Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13(01): 270-286
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743238
Review Article

Barriers and Benefits of Information Communication Technologies Used by Health Care Aides

Hector Perez 
1   School of Publich Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (ON), Canada
,
Noelannah Neubauer 
1   School of Publich Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (ON), Canada
,
Samantha Marshall 
1   School of Publich Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (ON), Canada
,
Serrina Philip 
1   School of Publich Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (ON), Canada
,
Antonio Miguel-Cruz 
1   School of Publich Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (ON), Canada
2   Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton (AB), Canada
3   Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton (AB), Canada
,
Lili Liu 
1   School of Publich Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (ON), Canada
› Author Affiliations Funding This project is supported by the Centre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation (CABHI) and Alberta Innovates grant number G2019000525 AICE-ABH, received by L.L. as principal investigator.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Although information and communication technologies (ICT) are becoming more common among health care providers, there is little evidence on how ICT can support health care aides. Health care aides, also known as personal care workers, are unlicensed service providers who encompass the second largest workforce, next to nurses, that provide care to older adults in Canada.

Objective The purpose of this literature review is to examine the range and extent of barriers and benefits of ICT used by health care workers to manage and coordinate the care-delivery workflow for their clients.

Methods We conducted a literature review to examine the range and extent of ICT used by health care aides to manage and coordinate their care delivery, workflow, and activities. We identified 8,958 studies of which 40 were included for descriptive analyses.

Results We distinguished the following five different purposes for the use and implementation of ICT by health care aides: (1) improve everyday work, (2) access electronic health records for home care, (3) facilitate client assessment and care planning, (4) enhance communication, and (5) provide care remotely. We identified 128 barriers and 130 benefits related to adopting ICT. Most of the barriers referred to incomplete hardware and software features, time-consuming ICT adoption, heavy or increased workloads, perceived lack of usefulness of ICT, cost or budget restrictions, security and privacy concerns, and lack of integration with technologies. The benefits for health care aides' adoption of ICT were improvements in communication, support to workflows and processes, improvements in resource planning and health care aides' services, and improvements in access to information and documentation.

Conclusion Health care aides are an essential part of the health care system. They provide one-on-one care to their clients in everyday tasks. Despite the scarce information related to health care aides, we identified many benefits of ICT adoption.

Keywords

information technology - delivery of health care - health personnel - workflow - aged

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Data extraction, analysis, and synthesis were performed by H.P., N.N., and S.M. The first draft of the manuscript was written by H.P., N.N., S.M., and S.P., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. L.L., A.M.C., and N.N. read and approved the final manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 07 September 2021

