Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2022; 14(01): e127-e132
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1747673
Research Article

Evaluation of the Content of Ophthalmology Fellowship Program Web sites

Peter Alsaloum
1   Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Matthew Alsaloum
2   Medical Scientist Training Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
,
Tyler J. Kim
1   Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
,
David X. Zheng
1   Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Carolina C. S. Valentim
3   Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Justin C. Muste
3   Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
4   Transitional Year Residency, Richmond Medical Center, Richmond, Ohio
,
Jeffrey M. Goshe
5   Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Rishi P. Singh
3   Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To assess the availability and content of fellowship program Web sites (FPWs) among ophthalmology subspecialties.

Design This is a cross-sectional study.

Subjects Web sites of all Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology-accredited fellowship programs in five subspecialties (i.e., surgical retina and vitreous; cornea, external disease, and refractive surgery; glaucoma; neuro-ophthalmology; and pediatric ophthalmology).

Methods FPWs were assessed for the presence of 26 key content criteria encompassing program demographics (n = 13), features (n = 10), and social life (n = 3). The presence of each content criterion as well as the content criteria groups were compared across subspecialties.

Main Outcome Measures The main outcome measured is the average percentage of key content criteria present among ophthalmology fellowship Web sites.

Results Among 266 accredited fellowship programs, 240 (90.2%) had Web sites. On average, Web sites reported 14.9 of 26 key content criteria (57.2%), 8.29 of 13 demographic criteria (63.8%), 5.84 of the 10 program features criteria (58.4%), and 0.705 of the 3 social life criteria (23.5%). Significant differences were identified among subspecialties in the presence of program description (p = 0.046), hospital affiliation (p < 0.001), names of current fellows (p = 0.004), case diversity (p = 0.001), and surgical statistics (p = 0.015). The average number of key criteria differed between subspecialties (p < 0.001).

Conclusion There is significant heterogeneity in program fellowship Web site content among ophthalmology subspecialties. Information regarding social life, such as wellness programs and community information, was largely absent across all disciplines. Addressing missing information on ophthalmology FPWs may help optimize program-applicant fit.

Keywords

fellowship - Web site - Web site content - ophthalmology fellowships


Publication History

Received: 22 October 2021

Accepted: 11 January 2022

Article published online:
01 June 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Tang OY, Ruddell JH, Hilliard RW, Schiffman FJ, Daniels AH. Improving the online presence of residency programs to ameliorate COVID-19's impact on residency applications. Postgrad Med 2021; 133 (04) 404-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rockney D, Benson CA, Blackburn BG. et al. Virtual recruitment is here to stay: a survey of ID fellowship program directors and matched applicants regarding their 2020 virtual recruitment experiences. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8 (08) b383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dossani R, Karsy M, Waqas M, Menger R, Guthikonda B. A survey of applicant views regarding the neurosurgical fellowship application process. World Neurosurg 2020; 139: e373-e382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hansberry DR, Bornstein J, Agarwal N, McClure KE, Deshmukh SP, Long S. An assessment of radiology residency program websites. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (04) 663-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Slanetz PJ, Cooke E, Jambhekar K, Chong A. Branding your radiology residency and fellowship programs in the COVID-19 era. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17 (12) 1673-1675
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wang KY, Babu J, Zhang B, Jami M, Musharbash F, LaPorte D. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the orthopaedic surgery residency application process: what can we learn?. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2021; 5 (10) e21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Everett AS, Strickler S, Marcrom SR, McDonald AM. Students' perspectives and concerns for the 2020 to 2021 radiation oncology interview season. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6 (01) 100554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Winters RC, Hendey GW. Do web sites catch residency applicants?. Acad Emerg Med 1999; 6 (09) 968-972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Deloney LA, Perrot LJ, Lensing SY, Jambhekar K. Radiology resident recruitment: a study of the impact of web-based information and interview day activities. Acad Radiol 2014; 21 (07) 931-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Embi PJ, Desai S, Cooney TG. Use and utility of web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants. J Med Internet Res 2003; 5 (03) e22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chu LF, Young CA, Zamora AK. et al. Self-reported information needs of anesthesia residency applicants and analysis of applicant-related web sites resources at 131 United States training programs. Anesth Analg 2011; 112 (02) 430-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bernstein SA, Gu A, Bernstein SL, Wei C, Vogel AC, Gold JA. Child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship program website content and accessibility. Acad Psychiatry 2021; 45 (04) 425-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wei C, Quan T, Wu T. et al. Assessment of the accessibility and content of dermatology fellowship websites. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 84 (05) 1423-1425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ruddell JH, Tang OY, Persaud B, Eltorai AEM, Daniels AH, Ng T. Thoracic surgery program websites: bridging the content gap for improved applicant recruitment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162 (03) 724-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Homer N, Yoon MK. Evaluation of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) fellowship program website content and quality. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 33 (06) 471-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gedde SJ, Budenz DL, Haft P, Tielsch JM, Lee Y, Quigley HA. Factors influencing career choices among graduating ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (07) 1247-1254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yousuf SJ, Kwagyan J, Jones LS. Applicants' choice of an ophthalmology residency program. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (02) 423-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Programs in Compliance, Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology Fellowship Compliance Committee. Accessed April 5, 2022 at: https://aupofcc.org/programs-in-complianceinstitution=&state=All&page=1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Liu C, White RW, Dumais S. Understanding web browsing behaviors through Weibull analysis of dwell time. In: SIGIR '10: Proceeding of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2010: 379-386
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mari S, Meyen R, Kim B. Resident-led organizational initiatives to reduce burnout and improve wellness. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19 (01) 437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cohen SA, Shea K, Imrie M. An update on the accessibility and quality of online information for pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellowships. Cureus 2021; 13 (09) e17802
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yan Q, Jensen K, Field A. et al. Critical evaluation of the efficiency of colorectal fellowship websites: cross-sectional study. JMIR Med Educ 2021; 7 (04) e30736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mukhdomi T, Woolley P, Mukhdomi J. et al. An evaluation of the online quality of content of United States Accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Training Programs. Anesth Pain Med 2021; 11 (03) e115981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Peyser A, Abittan B, Mullin C, Goldman RH. A content and quality evaluation of ACGME-accredited reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship program webpages. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38 (04) 895-899
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hu J, Zhen M, Olteanu C, Avram R. An evaluation of accessibility and content of microsurgery fellowship websites. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2016; 24 (03) 187-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Silvestre J, Guzman JZ, Abbatematteo JM, Chang B, Levin LS. Evaluation of content and accessibility of hand fellowship websites. Hand (N Y) 2015; 10 (03) 516-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gaeta TJ, Birkhahn RH, Lamont D, Banga N, Bove JJ. Aspects of residency programs' web sites important to student applicants. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12 (01) 89-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mahler SA, Wagner MJ, Church A, Sokolosky M, Cline DM. Importance of residency program web sites to emergency medicine applicants. J Emerg Med 2009; 36 (01) 83-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Creed PA, Searle J, Rogers ME. Medical specialty prestige and lifestyle preferences for medical students. Soc Sci Med 2010; 71 (06) 1084-1088
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar