Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743416
Geographic Trends in the Ophthalmology Residency Match: Influence of Program and Applicant Characteristics
Funding None.Abstract
Introduction The ophthalmology residency match remains competitive. Several prior studies have examined various factors that contribute to a successful match into an ophthalmology residency program; however, the role of geographic location in the ophthalmology residency match process is unclear. The purpose of our study was to evaluate geographic trends in the ophthalmology residency match and to determine whether geographic trends vary based on program level factors such as program rank or funding source and/or applicant factors such as year of training, gender, and medical degree earned. Specifically, we assessed associations with residents training at the residency program affiliated with their medical school and/or within the same geographic region as their medical school, using data obtained through publicly available sources and residency program surveys.
Methods We used the American Medical Association's Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database database to identify accredited ophthalmology residency programs. Residency program Web sites and email inquiries were used to collect demographic and geographic information for residents in the graduating classes of 2021 to 2023. Statistical analysis included χ2 testing and multivariate logistic regression.
Results In total, 1,378 residents were included from 110 ophthalmology residency programs and 218 medical schools. Residents who matched at the residency program affiliated with their medical school (18%) were evenly distributed among the Midwest, Northeast, South, and West regions (p = 0.2236). Residency programs in the West (31.7%) matched fewer regional medical students compared with programs in the South (61.2%), Midwest (57.4%), and Northeast (58.4%) (p < 0.0001). Attending a publicly funded medical school was associated with higher odds of matching into a regional residency program (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.90; p = 0.0001) and attending a privately funded medical school was associated with higher odds of matching into a top-ranked residency program (OR, 1.53, 95% CI, 1.34–1.82; p = 0.0002).
Conclusions The majority of current ophthalmology residents trained at programs in the same geographic region as their medical schools, with nearly 20% of residents training at their medical school-affiliated program. Geographic differences in match results were observed based on resident gender, medical school characteristics, and residency program region.
Publication History
Received: 19 November 2021
Accepted: 20 January 2022
Article published online:
10 March 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Ophthalmology Residency Match Summary Report. Accessed June 1, 2021 at: https://aupo.org/news/2021-04/2021-ophthalmology-residency-match-summary-report.
- 2 Moore DB. Not a cheap investment: estimating the cost of the 2017 to 2018 ophthalmology residency match to the applicant and program. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10 (01) e158-e162
- 3 Grubbs Jr JR, Mian SI. Advising students interested in ophthalmology: a summary of the evidence. Ophthalmology 2016; 123 (07) 1406-1410
- 4 Behunin N, Hill C, Lotpifour M, Scott IU. The ophthalmology residency program director survey: applicant qualities affecting the invitation to interview and rank position. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58 (08) 5052-5052
- 5 Falcone JL. Home-field advantage: the role of selection bias in the general surgery national residency matching program. J Surg Educ 2013; 70 (04) 461-465
- 6 Hashmi A, Khan FA, Policherla R, Hamamdjian CS, Al-Mufarrej F. No place like home: is there selection bias in plastic surgery residency match process?. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (01) e1207
- 7 Cox RM, Sobel AD, Biercevicz A, Eberson CP, Mulcahey MK. Geographic trends in the orthopedic surgery residency match. J Grad Med Educ 2018; 10 (04) 423-428
- 8 Johnson AP, Svider PF, Folbe AJ. et al. An evaluation of geographic trends in the otolaryngology residency match: home is where the heart is. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141 (05) 424-428
- 9 FREIDA Residency Program Database. Accessed June 23, 2021 at: https://freida.ama-assn.org/search/list?spec=42956&page=1
- 10 Schools BM. (Research) Ranked in 2022—US News Rankings. Accessed July 15, 2021 at: https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-medical-schools/research-rankings.