Accepted: 03 January 2022

Article published online:
09 March 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization. Ageing and health. Accessed May 3, 2021 at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chiang KF, Wang HH. Nurses' experiences of using a smart mobile device application to assist home care for patients with chronic disease: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 2016; 25 (13,14): 2008-2017
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Alzheimer Society of Canada. Report summary prevalence and monetary costs of dementia in Canada (2016): a report by the Alzheimer Society of Canada. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can 2016; 36 (10) 231-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Personal support worker. Accessed March 20, 2021 at: https://settlement.org/alternative-jobs/nurse/personal-support-worker/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Personal Support Worker HQ. Personal support worker?. Accessed January 21, 2022 at: https://www.centennialcollege.ca/programs-courses/full-time/personal-support-worker/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Online ONIP. Personal support worker (PSW) in Canada. Accessed March 2, 2021 at: http://www.onip.ca/personal-support-worker/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Saari M, Xiao S, Rowe A. et al. The role of unregulated care providers in home care: a scoping review. J Nurs Manag 2018; 26 (07) 782-794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hewko SJ, Cooper SL, Huynh H. et al. Invisible no more: a scoping review of the health care aide workforce literature. BMC Nurs 2015; 14 (01) 38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Berta W, Laporte A, Deber R, Baumann A, Gamble B. The evolving role of health care aides in the long-term care and home and community care sectors in Canada. Hum Resour Health 2013; 11 (01) 25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lilly M. Medical versus social work-places: constructing and compensating the personal support worker across health care settings in Ontario, Canada. Gend Place Cult 2008; 15 (03) 285-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Arain MA, Deutschlander S, Charland P. Are healthcare aides underused in long-term care? A cross-sectional study on continuing care facilities in Canada. BMJ Open 2017; 7 (05) e015521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Estabrooks CA, Squires JE, Carleton HL, Cummings GG, Norton PG. Who is looking after mom and dad? Unregulated workers in Canadian long-term care homes. Can J Aging 2015; 34 (01) 47-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 White DE, Jackson K, Besner J, Norris JM. The examination of nursing work through a role accountability framework. J Nurs Manag 2015; 23 (05) 604-612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Franzosa E, Tsui EK, Baron S. Home health aides' perceptions of quality care: goals, challenges, and implications for a rapidly changing industry. New Solut 2018; 27 (04) 629-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Saari M, Patterson E, Killackey T, Raffaghello J, Rowe A, Tourangeau AE. Home-based care: barriers and facilitators to expanded personal support worker roles in Ontario, Canada. Home Health Care Serv Q 2017; 36 (3,4): 127-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kroezen M, Schäfer W, Sermeus W, Hansen J, Batenburg R. Healthcare assistants in EU member states: an overview. Health Policy 2018; 122 (10) 1109-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Janet L, Jennifer S, Alvin Y. Ontario personal support workers in home and community care: CRNCC/PSNO survey results. Accessed March 20, 2021 at: https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/crncc/knowledge/infocus/factsheets/InFocus-OntarioPSWsinHomeandCommunityCare.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Booi L, Sixsmith J, Chaudhury H, O'Connor D, Young M, Sixsmith A. 'I wouldn't choose this work again': perspectives and experiences of care aides in long-term residential care. J Adv Nurs 2021; 77 (09) 3842-3852
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kelly C, Bourgeault IL. The personal support worker program standard in Ontario: an alternative to self-regulation?. Healthc Policy 2015; 11 (02) 20-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 National Alliance for Caregiving. Caregiving in the U.S.. 2020 . Accessed January 21, 2022 at: https://www.caregiving.org/caregiving-in-the-us-2020/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Statistics Canada. Care counts: care receivers in Canada,. 2018 . Accessed February 1, 2021 at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2020002-eng.htm
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Government of Canada. Government of Canada announces funding to train 4,000 personal support worker interns, support sector. Accessed May 18, 2021 at: https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/news/2020/12/government-of-canada-announces-funding-to-train-4000-personal-support-worker-interns-support-sector.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 CBC News. Ontario's PSW shortage is impacting people living with disabilities in Waterloo region. Accessed May 18, 2021 at: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/psw-shortage-ontario-waterloo-region-impacts-1.5953472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Muir T. Measuring social protection for long-term care. Accessed January 21, 2022 at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/measuring-social-protection-for-long-term-care_a411500a-en
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 CIHI. Canada's seniors population outlook: uncharted territory. Accessed May 18, 2021 at: https://www.cihi.ca/en/infographic-canadas-seniors-population-outlook-uncharted-territory
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs PD. World population prospects 2019: highlights. Accessed January 21, 2022 at: https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Brophy JT, Keith MM, Hurley M, McArthur JE. Sacrificed: Ontario healthcare workers in the time of COVID-19. New Solut 2021; 30 (04) 267-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Drennan VM, Ross F. Global nurse shortages-the facts, the impact and action for change. Br Med Bull 2019; 130 (01) 25-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Estabrooks CA, Straus SE, Flood CM. et al. Restoring trust: COVID-19 and the future of long-term care in Canada. Facets 2020; 5 (01) 651-691
