PDF herunterladen
J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11(06): 309-315
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748059
Case Report

Cochlear Implantation of Auditory Neuropathy

Patricia G. Trautwein
Department of Children's Auditory Research and Evaluation, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California
,
Yvonne S. Sininger
Department of Children's Auditory Research and Evaluation, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California
,
Ralph Nelson
Department of Children's Auditory Research and Evaluation, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen  Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a hearing disorder that presents with a grossly abnormal or absent neural response as measured by evoked potentials in the presence of normal outer hair cell function evidenced by present otoacoustic emissions or cochlear microphonics. Rehabilitation for patients with AN is challenging due to abnormal temporal encoding at the auditory nerve leading to severely impaired speech perception. Although patients with AN may demonstrate improvement in thresholds with amplification, temporal encoding dysfunction, and consequently speech perception degradation, is not alleviated by amplification. Another issue is the heterogeneity of the AN population in terms of audiologic and neurologic findings, in addition to uncertain etiology and pathophysiology. For children with prelingual onset of AN, development of auditory and oral communication skills is particularly compromised. All children with hearing loss in the severe-to-profound range who do not benefit from conventional amplification can be considered candidates for a cochlear implant (CI). This paper presents a case study of a child with AN who received a CI. Whereas no synchronous neural response auditory brainstem response could be elicited to acoustic stimuli, an electrically evoked auditory nerve action potential was evident following implantation, suggesting restoration to some degree of neural synchrony. Significant improvement in speech perception was found post-CI. Recommendation to implant all patients with AN would be premature, but these findings suggest that electrical stimulation in some cases of auditory neuropathy can be a viable option.

Abbreviations: AN = auditory neuropathy, CI = cochlear implant, CM = cochlear microphonic, DSL = desired sensation level, EAP = electrically evoked compound action potential, ESP = Early Speech Perception test, IHC = inner hair cells, LTASS = long-term average speech spectrum, NRT = neural response telemetry, OAE = otoacoustic emission, TAC = Test of Auditory Comprehension, TEOAE = transient evoked otoacoustic emission

Key Words

Auditory neuropathy - cochlear implant - electrically evoked compound action potential - speech perception


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. April 2022

© 2000. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, Firszt JB, Hughes ML, Hong SH, Staller SJ. (1999). Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 20:45–59.
  • Araki S, Kawano A, Seldon L, Shepard RK, Funasaka S, Clark GM. (1998). Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion neuron survival and size in deafened kittens. Laryngoscope 108:687–695.
  • Berlin CI, Goforth-Barter L, St. John P, Hood L. (1999 February). Auditory Neuropathy: Three Time Courses After Early Identification. Paper presented at the Twenty Second Mid-Winter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg, FL.
  • Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Cecola P, Jackson DF, Szabo P. (1993). Does type I afferent neuron dysfunction reveal itself through lack of efferent suppression? Hear Res 65:40–50.
  • Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Roland JT, Staller SJ, Hoffman RA. (1999). Early results using the CI24M in children. Am J Otol 20:198–204.
  • Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG. (1995). The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to fitting personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 97:1854–1864.
  • Deltenre P, Mansbach AL, Bozet C, Clercx A, Hecox KE. (1997). Auditory neuropathy: a report on three cases with early onsets and major neonatal illnesses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 104:17–22.
  • Doyle KJ, Sininger YS, Starr A. (1998). Auditory neuropathy in childhood. In: The Laryngoscope. 108 Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1374–1377.
  • Gantz BJ, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. (1994). Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential. Am J Otol 15:137–144.
  • Gstoettner W, Plenk Η Jr, Franz P, Hamzavi J, Baumgartner W, Czerny C, Ehrenberger K. (1997). Cochlear implant deep insertion: extent of insertion trauma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 117:274–277.
  • Harrison RV. (1998). An animal model of auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear 19:355–361.
  • Ling D. (1978). Speech development in hearing-impaired children. J Communication Disord 11:119–124.
  • McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Vandali AE, Clark GM. (1992). A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the spectral maximum sound processor (SMSP) and the MSP (MULTIPEAK) processor. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 112:752–761.
  • Mitchell A, Miller JM, Finger PA, Heller JW, Raphael Y, Altschuler RA. (1997). Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig. Hear Res 105:30–43.
  • Miyamoto RT, Kirk KI, Svirsky MA, Sehgal ST. (1999). Communication skills in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 119:219–224.
  • Moog JS, Geers AE. (1990). Early Speech Perception Test. St. Louis: Central Institute for the Deaf.
  • O'Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM, Tait Μ. (1998). Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 19:762–767.
  • O'Leary MJ, Fayad J, House WF, Linthicum FH Jr. (1991). Electrode insertion trauma in cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100(9 pt l):695–699.
  • Rance G, Beer DE, Cone-Wesson B, Shepherd RK, Dowell RC, King AM, Rickards FW, Clark GM. (1999). Clinical findings in a group of infants and young children with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear 20:238–252.
  • Seewald RC, Ross M, Spiro MK. (1985). Selecting amplification characteristics for young hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 6:48–53.
  • Shannon RV. (1993). Quantitative comparison of electrically and acoustically evoked auditory perception: implications for location of perceptual mechanisms. Progr Brain Res 97:261–269.
  • Sininger YS, Hood LJ, Starr A, Berlin CI, Picton TW. (1995). Hearing loss due to auditory neuropathy. Audiology Today 7:10–13.
  • Sininger YS, Trautwein PG, Shallop JK, Fabry LB, Starr A. (1999, February). Electrical Activation of the Auditory Nerve in Patients with Auditory Neuropathy. Paper presented at the Twenty-Second Mid-Winter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg, FL.
  • Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Staller SJ. (1994) Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 15(Suppl 2):15–27.
  • Starr A, Picton TW, Sininger Y, Hood LJ, Berlin CI. (1996). Auditory neuropathy. Brain 119:741–753.
  • Tasaki I, Davis H, Eldredge DH. (1954). Exploration of cochlear potentials in guinea pig with microelectrode. J Acoust Soc Am 26:765–773.
  • Trammell JL, Owens SL. (1977). Test of Auditory Comprehension. North Hollywood, CA: Foreworks Publishing.
  • Zeng FG, Oba S, Garde S, Sininger Y, Starr A. (1999). Temporal and speech processing deficits in auditory neuropathy. Neural Report 10:3429–3435.
  • Zhou R, Abbas PJ, Assouline JS. (1995a). Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in myelin-deficient mice. Hear Res 88:98–106.
  • Zhou R, Assouline JG, Abbas PJ, Messing A, Gantz BJ. (1995b). Anatomical and physiological measures of auditory system in mice with peripheral myelin deficiency. Hear Res 88:87–97.