- 11 Smith BB, Long TR, Tooley AA, Doherty JA, Billings HA, Dozois EJ. Impact of doximity residency navigator on graduate medical education recruitment. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2018; 2 (02) 113-118
- 12 Doximity Residency Navigator—Ophthalmology Programs. Doximity. . Accessed May 9, 2021 at: https://www.doximity.com/residency/specialties/6432ac93-b82a-4829-b5c5-f7a07811afbb-ophthalmology
- 13 United States, Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1993 Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; 1993
- 14 Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC. et al. The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (03) 281-287
- 15 Silvestre J, Lin IC, Serletti JM, Chang B. Geographic trends in the plastic surgery match. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (02) 270-274
- 16 Residency Match Basics for Ophthalmology. Accessed July 1, 2021 at: https://www.aao.org/medical-students/residency-match-basics
- 17 Siatkowski RM, Mian SI, Culican SM. et al; Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. Probability of success in the ophthalmology residency match: three-year outcomes analysis of San Francisco matching program data. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10 (01) e150-e157
- 18 Loh AR, Joseph D, Keenan JD, Lietman TM, Naseri A. Predictors of matching in an ophthalmology residency program. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (04) 865-870
- 19 The Match Report Archives. Accessed July 24, 2021 at: https://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/
- 20 Mian A, Kim D, Chen D, Ward WL. Medical student and resident burnout: a review of causes, effects, and prevention. J Fam Med Dis Prev 2018; 94 (04) 1-8
- 21 Goebert D, Thompson D, Takeshita J. et al. Depressive symptoms in medical students and residents: a multischool study. Acad Med 2009; 84 (02) 236-241
- 22 Goshtasbi K, Tsutsumi K, Merna C, Kuan EC, Haidar YM, Tjoa T. Does Medical School Geography and Ranking Influence Residency Match in Otolaryngology? [published online ahead of print, 2021 Jun 22]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2021; 34894211026482 DOI: 10.1177/00034894211026482.
- 23 Rajani R, Haghshenas V, Abalihi N, Tavakoli EM, Zelle BA. Geographic differences in sex and racial distributions among orthopaedic surgery residencies: programs in the south less likely to train women and minorities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2019; 3 (02) e004
- 24 Yousuf SJ, Kwagyan J, Jones LS. Applicants' choice of an ophthalmology residency program. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (02) 423-427
- 25 Phitayakorn R, Macklin EA, Goldsmith J, Weinstein DF. Applicants' self-reported priorities in selecting a residency program. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 (01) 21-26
- 26 Aagaard EM, Julian K, Dedier J, Soloman I, Tillisch J, Pérez-Stable EJ. Factors affecting medical students' selection of an internal medicine residency program. J Natl Med Assoc 2005; 97 (09) 1264-1270
- 27 Kroin E, Garbarski D, Shimomura A, Romano J, Schiff A, Wu K. Gender differences in program factors important to applicants when evaluating orthopaedic surgery residency programs. J Grad Med Educ 2019; 11 (05) 565-569
- 28 Gebhard GM, Hauser LJ, Dally MJ, Weitzenkamp DA, Cabrera-Muffly C. Do otolaryngology residency applicants relocate for training?. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (04) 829-833
- 29 Narang J, Morgan F, Eversman A. et al. Trends in geographic and home program preferences in the dermatology residency match: A retrospective cohort analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022; 86 (03) 645-647 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.02.011.
- 30 Zeldow PB, Preston RC, Daugherty SR. The decision to enter a medical specialty: timing and stability. Med Educ 1992; 26 (04) 327-332
- 31 McManus C. Medical careers: stories of a life. Med Educ 1997; 31 (Suppl. 01) 31-35
- 32 Watmough S, Taylor D, Ryland I. Using questionnaires to determine whether medical graduates' career choice is determined by undergraduate or postgraduate experiences. Med Teach 2007; 29 (08) 830-832
- 33 Yang Y, Li J, Wu X. et al. Factors influencing subspecialty choice among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (03) e022097
- 34 Brown C. A qualitative study of medical school choice in the UK. Med Teach 2007; 29 (01) 27-32
- 35 Wouters A, Croiset G, Schripsema NR. et al. Students' approaches to medical school choice: relationship with students' characteristics and motivation. Int J Med Educ 2017; 8: 217-226
- 36 Where Do Physicians Train? Investigating Public And Private Institutional Pipelines. Accessed July 24, 2021 at: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1356
- 37 Rasendran C, Rahman S, Younis U. et al. The impact of virtual interviews on the geographic distribution of ophthalmology match results in the 2020–2021 Cycle. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13: e242 –e246
- 38 Shah SM, Barkmeier AJ, Dalvin LA, Tooley AA. Applicant perceptions regarding the 2020 to 2021 virtual ophthalmology residency interview and match season. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13: e144 –e150
- 39 Ascione FJ. In pursuit of prestige: the folly of the US News and World Report survey. Am J Pharm Educ 2012; 76 (06) 103
- 40 Rolston AM, Hartley SE, Khandelwal S. et al. Effect of Doximity residency rankings on residency applicants' program choices. West J Emerg Med 2015; 16 (06) 889-893
- 41 Glener AD, Lebhar M, Hernandez JA. et al. Location, location, location: the geographic impact of medical school on the plastic surgery match. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (04) e3549