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Baker SB, Xiang W, Atkinson I. Internet of things for smart healthcare: technologies, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Access 2017; 5: 26521-26544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tyagi RK, Cook L, Olson J, Belohlav J. Healthcare technologies, quality improvement programs and hospital organizational culture in Canadian hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 (01) 413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Boric-Lubecke O, Gao X, Yavari E, Baboli M, Singh A, Lubecke VM. E-healthcare: Remote monitoring, privacy, and security. In: 2014 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS2014). IEEE; 2014:1–3; Tampa, FL
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Report: 2020 national survey of Canadian nurses: use of digital health technology in practice. Accessed January 21, 2022 at: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/3812-2020-national-survey-of-canadian-nurses-use-of-digital-health-technology-in-practice/view-document?Itemid=0
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Forum on Aging, Disability, and Independence; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Institute of Medicine; National Research Council. The Future of Home Health Care: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Katalinic O, Young A, Doolan D. Case study: the interact home telehealth project. J Telemed Telecare 2013; 19 (07) 418-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lindeman DA, Kim KK, Gladstone C, Apesoa-Varano EC. Technology and caregiving: emerging interventions and directions for research. Gerontologist 2020; 60 (Suppl. 01) S41-S49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sterling MR, Dell N, Tseng E. et al. Home care workers caring for adults with heart failure need better access to training and technology: a role for implementation science. J Clin Transl Sci 2020; 4 (03) 224-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 King S, Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis I. Using simulations to integrate technology into health care aides' workflow. Int J Adv Corp Learn 2013; 6 (02) 28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Wildevuur SE, Simonse LW. Information and communication technology-enabled person-centered care for the “big five” chronic conditions: scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (03) e77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Petersen HV, Foged S, Madsen AL, Andersen O, Nørholm V. Nurses' perception of how an e-message system influences cross-sectoral communication: a qualitative study. J Nurs Manag 2018; 26 (05) 509-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Aslani N, Ahmadi M, Samadbeik M. A systematic review of the attributes of electronic personal health Records for Patients with multiple sclerosis. Health Technol (Berl) 2020; 10 (03) 587-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Steele Gray C, Barnsley J, Gagnon D. et al. Using information communication technology in models of integrated community-based primary health care: learning from the iCOACH case studies. Implement Sci 2018; 13 (01) 87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sterling MR, Silva AF, Leung PBK. et al. “It's like they forget that the word 'health' is in 'home health aide'”: understanding the perspectives of home care workers who care for adults with heart failure. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7 (23) e010134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Falconer E, Kho D, Docherty JP. Use of technology for care coordination initiatives for patients with mental health issues: a systematic literature review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2018; 14: 2337-2349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Rahimi B, Nadri H, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Timpka T. A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (03) 604-634
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Alhuwail D, Koru G. Identifying home care clinicians' information needs for managing fall risks. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (02) 211-226
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13 (01) 48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8 (01) 19-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Robinson KA, Saldanha IJ, McKoy NA. Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64 (12) 1325-1330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Belur J, Tompson L, Thornton A, Simon M. Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: exploring variation in coder decision-making. Sociol Methods Res 2021; 50 (02) 837-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Brown RN, Ruggiano N, Page TF. et al. CareHeroes web and android apps for dementia caregivers. Res Gerontol Nurs 2016; 9 (04) 193-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Kaunda-Khangamwa BN, Steinhardt LC, Rowe AK. et al. The effect of mobile phone text message reminders on health workers' adherence to case management guidelines for malaria and other diseases in Malawi: lessons from qualitative data from a cluster-randomized trial. Malar J 2018; 17 (01) 481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Gars U, Skov H. The TECS model leads to active use of technology in home care. Nord J Nurs Res 2017; 37 (01) 51-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Stroulia E, Nikolaidisa I, Liua L, King S, Lessard L. Home care and technology: a case study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 182: 142-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Sassen B, Kok G, Schepers J, Vanhees L. Supporting health care professionals to improve the processes of shared decision making and self-management in a web-based intervention: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16 (10) e211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Nilsson L, Fagerström C. Decision-makers and mediators in a home healthcare digitisation process: nurses' experiences of implementation and use of a decision support system. Contemp Nurse 2018; 54 (4,5): 511-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Gund A, Sjöqvist BA, Wigert H, Hentz E, Lindecrantz K, Bry K. A randomized controlled study about the use of eHealth in the home health care of premature infants. