Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10(05): 261-272
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748497
Original Article

Pulsed versus Continuous Tones for Evaluating the Loudness of Tinnitus

James A. Henry
National VA RR&D Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
,
Mary B. Meikle
National VA RR&D Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Loudness balance techniques are commonly employed to match the loudness of tinnitus using either pulsed or continuous tones; however, it is not known whether the tone duration affects the observed loudness matches. In this study, hearing thresholds and tinnitus loudness matches were measured in 26 subjects with chronic tinnitus using both pulsed and continuous tones. Subjects' thresholds and loudness matches were determined at 11 frequencies between 0.5 and 10 kHz. No significant differences were found between pulsed versus continuous measures, either for thresholds or for loudness matches. There were, however, nine subjects (34.5% of the group) who showed relatively large differences (≥10 dB) at one or more test frequencies. These "outlier" values did not show systematic trends; some were positive, some negative. In conclusion, studies employing group data appear to be comparable if group sizes are sufficiently large (e.g., ≥ 25 subjects). Studies employing smaller numbers of subjects may, however, be vulnerable to potential positive or negative biases introduced by one or more outliers.

Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance

Key Words

Continuous - high-frequency hearing - intermittent - loudness - pulsed - tinnitus


Publication History

Article published online:
29 April 2022

© 1999. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • American National Standards Institute. (1989). American National Standard: Specifications for Audiometers. (ANSI S3.6–1989). New York: ANSI.
  • Aran J-M, Dauman R, eds. (1992). Proceedings IV International Tinnitus Seminar Bordeaux. New York: Kugler.
  • Bailey Q. (1979). Audiological aspects of tinnitus. Aust J Audiol 1:19–23.
  • Brown SC. (1990). Older Americans and Tinnitus: A Demographic Study and Chartbook. GRI Monograph Series A, No. 2. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University.
  • Burns EM. (1984). A comparison of variability among measurements of subjective tinnitus and objective stimuli. Audiology 23:426–440.
  • Carhart R, Jerger JF. (1959). Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 24:330–345.
  • Coles RRA, Baskill JL, Sheldrake JB. (1984). Measurement and management of tinnitus. Part I. Measurement. J Laryngol Otol 98:1171–1176.
  • Douek E, Reid J. (1968). The diagnostic value of tinnitus pitch. J Laryngol Otol 82:1039–1042.
  • Downie NM, Heath RW (1965). Basic Statistical Methods. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Evered D, Lawrenson G, eds. (1981). CIBA Foundation Symposium 85. Tinnitus. London: Pitman.
  • Fausti SA, Frey RH, Erickson DA, Rappaport BZ, Cleary EJ, Brummett RE. (1979). Asystem for evaluating auditory function from 8,000–20,000 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 66:1713–1718.
  • Fausti SA, Frey RH, Henry JA, Knutsen JL, Olson DJ. (1990). Reliability and validity of high-frequency (8–20 kHz) thresholds obtained on a computer-based audiometer as compared to a documented laboratory system. J Am Acad Audiol 1:162–170.
  • Fausti SA, Frey RH, Henry JA, Olson DJ, Schaffer HI. (1993). High-frequency testing techniques and instrumentation for early detection of ototoxicity. J Rehabil Res Dev 30:333–341.
  • Feldman Η, ed. (1987). Proceedings III International Tinnitus Seminar Munster. Karlsruhe, West Germany: Harsch Verlag.
  • Fowler EP. (1937). The diagnosis of diseases of the neural mechanism of hearing by the aid of sounds well above threshold. Trans Am Otol Soc 27:207–219.
  • Fowler EP. (1940). Head noises—significance, measurement and importance in diagnosis and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol 32:903–914.
  • Fowler EP. (1942). The "illusion of loudness" of tinnitus-its etiology and treatment. Laryngoscope 52:275–285.
  • Fulton RT, Lloyd LL. (1975). Auditory Assessment of the Difficult-to-Test. Baltimore: Williams & Williams Co.
  • Goodwin ΡΕ, Johnson RM. (1980). The loudness of tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol 90:353–359.
  • Green DS. (1972a). Pure tone air conduction thresholds. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 67–86.
  • Green DS. (1972b). Threshold tone decay. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 249–270.
  • Harbert F, Weiss BG, Wilpizeski CR. (1968). Suprathreshold auditory adaptation in normal and pathologic ears. J Speech Hear Res 11:268–278.
