Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748148
Electronic Health Record-Embedded, Behavioral Science-Informed System for Smoking Cessation for the Parents of Pediatric Patients
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00035026/202202/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0042-1748148_210319ra-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background Helping parents quit smoking is a public health priority. However, parents are rarely, if ever, offered tobacco use treatment through pediatric settings. Clinical decision support (CDS) systems developed for the workflows of pediatric primary care may support consistent screening, treatment, and referral.
Objectives This study aimed to develop a CDS system by using human-centered design (HCD) that identifies parents who smoke, provides motivational messages to quit smoking (informed by behavioral science), and supports delivery of evidence-based tobacco treatment.
Methods Our multidisciplinary team applied a rigorous HCD process involving analysis of the work environment, user involvement in formative design, iterative improvements, and evaluation of the system's use in context with the following three cohorts: (1) parents who smoke, (2) pediatric clinicians, and (3) clinic staff. Participants from each cohort were presented with scenario-based, high-fidelity mockups of system components and then provided input related to their role in using the CDS system.
Results We engaged 70 representative participants including 30 parents, 30 clinicians, and 10 clinic staff. A key theme of the design review sessions across all cohorts was the need to automate functions of the system. Parents emphasized a system that presented information in a simple way, highlighted benefits of quitting smoking, and allowed direct connection to treatment. Pediatric clinicians emphasized automating tobacco treatment. Clinical staff emphasized screening for parent smoking via several modalities prior to the patient's visit. Once the system was developed, most parents (80%) reported that it was easy to use, and the majority of pediatricians reported that they would use the system (97%) and were satisfied with it (97%).
Conclusion A CDS system to support parental tobacco cessation in pediatric primary care, developed through an HCD process, proved easy to use and acceptable to parents, clinicians, and office staff. This preliminary work justifies evaluating the impact of the system on helping parents quit smoking.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed by the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Institutional Review Board.
Publication History
Received: 20 December 2021
Accepted: 15 March 2022
Article published online:
18 May 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health.. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2014
- 2 Tsai J, Homa DM, Gentzke AS. et al. Exposure to secondhand smoke among nonsmokers - United States, 1988-2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018; 67 (48) 1342-1346
- 3 Office on Smoking and Health (US). Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2006
- 4 den Exter Blokland EAW, Engels RCME, Hale III WW, Meeus W, Willemsen MC. Lifetime parental smoking history and cessation and early adolescent smoking behavior. Prev Med 2004; 38 (03) 359-368
- 5 Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V. et al. 21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (04) 341-350
- 6 Rosen LJ, Noach MB, Winickoff JP, Hovell MF. Parental smoking cessation to protect young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2012; 129 (01) 141-152
- 7 Farber HJ, Walley SC, Groner JA, Nelson KE. Section on Tobacco Control. Clinical practice policy to protect children from tobacco, nicotine, and tobacco smoke. Pediatrics 2015; 136 (05) 1008-1017
- 8 Winickoff JP, Nabi-Burza E, Chang Y. et al. Implementation of a parental tobacco control intervention in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (01) 109-117
- 9 Daly JB, Mackenzie LJ, Freund M, Wolfenden L, Roseby R, Wiggers JH. Interventions by health care professionals who provide routine child health care to reduce tobacco smoke exposure in children: a review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170 (02) 138-147
- 10 Behbod B, Sharma M, Baxi R, Roseby R, Webster P. Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 1: CD001746
- 11 Jenssen BP, Kelly MK, Faerber J. et al. Parent preferences for pediatric clinician messaging to promote smoking cessation treatment. Pediatrics 2020; 146 (01) e20193901
- 12 Jenssen BP, Kelly MK, Faerber J. et al. Pediatrician delivered smoking cessation messages for parents: a latent class approach to behavioral phenotyping. Acad Pediatr 2021; 21 (01) 129-138
- 13 Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R. et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 (01) 29-43
- 14 Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J. et al. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2020; 370: m3216
- 15 Boyle R, Solberg L, Fiore M. Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 12 (12) CD008743
- 16 Matkin W, Ordóñez-Mena JM, Hartmann-Boyce J. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 5: CD002850
- 17 Vidrine JI, Shete S, Li Y. et al. The Ask-Advise-Connect approach for smokers in a safety net healthcare system: a group-randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2013; 45 (06) 737-741
- 18 Hood-Medland EA, Stewart SL, Nguyen H. et al. Health system implementation of a tobacco quitline eReferral. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (04) 735-742
- 19 Sharifi M, Adams WG, Winickoff JP, Guo J, Reid M, Boynton-Jarrett R. Enhancing the electronic health record to increase counseling and quit-line referral for parents who smoke. Acad Pediatr 2014; 14 (05) 478-484
- 20 Jenssen BP, Bryant-Stephens T, Leone FT, Grundmeier RW, Fiks AG. Clinical decision support tool for parental tobacco treatment in primary care. Pediatrics 2016; 137 (05) e20154185
- 21 Jenssen BP, Shelov ED, Bonafide CP, Bernstein SL, Fiks AG, Bryant-Stephens T. Clinical decision support tool for parental tobacco treatment in hospitalized children. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (02) 399-411
- 22 Jenssen BP, Muthu N, Kelly MK. et al. Parent eReferral to tobacco quitline: a pragmatic randomized trial in pediatric primary care. Am J Prev Med 2019; 57 (01) 32-40
- 23 Nabi-Burza E, Drehmer JE, Hipple Walters B. et al. Treating parents for tobacco use in the pediatric setting: the clinical effort against secondhand smoke exposure cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 2019; 173 (10) 931-939