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13 (01) 22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Andersen GR, Bendal S, Westgaard RH. Work demands and health consequences of organizational and technological measures introduced to enhance the quality of home care services–a subgroup analysis. Appl Ergon 2015; 51: 172-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Alhuwail D, Koru G. Leveraging health information technology for fall-risk management in home care: a qualitative exploration of clinicians' perspectives. Home Health Care Manage Pract 2016; 28 (04) 241-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Danilovich MK, Diaz L, Saberbein G, Healey WE, Huber G, Corcos DM. Design and development of a mobile exercise application for home care aides and older adult medicaid home and community-based clients. Home Health Care Serv Q 2017; 36 (3-4): 196-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Lexis M, Everink I, Van Der Heide L, Spreeuwenberg M, Willems C, De Witte L. Activity monitoring technology to support homecare delivery to frail and psychogeriatric elderly persons living at home alone. Technol Disabil 2013; 25 (03) 189-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Westra BL, Oancea C, Savik K, Marek KD. The feasibility of integrating the Omaha system data across home care agencies and vendors. Comput Inform Nurs 2010; 28 (03) 162-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Yang Y, Bass EJ, Bowles KH, Sockolow PS. Impact of home care admission nurses' goals on electronic health record documentation strategies at the point of care. Comput Inform Nurs 2019; 37 (01) 39-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Tapper L, Quinn H, Kerry J, Brown KG. Introducing handheld computers into home care. Can Nurse 2012; 108 (01) 28-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Sockolow PS, Bowles KH, Adelsberger MC, Chittams JL, Liao C. Impact of homecare electronic health record on timeliness of clinical documentation, reimbursement, and patient outcomes. Appl Clin Inform 2014; 5 (02) 445-462
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Han S, Juell-Skielse G, Smedberg Å, Aasi P, Nilsson AG. Benefits of mobile reporting systems in social home care: the case of seven Swedish municipalities. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2014; 30 (04) 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Gjevjon ER, Hellesø R. The quality of home care nurses' documentation in new electronic patient records. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19 (1,2): 100-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Bercovitz A, Sengupta M, Jamison P. Electronic medical record adoption and use in home health and hospice. NCHS Data Brief 2010; (45) 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 De Vliegher K, Paquay L, Vernieuwe S, Van Gansbeke H. The experience of home nurses with an electronic nursing health record. Int Nurs Rev 2010; 57 (04) 508-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Alhuwail D, Koru G, Mills ME. Supporting the information domains of fall-risk management in home care via health information technology. Home Health Care Serv Q 2016; 35 (3,4): 155-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Vasalampi A. Adoption and use of a mobile system at home care. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 242: 1042-1046
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Santi SM, Hinton S, Berg K, Stolee P. Bridging the information divide: health information sharing in home care. Can J Nurs Res 2013; 45 (01) 16-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Göransson C, Eriksson I, Ziegert K. et al. Testing an app for reporting health concerns-Experiences from older people and home care nurses. Int J Older People Nurs 2018; 13 (02) e12181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Dean KM, Hatfield LA, Jena AB. et al. Preliminary data on a care coordination program for home care recipients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016; 64 (09) 1900-1903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Stutzel MC, Filippo MP, Sztajnberg A. et al. Multi-part quality evaluation of a customized mobile application for monitoring elderly patients with functional loss and helping caregivers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19 (01) 1-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Farsjø C, Kluge A, Moen A. Using a tablet application about nutrition in home care-Experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals. Health Soc Care Community 2019; 27 (03) 683-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Bastide R, Bardy P, Borrel B. et al. Plas'O'Soins: a software platform for modeling, planning and monitoring homecare activities. IRBM 2014; 35 (02) 82-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Arbaje AI, Hughes A, Werner N. et al. Information management goals and process failures during home visits for middle-aged and older adults receiving skilled home healthcare services after hospital discharge: a multisite, qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf 2019; 28 (02) 111-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Dowding DW, Russell D, Onorato N, Merrill JA. Technology solutions to support care continuity in home care: a focus group study. J Healthc Qual 2018; 40 (04) 236-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Lyngstad M, Hellesø R. Electronic communication experiences of home health care nurses and general practitioners: a cross-sectional study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2014; 201: 388-394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Lyngstad M, Grimsmo A, Hofoss D, Hellesø R. Home care nurses' experiences with using electronic messaging in their communication with general practitioners. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23 (23,24): 3424-3433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Gentles SJ, Lokker C, McKibbon KA. Health information technology to facilitate communication involving health care providers, caregivers, and pediatric patients: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12 (02) e22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Bossen C, Christensen LR, Grönvall E, Vestergaard LS. CareCoor: augmenting the coordination of cooperative home care work. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82 (05) e189-e199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Mangwi Ayiasi R, Kolsteren P, Batwala V, Criel B, Orach CG. Effect of village health team home visits and mobile phone consultations on maternal and newborn care practices in Masindi and Kiryandongo, Uganda: a community-intervention trial. PLoS One 2016; 11 (04) e0153051
