CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indographics 2022; 01(01): 027-040
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742575
Review Article

Physical Principles of Elastography: A Primer for Radiologists

Sayantan Patra
1   Department of Radiology and Imaging, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Shabnam Bhandari Grover
1   Department of Radiology and Imaging, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
2   Department of Radiology and Imaging, Sharda School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Delhi NCR, India (current)
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Elastography is the noninvasive method of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of strain and elastic modulus distribution in soft tissues. In simpler terms, elastography is the science of measuring tissue stiffness, the deviation of which correlates with pathology of the tissue/organs being evaluated. Whereas, elasticity, refers to the property of solid matter to return to their original shape and size after removal of the deforming forces. In all forms of elastography, irrespective of the types of deforming forces or moduli, the deformation of tissue occurs in the form of shear deformation. The velocity of shear waves in the deformed tissue depends on its density and on the shear modulus. The direction of propagation of shear wave is perpendicular to the inciting mechanical or acoustic wave. The shear wave is then subsequently tracked using multiple tracking pulses, which measures tissue displacement in response to the passing shear wave. The calculated speed of the shear wave is then converted to conventional Young's modulus for the purpose of computing the tissue stiffness.

The currently used elastography techniques are static or quasi-static elastography and dynamic elastography. Strain elastography (a form of static or quasi-static elastography) is based on the principle of acquisition of radio-frequency (RF) signals before and after the application of a deforming force in the form of slight compression of tissue by a transducer. RF signals are compared between the pre-compression image data set and the post-compression image data set and correlated between the two data sets.

Dynamic elastography may be either ultrasound (US) based or magnetic resonance (MR) based. The types of dynamic US elastography are: acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI), transient elastography (TE), point shear wave elastography (pSWE), and shear wave elastography (SWE). ARFI uses a standard transducer to produce and propagate rapid bursts of long focused ultrasound pulses, also called as “push pulses” which cause tissue deformity, the propagation of which is tracked using radio-frequency echo tracking. In TE, a probe mounted on a vibrator is used to produce a small thump by piston like motion of transducer. The shear wave which arises from the edges of the transducer is tracked using high pulse repetition frequency tissue Doppler and computed using M-mode for display of quantitative parameters. Point shear wave, also known as quantitative ARFI, uses shear waves generated using transient tissue displacement caused by ARFI and are subsequently subjected to tracking by Doppler. Shear wave elastography is based on the principles of imaging shear wave speed. An acoustic radiation force impulse is transmitted along the acoustic axis to produce tissue displacement and deformation at points of acoustic axis. The generated shear wave is imaged using RF echo tracking over a grid of points, which is translated into a real time image. MR elastography is a dynamic technique and the basic principles of MR elastography are the same as other forms of dynamic elastography. MR elastography has limited utility in iron-overload states and in addition, due to the large amount of time required for acquisition, the technique is not suitable for unstable patients.

This review presents a simplified summary of the principles of elastography along with definition of the terms and the types of elastography which are currently available to radiologists for clinical application and concludes with a brief on the newer developments for the future.



Publication History

Article published online:
19 September 2023

© 2022. Indographics. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: A quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrasonic Imaging 1991; 13 (02) 111-134
  • 2 Garra BS. Elastography: history, principles, and technique comparison. Abdom Imaging 2015; Apr; 40 (04) 680-697 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0305-8. . PMID: 25637125
  • 3 Low G, Kruse SA, Lomas DJ. General review of magnetic resonance elastography. World J Radiol 2016; Jan 28; 8 (01) 59-72 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.59. . PMID: 26834944; PMCID: PMC4731349
  • 4 Elastography - Wikipedia [Internet]. En.wikipedia.org. 2021 [cited 22 December 2021]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastography
  • 5 Kemp WW, Roberts SK. FibroSca and transient elastograhy. Australian Family Physician 2013; 42 (07) 468-471
  • 6 Elert G. Elasticity [Internet]. The Physics Hypertextbook. 2021 [cited 22 December 2021]. Available from: https://physics.info/elasticity/
  • 7 Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J, Calliada F. et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall in der Medizin-European Journal of Ultrasound 2013; 34 (02) 169-184
  • 8 Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, Bojunga J, Correas JM, Gilja OH. et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall in der Medizin-European Journal of Ultrasound 2013; 34 (03) 238-253
  • 9 Mariappan Y, Glaser K, Ehman R. Magnetic resonance elastography: A review. Clinical Anatomy 2010; 23 (05) 497-511
  • 10 Ozturk A, Grajo J, Dhyani M, Anthony B, Samir A. Principles of ultrasound elastography. Abdominal Radiology 2018; 43 (04) 773-785
  • 11 Dawood M, Ibrahim N, Elsaeed H, Hegazy N. Diagnostic performance of sonoelastographic Tsukuba score and strain ratio in evaluation of breast masses. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2018; 49 (01) 265-271
  • 12 Franchi-Abella S, Elie C, Correas J. Ultrasound elastography: Advantages, limitations and artefacts of the different techniques from a study on a phantom. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 2013; 94 (05) 497-501
  • 13 Kwon S, Jeong M. Advances in ultrasound elasticity imaging. Biomedical Engineering Letters 2017; 7 (02) 71-79
  • 14 Castera L, Forns X, Alberti A. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography. Journal of Hepatology 2008; 48 (05) 835-847
  • 15 Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications. Theranostics 2017; Mar 7; 7 (05) 1303-1329 DOI: 10.7150/thno.18650. . PMID: 28435467; PMCID: PMC5399595
  • 16 Manduca A, Bayly PJ, Ehman RL. et al. MR elastography: Principles, guidelines, and terminology. Magn Reson Med 2021; 85: 2377-2390 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28627.