Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744537
Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Blefaroplasty
Funding None.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/fps/202301/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0042-1744537_210088or-1.jpg)
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the content and quality of popular videos about blepharoplasty treatment in YouTube. Four keywords “blepharoplasty,” “upper blepharoplasty,” “lower blepharoplasty,” and “blepharoplasty information” were searched in YouTube. After the videos were sorted by the number of views, the last 50 videos were based on general characteristics, primary purpose, information content, relevance, audiovisual quality, as well as viewer interaction index DISCERN score (minimum–maximum: 16–75), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score (minimum–maximum: 0–4), and Global Quality score (minimum–maximum: 0–5), and view rate formulas were calculated for each video. A total of the best 49 videos were evaluated in our study. The total number of views of these videos was 10,938,976. The total duration of these videos was 409minutes. The average duration of the videos was 8.35±8.38 (standard deviation [SD]). There was no significant (p>0.05) correlation between the measurement of DISCERN scores of the two observers. A significant (p<0.05) difference was observed between the JAMA score measurements of the two observers. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the GQS score measurements of the two observers. Currently, YouTube is not a viable resource for patients to learn about blepharoplasty. Physicians should be aware of the limitations and provide up-to-date and peer-reviewed content on the web site, and patients should also be warned about obtaining information.
Note
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' Contributions
All authors were involved in the conception and design of this study. F.S. and E.S.E. wrote the analysis plan. F.S. and E.S.E. conducted the search, screened all videos for eligibility and performed quality assessment, and data extraction. F.S. analyzed and interpreted the data. E.S.E. wrote the drafts of the manuscript and all other authors critically revised the different versions of the manuscript. Moreover, all authors were involved in discussing the results and interpreting the findings. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Publication History
Article published online:
13 September 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Cantisani C, Amori P, Vitiello G. et al. Nonsurgical blepharoplasty. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2019; 32 (06) e13119
- 2 Mack WP. Blepharoplasty complications. Facial Plast Surg 2012; 28 (03) 273-287
- 3 Weissman JD, Most SP. Upper lid blepharoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (01) 16-21
- 4 Hacker HD, Hollsten DA. Investigation of automated perimetry in the evaluation of patients for upper lid blepharoplasty. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 8 (04) 250-255
- 5 Biesman BS. Blepharoplasty. Semin Cutan Med Surg 1999; 18 (02) 129-138
- 6 Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. YouTube as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 2017; 44 (02) 90-96
- 7 Ozsoy-Unubol T, Alanbay-Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis 2020; 24 (02) 197-202
- 8 Almarghoub MA, Alghareeb MA, Alhammad AK, Alotaibi HF, Kattan AE. Plastic surgery on YouTube. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (01) e2586
- 9 Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis–a wakeup call?. J Rheumatol 2012; 39 (05) 899-903
- 10 Lee KN, Son GH, Park SH, Kim Y, Park ST. Youtube as a source of information and education on hysterectomy. J Korean Med Sci 2020; 35 (25) e196
- 11 Wu V, Lee DJ, Vescan A, Lee JM. Evaluating YouTube as a source of patient information for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Ear Nose Throat J 2020; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1177/0145561320962867.
- 12 Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016; 22 (03) 202-208
- 13 Biggs TC, Bird JH, Harries PG, Salib RJ. YouTube as a source of information on rhinosinusitis: the good, the bad and the ugly. J Laryngol Otol 2013; 127 (08) 749-754
- 14 Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One 2013; 8 (12) e82469
- 15 Korkmaz YN, Buyuk SK. YouTube as a patient-information source for cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2020; 57 (03) 327-332
- 16 Kuçuk B, Sirakaya E. An analysis of YouTube videos as educational resources for patients about refractive surgery. Cornea 2020; 39 (04) 491-494
- 17 Balasopoulou A, Kokkinos P, Pagoulatos D. et al. Symposium Recent advances and challenges in the management of retinoblastoma Globe - saving Treatments. BMC Ophthalmol 2017; 17 (01) 1
- 18 Zoumalan CI, Roostaeian J. Simplifying Blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 196e-213e
- 19 Mangan MS, Cakir A, Yurttaser Ocak S, Tekcan H, Balci S, Ozcelik Kose A. Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube. Strabismus 2020; 28 (04) 175-180
- 20 Sorensen JA, Pusz MD, Brietzke SE. YouTube as an information source for pediatric adenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (01) 65-70
- 21 Rogers SAG, Khan-Lim D, Manners RM. Does upper lid blepharoplasty improve contrast sensitivity?. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 28 (03) 163-165
- 22 Hollander MHJ, Contini M, Pott JW, Vissink A, Schepers RH, Jansma J. Functional outcomes of upper eyelid blepharoplasty: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (02) 294-309
- 23 Papadopulos NA, Hodbod M, Henrich G. et al. The effect of blepharoplasty on our patient's quality of life, emotional stability, and self-esteem. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) 377-383
- 24 Jacobsen AG, Brost B, Vorum H, Hargitai J. Functional benefits and patient satisfaction with upper blepharoplasty - evaluated by objective and subjective outcome measures. Acta Ophthalmol 2017; 95 (08) 820-825
- 25 Briceño CA, Fuller ML, Bradley EA, Nelson CC. Assessment of the Abbreviated National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ 9) in blepharoptosis and dermatochalasis. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2016; 79 (04) 226-228
- 26 Bruce-Brand RA, Baker JF, Byrne DP, Hogan NA, McCarthy T. Assessment of the quality and content of information on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the internet. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (06) 1095-1100
- 27 Nicholl H, Tracey C, Begley T, King C, Lynch AM. Internet use by parents of children with rare conditions: findings from a study on parents' web information needs. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (02) e51