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Little A, Medhanyie A, Yebyo H, Spigt M, Dinant GJ, Blanco R. Meeting community health worker needs for maternal health care service delivery using appropriate mobile technologies in Ethiopia. PLoS One 2013; 8 (10) e77563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Lluch M. Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies-a literature review. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80 (12) 849-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 de Souza CHA, Morbeck RA, Steinman M. et al. Barriers and benefits in telemedicine arising between a high-technology hospital service provider and remote public healthcare units: a qualitative study in Brazil. Telemed J E Health 2017; 23 (06) 527-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Alaboudi A, Atkins A, Sharp B, Balkhair A, Alzahrani M, Sunbul T. Barriers and challenges in adopting Saudi telemedicine network: the perceptions of decision makers of healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health 2016; 9 (06) 725-733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Kaye R, Kokia E, Shalev V, Idar D, Chinitz D. Barriers and success factors in health information technology: a practitioner's perspective. J Manag Mark Healthc 2010; 3 (02) 163-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Irinoye OO, Ayandiran EO, Fakunle I, Mtshali N. Nurses' perception and barriers to use of information communication technology in a teaching hospital in Nigeria. Comput Inform Nurs 2013; 31 (08) 394-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Schoen J, Mallett JW, Grossman-Kahn R, Brentani A, Kaselitz E, Heisler M. Perspectives and experiences of community health workers in Brazilian primary care centers using m-health tools in home visits with community members. Hum Resour Health 2017; 15 (01) 71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Eley R, Fallon T, Soar J, Buikstra E, Hegney D. Barriers to use of information and computer technology by Australia's nurses: a national survey. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18 (08) 1151-1158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Ramsey A, Lord S, Torrey J, Marsch L, Lardiere M. Paving the way to successful implementation: identifying key barriers to use of technology-based therapeutic tools for behavioral health care. J Behav Health Serv Res 2016; 43 (01) 54-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 O' Connor Y, O' Connor S, Heavin C, Gallagher J, O' Donoghue J. Sociocultural and technological barriers across all phases of implementation for mobile health in developing countries. In: Al-Jumeily D, Hissain A, Mallucci C, Oliver C. eds. Applied Computing in Medicine and Health. Waltham, MA: Elsevier; 2016: 212-230
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Shah SGS, Robinson I. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23 (01) 131-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Hassan AYI. Challenges and recommendations for the deployment of information and communication technology solutions for informal caregivers: scoping review. JMIR Aging 2020; 3 (02) e20310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Omboni S, Caserini M, Coronetti C. Telemedicine and M-health in hypertension management: technologies, applications and clinical evidence. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2016; 23 (03) 187-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Braun R, Catalani C, Wimbush J, Israelski D. Community health workers and mobile technology: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 2013; 8 (06) e65772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Early J, Gonzalez C, Gordon-Dseagu V, Robles-Calderon L. Use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies and interventions among community health workers globally: a scoping review. Health Promot Pract 2019; 20 (06) 805-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Thakkar M, Davis DC. Risks, barriers, and benefits of EHR systems: a comparative study based on size of hospital. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2006; 3: 5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Lindberg B, Nilsson C, Zotterman D, Söderberg S, Skär L. Using information and communication technology in home care for communication between patients, family members, and healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Int J Telemed Appl 2013; 2013: 461829
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Choukou MA, Maddahi A, Polyvyana A, Monnin C. Digital health technology for Indigenous older adults: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform 2021; 148: 104408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Koo BM, Vizer LM. Examining mobile technologies to support older adults with dementia through the lens of personhood and human needs: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7 (11) e15122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Brown P, Oliver E, Dening KH. Increasing need for telehealth services for families affected by dementia as a result of Covid-19. J Community Nurs 2020; 34 (05) 59-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B. et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (06) 957-962
