Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2022; 10(02): 57-68
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744135
Original Research Article

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure

Lars G. Svensson 
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
2   The Aorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Brad F. Rosinski
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Nicholas J. Tucker 
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
A. Marc Gillinov
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran 
3   Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Eric E. Roselli
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
2   The Aorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Douglas R. Johnston
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
2   The Aorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Milind Y. Desai
2   The Aorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
4   Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Brian P. Griffin
2   The Aorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
4   Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Eugene H. Blackstone 
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
2   The Aorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
3   Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was funded in part by the Marty and Michelle Weinberg and Family Fund, The Friends of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the Delos M. Cosgrove, MD, Chair for Heart Disease Research, the Dana A. Hamel Family Foundation, the Gus P. Karos Registry Fund, the David Whitmire Hearst, Jr. Foundation, the Judith Dion Pyle Endowed Chair in Heart Valve Research, the Stephens Family Endowed Chair in Cardiothoracic Surgery, the Haslam Family Endowed Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine, the John and Rosemary Brown Endowed Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine, and the Drs. Sidney and Becca Fleischer Heart and Vascular Education Chair.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background A bioprosthesis- or mechanical-prosthesis–containing polyester graft (composite graft) is standard surgical management for aortic root aneurysms (Bentall procedure), but particularly in the young patient in whom a bioprosthesis is likely to deteriorate and a mechanical prosthesis mandates life-long anticoagulation, valve-sparing procedures have been devised. One such procedure involves reimplantation of the native aortic valve in the polyester graft. With focus on selecting the optimum procedure for young relatively asymptomatic patients, we compared outcomes of reimplantation of the aortic valve versus the Bentall procedure and identified factors influencing outcomes.

Methods From January 2000 to January 2017, 643 adults age ≤ 70 with tricuspid aortic valves underwent elective aortic root replacement with either reimplantation (n = 448/70%) or a composite valve graft (Bentall) procedure (n = 195/30%). Outcomes were compared in 100 propensity-matched pairs.

Results Patients with fewer symptoms, less aortic regurgitation (AR), higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and smaller cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio had a higher likelihood of valve repair with reimplantation (all p < 0.02) versus receiving a Bentall procedure. Operative mortality was 0.16% (reimplantation, 1/448, 0.22%; Bentall 0/195, 0%). After reimplantation, 8-year freedom from severe AR was 95% and 10-year freedom from reintervention was 98%. Ten-year survival was 95%. Higher preoperative AR grade (p < 0.0001) but not larger root diameter (p = 0.3) was associated with higher grade of late regurgitation after a reimplantation procedure. Among propensity-matched patients, reimplantation compared with a Bentall was associated with similar 10-year survival (89% vs. 94%), but more late AR (8-year freedom from severe AR: 93% vs. 99.9%) and greater early reduction in, but similar late, left ventricular mass (104 vs. 105 g•m–2 at 8 years).

Conclusion Excellent aortic valve reimplantation results versus Bentall lead us to recommend reimplantation more often in patients who present with even moderately severe or severe AR and significantly enlarged aortic roots.

Keywords

aortic valve - aortic root - bioprosthesis - surgery

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 18 September 2020

Accepted: 09 September 2021

Article published online:
07 August 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA. et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Society for Vascular Medicine. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55 (14) e27-e129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hiratzka LF, Creager MA, Isselbacher EM. et al. Surgery for aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves: a statement of clarification from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67 (06) 724-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Svensson LG, Pillai ST, Rajeswaran J. et al. Long-term survival, valve durability, and reoperation for 4 aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151 (03) 764-774.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Svensson LG. Sizing for modified David's reimplantation procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76 (05) 1751-1753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Coselli JS, Weldon SA, Preventza O, de la Cruz KI, LeMaire SA. Valve-sparing versus composite root replacement procedures in patients with Marfan syndrome. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 6 (06) 692-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Miller DC. Reprint of: Rationale and results of the Stanford modification of the David V reimplantation technique for valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149 (2, Suppl): S18-S20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Price J, Magruder JT, Young A. et al. Long-term outcomes of aortic root operations for Marfan syndrome: a comparison of Bentall versus aortic valve-sparing procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151 (02) 330-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Svensson LG, Blackstone EH, Alsalihi M. et al. Midterm results of David reimplantation in patients with connective tissue disorder. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95 (02) 555-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103 (04) 617-621 , discussion 622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 David TE, David CM, Feindel CM, Manlhiot C. Reimplantation of the aortic valve at 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153 (02) 232-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Svensson LG, Cooper M, Batizy LH, Nowicki ER. Simplified David reimplantation with reduction of anular size and creation of artificial sinuses. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89 (05) 1443-1447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Svensson LG, Batizy LH, Blackstone EH. et al. Results of matching valve and root repair to aortic valve and root pathology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142 (06) 1491-8.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Doherty JU, Kort S, Mehran R, Schoenhagen P, Soman P. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging in valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70 (13) 1647-1672
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jacobs JP, Yohe C, Krantz J, Blackstone EH. Documentation of vital status in the United States of America. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154 (02) 644-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rajeswaran J, Blackstone EH. Identifying risk factors: challenges of separating signal from noise. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153 (05) 1136-1138
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Rubin DB. Some explicit imputation models with univariate Yi and covariates. In: Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987: 166-167
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Ishwaran H, Kogalur UB. Random forests for survival, regression and classification (RF-SRC), R package version 1.4.0.16. 2014 Accessed October 4, 2021 at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForestSRC/index.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Friedman JH. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 2001; 29: 1189-1202
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Tang F, Ishwaran H. Random forest missing data algorithms. Stat Anal Data Min 2017; 10 (06) 363-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rajeswaran J, Blackstone EH. A multiphase non-linear mixed effects model: an application to spirometry after lung transplantation. Stat Methods Med Res 2017; 26 (01) 21-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Blackstone EH, Naftel DC, Turner Jr ME. The decomposition of time-varying hazard into phases, each incorporating a separate stream of concomitant information. J Am Stat Assoc 1986; 81: 615-624
    Google Scholar
  • 22 de Meester C, Gerber BL, Vancraeynest D. et al. Do guideline-based indications result in an outcome penalty for patients with severe aortic regurgitation?. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 12 (11 Pt 1): 2126-2138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG. et al. Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and a dilated ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10 (06) e006249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Zeeshan A, Idrees JJ, Johnston DR. et al. Durability of aortic valve cusp repair with and without annular support. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105 (03) 739-748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wojnarski CM, Svensson LG, Roselli EE. et al. Aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valve-associated aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100 (05) 1666-1673 , discussion 1673–1674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar