CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · World J Nucl Med 2022; 21(01): 044-051
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1746173
Original Article

Critical Appraisal of Radionuclide Calibrators and Gamma Cameras Prior to Lutetium-177 Internal Dosimetry at Two South African Hospitals

Bronwin P. Van Wyk
1   Department of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Sefako Makgatho University, Ga-Rankuwa, South Africa
,
Francis Hasford
2   Department of Medical Physics, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
,
Nozipho E. Nyakale
1   Department of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Sefako Makgatho University, Ga-Rankuwa, South Africa
,
M. Mboyo-Di-Tamba Vangu
3   Department of Nuclear Medicine, Witwatersrand University, Johannesburg, South Africa
,
Bertus Oelofse
4   Department of Medical Physics, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa
,
Hector M. Leboea
4   Department of Medical Physics, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Introduction The functionality of radionuclide dose calibrator and nuclear medicine imaging systems hasa direct effect on the accuracy and preciseness of internal dosimetry evaluations. Our study, therefore, aimed to critically appraise the radionuclide calibrators and gamma cameras prior to Lutetium-177 (177Lu) internal dosimetry in a developing country.

Materials and Methods Two radionuclide calibrators' and three gamma cameras at two South African hospitals were critically appraised in preparation for internal dosimetry of 177Lu. The radionuclide calibrators' accuracy, linearity, and sample volume abilities were appraised. For the three gamma cameras, the uniformity, energy resolution, center of rotation, and collimator sensitivity were appraised. These appraisals were performed between the years 2014 and 2019.

Results The radionuclide calibrators' constancy, accuracy, linearity, and sample volume were within ± 5%. We also integrated a 177Lu calibration factor into one radionuclide calibrator's library. The three gamma cameras' uniformity was within 2 to 5%, energy resolution within 11%, center of rotation within 2 mm, and the sensitivity recorded for all low energy high resolution collimator.

Conclusion Our radionuclide calibrators passed the critical appraisal and may be confidently used for assaying 177Lu. All three cameras also passed critical appraisal and may be used to assess organ absorbed dose.

Ethical Approval

Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Research Ethics Committee approved this study, SMUREC Ethics Reference Number: SMUREC//M/114/2018: PG


University of Kwazulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee approved this study, BREC Ethics Reference Number: BE693/18.




Publication History

Article published online:
30 April 2022

© 2022. World Association of Radiopharmaceutical and Molecular Therapy (WARMTH). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Kwekkeboom DJ, Krenning EP. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2016; 30 (01) 179-191
  • 2 Bailey D, Humm J, Todd-Pokropek A, van Aswegen A. IAEA. Nuclear Medicine Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2014: 621-640
  • 3 https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_181 The selection, use, calibration, and quality assurance of radionuclide calibrators used in nuclear medicine: AAPM report No.181pp.1–13. Accessed March 13, 2022
  • 4 http://www.gammadata.se/assets/Uploads/CRC-15R-Manual-9250-0038-Rev-W-F18 CRC-15R radioisotope dose calibrator owner's manual. Manual stock no. 9250–0038. Accessed March 13, 2022
  • 5 Lassmann M, Chiesa C, Flux G, Bardiès M. EANM Dosimetry Committee guidance document: good practice of clinical dosimetry reporting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010
  • 6 https://www.hpcsa.co.za/Uploads/Legal/legislation/health_professions_ct_56_1974 Health professions act 56 of 1974. Regulations defining the scope of the profession of medical physicist. Government notice R310 in regulation gazette 4179. Accessed March 13, 2022
  • 7 Bailey D, Humm J, Todd-Pokropek A, van Aswegen A. Nuclear Medicine Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2014: 235-248
  • 8 Human Health Series No. 6. Quality Assurance for SPECT Systems. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2009
  • 9 National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Performance measurements of scintillation cameras. NEMA NU-1 2001. Accessed March 15, 2022 at: http://www.nema.org/stds/nu1.cfm
  • 10 https://pharmacyce.unm.edu/nuclear_program/freelessonfiles/vol15lesson4.pdf The Science of Measurement: A Primer on Radioactivity Dose Calibrators. Accessed March 13, 2022
  • 11 Santos JAM, Carrasco MF, Lencart J, Bastos AL. Syringe shape and positioning relative to efficiency volume inside dose calibrators and its role in nuclear medicine quality assurance programs. Appl RadiatIsot 2009; 67 (06) 1104-1109
  • 12 IAEA-TECDOC-602. Quality Control of Nuclear Medicine Instruments 1991. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1991
  • 13 Ballani N, Doughherty G. Simple Method to Measure Gamma Camera Energy Resolution. Elsevier Ltd; 2015: 172-175
  • 14 Quality Assurance for Radioactivity Measurement in Nuclear Medicine, Technical Reports Series No. 454. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006
  • 15 National electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Digital imaging and communications in medicine. DICOM PS 3.1. Accessed March 15, 2022 at: https://dicom.nema.org/dicom/2004/04_01pu.pdf
  • 16 Cherry S, Sorenson J, Phelps M. Physics in Nuclear Medicine. 4th edition.. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2012: 209-231 ;683
  • 17 Saad IE. Analysis of the geometrical and physical fluctuations while performing intrinsic uniformity test for Philips Forte gamma camera. International Journal of Recent Research and Applied Studies 2013; 15 (03) 269-279
  • 18 Quality Control Atlas for Scintillation Camera Systems. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2003
  • 19 Blust J. Gamma camera acceptance testing: the first quality control. J Nucl Med Technol 1994; 22: 58-60
  • 20 Sorenson J, Phelps M. Physics in Nuclear Medicine. 2nd edition.. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co.; 1987: 252-259 ,387–390