PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(08): 998-1007
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748149
Original Article

Factors Associated with Receiving No Maternal or Neonatal Interventions among Periviable Deliveries

Madeline F. Perry 
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Sierra Hajdu
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Robert M. Rossi
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Emily A. DeFranco 
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to quantify the influence of maternal sociodemographic, medical, and pregnancy characteristics on not receiving maternal and neonatal interventions with deliveries occurring at 22 to 23 weeks of gestation.

Study design This was a case–control study of U.S. live births at 220/6 to 236/7 weeks of gestation using vital statistics birth records from 2012 to 2016. We analyzed births that received no interventions for periviable delivery. Births were defined as having no interventions if they did not receive maternal (cesarean delivery, maternal hospital transfer, or antenatal corticosteroid administration) or neonatal interventions (neonatal intensive care unit admission, surfactant administration, antibiotic administration, or assisted ventilation). Logistic regression estimated the influence of maternal and pregnancy factors on the receipt of no interventions when delivery occurred at 22 to 23 weeks.

Results Of 19,844,580 U.S. live births in 2012–2016, 24,379 (0.12%) occurred at 22 to 23 weeks; 54.3% of 22-week deliveries and 15.7% of 23-week deliveries received no interventions. Non-Hispanic Black maternal race was associated with no maternal interventions at 22 and 23 weeks. Private insurance, singleton pregnancy, and small for gestational age were associated with receiving no neonatal interventions at 22 and 23 weeks of gestation.

Conclusion Withholding or refusing maternal and neonatal interventions occurs frequently at the threshold of viability. Our data highlight various sociodemographic, pregnancy, and medical factors associated with decisions to not offer or receive maternal or neonatal interventions when birth occurs at the threshold of viability. The data elucidate observed practices and may assist in the development of further research.

Key Points

  • Non-Hispanic Black race was associated with receiving no maternal interventions.

  • Indicators of high socioeconomic status were associated with no neonatal inventions.

  • Patient-level factors influence the receipt of no interventions for periviable birth.

Keywords

periviable birth - race and ethnicity - socioeconomic status - preterm birth - interventions

The abstract for this study was presented as a poster at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine - The Pregnancy Meeting; February 3-8 2020, Grapevine, TX.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 19. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 17. Februar 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Mai 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus No. 6: periviable birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) e187-e199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Younge N, Goldstein RF, Bann CM. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes among periviable infants. N Engl J Med 2017; 376 (07) 617-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Patel RM, Rysavy MA, Bell EF, Tyson JE. Survival of infants born at periviable gestational ages. Clin Perinatol 2017; 44 (02) 287-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Raju TNK, Mercer BM, Burchfield DJ, Joseph Jr GF. Periviable birth: executive summary of a joint workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (05) 1083-1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rossi RM, DeFranco EA. Maternal complications associated with periviable birth. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (01) 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rysavy MA, Li L, Bell EF. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (19) 1801-1811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tucker Edmonds B, Fager C, Srinivas S, Lorch S. Racial and ethnic differences in use of intubation for periviable neonates. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (05) e1120-e1127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tucker Edmonds B, Fager C, Srinivas S, Lorch S. Predictors of cesarean delivery for periviable neonates. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118 (01) 49-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 National Center for Vital Health Statistics. . Vital Statistics Online Portal Data. Accessed March 01, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/vitalstatsonline.htm
    PubMed
  • 10 National Center for Health Statistics. . Revision of the U.S. standard certificates of live birth; 2003. Accessed March 01, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/revisions-of-the-us-standard-certificates-and-reports.htm
    PubMed
  • 11 National Center for Health Statistics. . Guide to completing the facility worksheets for the certificate of live birth and report of fetal death. 2019. Accessed March 01, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/facility-worksheets-guide.htm?Sort=URL%3A%3Aasc
    PubMed
  • 12 Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Kirmeyer SE, Gregory ECW. Measuring gestational age in vital statistics data: Transitioning to the obstetric estimate. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015; 64 (05) 1-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 World Health Organization. . Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series. 2000
  • 14 Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (02) 163-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bennett DA. How can I deal with missing data in my study?. Aust N Z J Public Health 2001; 25 (05) 464-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Feltman DM, Fritz KA, Datta A. et al. Antenatal periviability counseling and decision making: a retrospective examination by the investigating neonatal decisions for extremely early deliveries study group. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (02) 184-195
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 1997; 18 (01) 341-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, Washington AE. Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (04) 335-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tucker MJ, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Hsia J. The Black-White disparity in pregnancy-related mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prevalence and case-fatality rates. Am J Public Health 2007; 97 (02) 247-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 FitzGerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2017; 18 (01) 19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Casey JA, Pollak J, Glymour MM, Mayeda ER, Hirsch AG, Schwartz BS. Measures of SES for electronic health record-based research. Am J Prev Med 2018; 54 (03) 430-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kim MK, Lee SM, Bae SH. et al. Socioeconomic status can affect pregnancy outcomes and complications, even with a universal healthcare system. Int J Equity Health 2018; 17 (01) 2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Garcia-Tizon Larroca S, Arevalo-Serrano J, Duran Vila A. et al. Human Development Index (HDI) of the maternal country of origin as a predictor of perinatal outcomes - a longitudinal study conducted in Spain. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17 (01) 314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brown CE, Engelberg RA, Sharma R. et al. Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and healthcare intensity at the end of life. J Palliat Med 2018; 21 (09) 1308-1316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ting JY, Kingdom JC, Shah PS. Antenatal glucocorticoids, magnesium sulfate, and mode of birth in preterm fetal small for gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218 (2S) S818-S828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kim WJ, Han YS, Ko HS, Park IY, Shin JC, Wie JH. Antenatal corticosteroids and outcomes of preterm small-for-gestational-age neonates in a single medical center. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2018; 61 (01) 7-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Litmanovitz I, Reichman B, Arnon S. et al; Israel Neonatal Network. Perinatal factors associated with active intensive treatment at the border of viability: a population-based study. J Perinatol 2015; 35 (09) 705-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002; 21 (02) 60-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Howell EA, Zeitlin J. Quality of care and disparities in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2017; 44 (01) 13-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gadson A, Akpovi E, Mehta PK. Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome. Semin Perinatol 2017; 41 (05) 308-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Haghighat N, Hu M, Laurent O, Chung J, Nguyen P, Wu J. Comparison of birth certificates and hospital-based birth data on pregnancy complications in Los Angeles and Orange County, California. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16 (01) 93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Parker K, Horowitz J, Brown A, Fry R, Cohn D, Igielnik R. What unites and divides urban, suburban and rural communities. Pew Research Center Report; 2018
    Google Scholar