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Alamoodi AH, Garfan S, Zaidan BB. et al. A systematic review into the assessment of medical apps: motivations, challenges, recommendations and methodological aspect. Health Technol (Berl) 2020; 10 (05) 1045-1061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Abelson JS, Kaufman E, Symer M, Peters A, Charlson M, Yeo H. Barriers and benefits to using mobile health technology after operation: a qualitative study. Surgery 2017; 162 (03) 605-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG. et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (16) 1628-1638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Bandini J, Rollison J, Feistel K, Whitaker L, Bialas A, Etchegaray J. Home care aide safety concerns and job challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Solut 2021; 31 (01) 20-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Yao W, Chu C-H, Li Z. The adoption and implementation of RFID technologies in healthcare: a literature review. J Med Syst 2012; 36 (06) 3507-3525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 24 (01) 4-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Tieu L, Sarkar U, Schillinger D. et al. Barriers and facilitators to online portal use among patients and caregivers in a safety net health care system: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (12) e275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Venkatesh M, Davis D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manage Inf Syst Q 2003; 27 (03) 425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q 1989; 13 (03) 319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000; 46 (02) 186-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Tavares J, Goulão A, Oliveira T. Electronic health record portals adoption: empirical model based on UTAUT2. Inform Health Soc Care 2018; 43 (02) 109-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Vanneste D, Vermeulen B, Declercq A. Healthcare professionals' acceptance of BelRAI, a web-based system enabling person-centred recording and data sharing across care settings with interRAI instruments: a UTAUT analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13 (01) 129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 An J-Y, Hayman LL, Panniers T, Carty B. Theory development in nursing and healthcare informatics: a model explaining and predicting information and communication technology acceptance by healthcare consumers. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2007; 30 (03) E37-E49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Jimenez G, Spinazze P, Matchar D. et al. Digital health competencies for primary healthcare professionals: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform 2020; 143: 104260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Tsekleves E, Darby A, Whicher A, Swiatek P. Co-designing design fictions: a new approach for debating and priming future healthcare technologies and services. Arch Des Res 2017; 30 (02) 5-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Aryana B, Brewster L, Nocera JA. Design for mobile mental health: an exploratory review. Health Technol (Berl) 2019; 9 (04) 401-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Holden RJ, Karanam YLP, Cavalcanti LH. et al. Health information management practices in informal caregiving: an artifacts analysis and implications for IT design. Int J Med Inform 2018; 120: 31-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Afzal A, Stolee P, Heckman GA, Boscart VM, Sanyal C. The role of unregulated care providers in Canada-A scoping review. Int J Older People Nurs 2018; 13 (03) e12190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJM. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83 (04) 235-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Moloney J, Abbas R, Beecham S, Ahmad B, Richardson I. Challenges and Opportunities for Caregiving through Information and Communication Technology. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications; 2020: 329-336
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Innes A, Morgan D, Kosteniuk J. Dementia care in rural and remote settings: a systematic review of informal/family caregiving. Maturitas 2011; 68 (01) 34-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Benefield LE, Beck C. Reducing the distance in distance-caregiving by technology innovation. Clin Interv Aging 2007; 2 (02) 267-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Tassé MJ, Wagner JB, Kim M. Using technology and remote support services to promote independent living of adults with intellectual disability and related developmental disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2020; 33 (03) 640-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 129 Ikeda Y, Kobayakawa M, Nakao H, Iseki F, Matsushita H. Information Technology/Artificial Intelligence Innovations Needed for Better Quality of Life in Caregiving Homes. In: Health Informatics. Matsushita H. ed. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2021: 37-58
    Google Scholar
  • 130 Merkel S, Kucharski A. Participatory design in gerontechnology: a systematic literature review. Gerontologist 2019; 59 (01) e16-e25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Neumann-Podczaska A, Seostianin M, Madejczyk K. et al. An experimental education project for consultations of older adults during the pandemic and healthcare lockdown. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9 (04) 425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Tuijt R, Rait G, Frost R, Wilcock J, Manthorpe J, Walters K. Remote primary care consultations for people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of people living with dementia and their carers. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71 (709) e574-e582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Greenberg NE, Wallick A, Brown LM. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on community-dwelling caregivers and persons with dementia. Psychol Trauma 2020; 12 (S1): S220-S221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Shang J, Chastain AM, Perera UGE. et al. COVID-19 preparedness in US home health care agencies. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21 (07) 924-927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Egan K. Digital technology, health and well-being and the COVID-19 pandemic: it's time to call forward informal carers from the back of the queue. Semin Oncol Nurs 2020; 36 (06) 151088
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Goodman-Casanova JM, Dura-Perez E, Guzman-Parra J, Cuesta-Vargas A, Mayoral-Cleries F. Telehealth home support during COVID-19 confinement for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia: survey study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (05) e19434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar