explained by peripheral hearing loss? J Am Acad Audiol 3:33–38.
  • Jerger J, Chmiel R, Allen J, Wilson A. (1994). Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear Hear 15:274–287.
  • Jerger J, Jerger S, Oliver T, Pirozzolo F. (1989). Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear 10:79–89.
  • Jerger J, Johnson K, Jerger S, Coker N, Pirozzolo F, Gray L. (1991). Central auditory processing disorder: a case study. J Am Acad Audiol 2:36–54.
  • Jerger J, Mahurin R, Pirozzolo F. (1990a). The separability of central auditory and cognitive deficits: implications for the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1:116–119.
  • Jerger J, Oliver T, Pirozzolo F. (1990b). Impact of central auditory processing disorder and cognitive deficit on the self-assessment of hearing handicap in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1:75–80.
  • Jerger J, Stach Β, Johnson Κ, Loiselle L, Jerger S. (1990c). Patterns of below normality in dichotic listening in the elderly. In: Jensen J, eds. Presbyacusis and Other Age Related Aspects. Copenhagen: Stougaard Jensen, 143–150.
  • Johnson RC, Cole RE, Bowers JK, Foiles SV, Patrick JW, Woliver RE. (1979). Hemisphere efficiency in middle and later adulthood. Cortex 15:109–119.
  • Kimura D. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can J Psychiatry 15:156–165.
  • Lake DA, Bryden MP. (1976). Handedness and sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry. Brain Lang 3:266–282.
  • McKeever WF, Nolan DR, Diehi JA, Seitz KS. (1984). Handedness and language laterality: discrimination of handedness groups on the dichotic consonant-vowel task. Cortex 20:509–523.
  • Musiek FE. (1983). Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear 4:79–83.
  • Musiek FE, Gollegly KM, Kibbe KS, Verkest-Lenz SB. (1991). Proposed screening test for central auditory disorders: follow-up on the dichotic digits test. Am J Otol 12:109–113.
  • Ryan W, McNeil M. (1974). Listener reliability for a dichotic task. J Acoust Soc Am 56:1922–1923.
  • Speaks C, Niccum N, Carney E. (1982). Statistical properties of responses to dichotic listening with CV nonsense syllables. J Acoust Soc Am 72:1185–1194.
  • Speaks C, Niccum N, Van Tasell D. (1985). Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 28:16–25.
  • Stach BA, Spretnjak ML, Jerger J. (1990). The prevalence of central presbycusis in a clinical population. J Am Acad Audiol 1:109–115.
  • Strouse AL, Hall JWH. (1995). Test-retest reliability of a dichotic digits test for assessing central auditory function in Alzheimer’s disease. Audiology 34:85–90.
  • Strouse A, Wilson RH. (1999). Stimulus length uncertainty with dichotic digit recognition. J Am Acad Audiol 10:219-229.
  • Studebaker J. (1985). A “rationalized” arcsin transformation. J Speech Hear Res 28:455-462.
  • Wilson RH, Jaffe MS. (1996). Interactions of age, ear, and stimulus complexity on dichotic digit recognition. J Am Acad Audiol 7:358-364.
  • Wilson RH, Leigh ED. (1996). Identification performance by right- and left-handed listeners on dichotic CV material. J Am Acad Audiol 7:1–6.