  • Hazell JWP. (1981). Measurement of tinnitus in humans. In: Evered D, Lawrenson G, eds. Tinnitus. CIBA Foundation Symposium 85. London: Pitman, 35–48.
  • Hazell JWP, ed. (1987). Tinnitus. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Hirsh IJ. (1952). The Measurement of Hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hochberg I, Waltzman S. (1972). Comparison of pulsed and continuous tone thresholds in patients with tinnitus. Audiology 11:337–342.
  • Hood JD. (1972). Fundamentals of identification of sensorineural hearing loss. Sound 6:21–26.
  • House JW, Miller L, House PR. (1977). Severe tinnitus: treatment with biofeedback training (results in 41 cases). Trans Am Acad Opthal Otolaryngol 84:697–703.
  • Jakes SC, Hallam RC, Chambers CC, Hinchcliffe R. (1986). Matched and self-reported loudness of tinnitus: methods and sources of error. Audiology 25:92–100.
  • Jerger J. (1960). Bekesy audiometry in analysis of auditory disorders. J Speech Hear Res 3:275–287.
  • Kitahara M, ed. (1988). Tinnitus Pathophysiology and Management. New York: Igaku-Shoin.
  • Matsuhira T, Yamashita K, Yasuda M. (1992). Estimation of the loudness of tinnitus from matching tests. Br J Audiol 26:387–395.
  • McFadden D, Wightman FL. (1983). Audition: some relations between normal and pathological hearing. Ann Rev Psychol 34:95–128.
  • Meikle MB, Henry JA, Mitchell CM. (1995). Methods for matching the loudness of tinnitus using external tones. In: Reich GE, Vernon JA, eds. Fifth International Tinnitus Seminar. Portland, OR: American Tinnitus Association, 178–179.
  • Melding PS, Goodey RJ, Thome PR. (1978). The use of intravenous lidocaine in the diagnosis and treatment of tinnitus. J Laryngol Otol 92:115–121.
  • Mineau SM, Schlauch RS. (1997). Threshold measurement for patients with tinnitus: pulsed or continuous tones. Am J Audiol 6:52–56.
  • Mitchell CR, Vernon JA, Creedon TA. (1993). Measuring tinnitus parameters: loudness, pitch, and maskability. J Am Acad Audiol 4:139–151.
  • Norusis MJ. (1986). SPSS/PC+. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
  • Penner MJ. (1983). Variability in matches to subjective tinnitus. J Speech Hear Res 26:263–267.
  • Penner MJ. (1986). Magnitude estimation and the "paradoxical" loudness of tinnitus. J Speech Hear Res 29:407–112.
  • Reed GF. (1960). An audiometry study of two hundred cases of subjective tinnitus. Arch Otolaryngol 71:94–104.
  • Risey J, Briner W, Guth PS, Norris CH. (1989). The superiority of the Goodwin procedure over the traditional procedure in measuring the loudness level of tinnitus. Ear Hear 10:318–322.
  • Shulman A, ed. (1981). Proceedings I International Tinnitus Seminar. J Laryngol Otol 4(Suppl):l-217.
  • Shulman A, Tonndorf J, Feldmann Η, Vernon J, Aran J-M, eds. (1991). Tinnitus—Diagnosis/Treatment. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
  • Stevens SS, Davis H. (1947). Hearing: Its Psychology and Physiology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Tyler RS, Conrad-Armes D. (1983). The determination of tinnitus loudness considering the effects of recruitment. J Speec Hear Res 26:59–72.
  • Vernon J. (1977). Attempts to relieve tinnitus. J Am Audiol Soc 2:124–131.
  • Vernon JA. (1975). Tinnitus. Hearing Aid J 29:13.
  • Vernon JA. (1976). The loudness (?) of tinnitus. Hear Speech Action 44:17–19.
  • Vernon JA. (1987). Assessment of the tinnitus patient. In: Hazell JWP, ed. Tinnitus. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 71–87.
  • Vernon JA, Johnson RM, Schleuning AJ, Mitchell CR. (1980). Masking and tinnitus. Audiol Hear Educ 6:5–9.
  • Vernon JA, Meikle MB. (1981). Tinnitus masking: unresolved problems. In: Evered D, Lawrenson G, eds. Tinnitus. CIBA Symposium 85. London: Pitman, 239–256.
  • Vernon JA, Meikle MB. (1985). Clinical insights into possible physiological mechanisms of tinnitus. In: Myers E, ed. New Dimensions in Otorhinolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Vol. 1. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
  • Vernon JA, Meikle MB. (1988). Measurement of tinnitus: an update. In: Kitahara M, ed. Tinnitus. Pathophysiology and Management. Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin, 36–52.
  • Vernon JA, Schleuning A, Odell L, Hughes F. (1977). A tinnitus clinic. Ear Nose Throat J 56:58–71.
  • Welkowitz J, Ewen RB, Cohen J. (1976). Introductory Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
  • Wright HN. (1969). Bekesy audiometry and temporal summation. J Speech Hear Res 12:865–874.
  • Yantis PA. (1985). Puretone air-conduction testing. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 153–169.
  • Yantis PA. (1994). Puretone air-conduction threshold testing. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 97–108.