- 24 Nabi-Burza E, Winickoff JP, Drehmer JE. et al. Innovations in parental smoking cessation assistance delivered in the child healthcare setting. Transl Behav Med 2020; 10 (04) 1039-1052
- 25 Scheffers-van Schayck T, Hipple Walters B, Otten R, Kleinjan M. Implementation of a proactive referral tool for child healthcare professionals to encourage and facilitate parental smoking cessation in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21 (01) 973
- 26 Gulliksen J, Göransson B, Boivie I, Blomkvist S, Persson J, Cajander Å. Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behav Inf Technol 2003; 22 (06) 397-409
- 27 Belden JL, Wegier P, Patel J. et al. Designing a medication timeline for patients and physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (02) 95-105
- 28 Curran RL, Kukhareva PV, Taft T. et al. Integrated displays to improve chronic disease management in ambulatory care: A SMART on FHIR application informed by mixed-methods user testing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (08) 1225-1234
- 29 ISO 9241–210:2019 Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Accessed September 29, 2021 at: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/07/75/77520.html
- 30 Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press; 1993
- 31 Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Inform 2004; 37 (01) 56-76
- 32 Thayer JG, Ferro DF, Miller JM. et al. Human-centered development of an electronic health record-embedded, interactive information visualization in the emergency department using fast healthcare interoperability resources. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (07) 1401-1410
- 33 Marcy TW, Kaplan B, Connolly SW, Michel G, Shiffman RN, Flynn BS. Developing a decision support system for tobacco use counselling using primary care physicians. Inform Prim Care 2008; 16 (02) 101-109
- 34 Rush WA, Schleyer TKL, Kirshner M. et al. Integrating tobacco dependence counseling into electronic dental records: a multi-method approach. J Dent Educ 2014; 78 (01) 31-39
- 35 Winickoff JP, Buckley VJ, Palfrey JS, Perrin JM, Rigotti NA. Intervention with parental smokers in an outpatient pediatric clinic using counseling and nicotine replacement. Pediatrics 2003; 112 (05) 1127-1133
- 36 Fiks AG, Grundmeier RW, Margolis B. et al. Comparative effectiveness research using the electronic medical record: an emerging area of investigation in pediatric primary care. J Pediatr 2012; 160 (05) 719-724
- 37 Tong EK, Strouse R, Hall J, Kovac M, Schroeder SA. National survey of U.S. health professionals' smoking prevalence, cessation practices, and beliefs. Nicotine Tob Res 2010; 12 (07) 724-733
- 38 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
- 39 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
- 40 Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Rodgers A, Gu Y, Dobson R. Mobile phone text messaging and app-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10 (10) CD006611
- 41 Britto MT, Jimison HB, Munafo JK, Wissman J, Rogers ML, Hersh W. Usability testing finds problems for novice users of pediatric portals. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (05) 660-669
- 42 Wright PC, Monk AF. The use of think-aloud evaluation methods in design. SIGCHI Bull 1991; 23 (01) 55-57
- 43 Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud 1993; 38 (03) 475-487
- 44 Ortega Egea JM, Román González MV. Explaining physicians' acceptance of EHCR systems: an extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Comput Human Behav 2011; 27 (01) 319-332
- 45 Nielson J, Mack RL. eds. Usability Inspection Methods. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1994
- 46 Salmon P, Jenkins D, Stanton N, Walker G. Hierarchical task analysis vs. cognitive work analysis: comparison of theory, methodology and contribution to system design. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2010; 11 (06) 504-531
- 47 Stanton NA. Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. Appl Ergon 2006; 37 (01) 55-79
- 48 Faulkner L. Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2003; 35 (03) 379-383
- 49 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices: guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. Available at: Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices | FDA. Accessed March 29, 2022
- 50 Wang X, Kim TC, Hegde S. et al. Design and evaluation of an integrated, patient-focused electronic health record display for emergency medicine. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (04) 693-706
- 51 McGeorge N, Hegde S, Berg RL. et al. Assessment of innovative emergency department information displays in a clinical simulation center. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 2015; 9 (04) 329-346
- 52 Clark LN, Benda NC, Hegde S. et al. Usability evaluation of an emergency department information system prototype designed using cognitive systems engineering techniques. Appl Ergon 2017; 60: 356-365
- 53 Overhage JM, Johnson KB. Pediatrician electronic health record time use for outpatient encounters. Pediatrics 2020; 146 (06) e20194017
- 54 Fiks AG, Alessandrini EA, Forrest CB, Khan S, Localio AR, Gerber A. Electronic medical record use in pediatric primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (01) 38-44
- 55 Gardner RL, Cooper E, Haskell J. et al. Physician stress and burnout: the impact of health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (02) 106-114
- 56 Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD. et al. Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med 2017; 15 (05) 419-426
- 57 Blythe MJ, Del Beccaro MA. Committee on Adolescence, Council on Clinical and Information Technology. Standards for health information technology to ensure adolescent privacy. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (05) 987-990
- 58 Webber EC, Brick D, Scibilia JP, Dehnel P. Council on Clinical Information Technology, Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management, Section on Telehealth Care. Electronic communication of the health record and information with pediatric patients and their guardians. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (01) e20191359
- 59 Furniss D. Beyond problem identification: valuing methods in a ‘system usability practice’. Available at: Beyond Problem Identification: Valuing methods in a ‘system of usability practice’ (ucl.ac.uk). Accessed March 28, 2022
- 60 Yusop N, Grundy J, Vasa R. Reporting usability defects: a systematic literature review. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 2019; 43 (09) 848-867