Home Monitoring Programs for Patients Testing Positive for SARS-CoV-2: An Integrative Literature Review

Abstract

Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic threatened to oversaturate hospitals worldwide, necessitating rapid patient discharge to preserve capacity for the most severe cases. This need, as well as the high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, led many hospitals to implement remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients in an effort to provide care that was safe and preserve scarce resources.

Objective The aim of this study is to provide an integrative review of peer-reviewed literature on different RPM programs that were implemented for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients including their strengths and challenges.

Methods A search was conducted for peer reviewed literature using PubMed, CINAHL, OVID, and Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed studies written in English or Spanish and published between 2019 and 2021 on RPM of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were considered. Information was extracted according to a qualitative content analysis method, informed by the Comparison of Mobile Patient Monitoring Systems Framework.

Results Of 57 retrieved articles, 10 publications were included. The sample sizes ranged from 75 to 48,290 and the monitoring length ranged from 7 to 30 days. Information regarding the comparison framework was summarized. Main strengths of using RPM for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients was participant acceptance, feasibility, safety, and resource conservation. Main limitations were the lack of information on patient data security measures, robust outcomes testing, and identification of the most effective biomarkers to track SARS-CoV-2 decompensation.

Conclusion Different RPM programs for SARS-CoV-2 were implemented, from sending home participants with a pulse oximeter and collecting readings via call to modifying existing mobile applications and sending holistic health questionnaires to participants. This review determined that RPM is beneficial to SARS-CoV-2 positive patients; however, its effectiveness can be improved by further research. Mainly, identifying what patient data are most effective at tracking SARS-CoV-2 decompensation by utilizing advanced technology already in the market.

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2 - COVID-19 - coronavirus - remote patient monitoring - telehealth - home quarantine - infectious disease - emergency medicine

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This review did not require human subjects research approval. However, the studies reviewed obtained human subjects research approval.

Publication History

Received: 13 September 2021

Accepted: 27 December 2021

Article published online:
16 February 2022

• References

• 1 Peiffer-Smadja N, Lucet JC, Bendjelloul G. et al. Challenges and issues about organizing a hospital to respond to the COVID-19 outbreak: experience from a French reference centre. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26 (06) 669-672
• 2 Shimizu K. 2019-nCoV, fake news, and racism. Lancet 2020; 395 (10225): 685-686
• 3 Ton AN, Jethwa T, Waters K, Speicher LL, Francis D. COVID-19 drive through testing: An effective strategy for conserving personal protective equipment. Am J Infect Control 2020; 48 (06) 731-732
• 4 Ross SW, Lauer CW, Miles WS. et al. Maximizing the calm before the storm: tiered surgical response plan for novel coronavirus (COVID-19). J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230 (06) 1080-1091
• 5 Diaz A, Sarac BA, Schoenbrunner AR, Janis JE, Pawlik TM. Elective surgery in the time of COVID-19. Am J Surg 2020; 219 (06) 900-902
• 6 Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R, Cheema S. Use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (12) e24087
• 7 Kruk ME, Myers M, Varpilah ST, Dahn BT. What is a resilient health system? Lessons from Ebola. Lancet 2015; 385 (9980): 1910-1912
• 8 Mann DM, Chen J, Chunara R, Testa PA, Nov O. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (07) 1132-1135
• 9 Kew KM, Cates CJ. Home telemonitoring and remote feedback between clinic visits for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (08) CD011714
• 10 Malasinghe LP, Ramzan N, Dahal K. Remote patient monitoring: a comprehensive study. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2020; 11 (10) 57-76
• 11 Farias FAC, Dagostini CM, Bicca YA, Falavigna VF, Falavigna A. Remote patient monitoring: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2020; 26 (05) 576-583
• 12 Hanlon P, Daines L, Campbell C, McKinstry B, Weller D, Pinnock H. Telehealth interventions to support self-management of long-term conditions: a systematic metareview of diabetes, heart failure, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (05) e172
• 13 Brahmbhatt DH, Cowie MR. Remote management of heart failure: an overview of telemonitoring technologies. Card Fail Rev 2019; 5 (02) 86-92
• 14 Watson AR, Wah R, Thamman R. The value of remote monitoring for the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2020; 26 (09) 1110-1112
• 15 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097
• 16 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Study quality assessment tool. Accessed May 28, 2021 at: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
• 17 Pawar P, Jones V, van Beijnum BJ, Hermens H. A framework for the comparison of mobile patient monitoring systems. J Biomed Inform 2012; 45 (03) 544-556
• 18 Annis T, Pleasants S, Hultman G. et al. Rapid implementation of a COVID-19 remote patient monitoring program. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (08) 1326-1330
• 19 Gordon WJ, Henderson D, DeSharone A. et al. Remote patient monitoring program for hospital discharged COVID-19 patients. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (05) 792-801
• 20 Medina M, Babiuch C, Card M. et al. Home monitoring for COVID-19. Cleve Clin J Med 2020; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.87a.ccc028.
• 21 Shah S, Majmudar K, Stein A. et al. Novel use of home pulse oximetry monitoring in COVID-19 patients discharged from the emergency department identifies need for hospitalization. Acad Emerg Med 2020; 27 (08) 681-692
• 22 Ye S, Hiura G, Fleck E. et al. Hospital readmissions after implementation of a discharge care program for patients with COVID-19 illness. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36 (03) 722-729
• 23 Bell LC, Norris-Grey C, Luintel A. et al; University College London Hospitals COVID response team. Implementation and evaluation of a COVID-19 rapid follow-up service for patients discharged from the emergency department. Clin Med (Lond) 2021; 21 (01) e57-e62
• 24 Martínez-García M, Bal-Alvarado M, Santos Guerra F. et al; en nombre del Equipo de Seguimiento Compartido TELEA-COVID Lugo, Equipo TELEA COVID-19 (Lugo). Monitoring of COVID-19 patients by telemedicine with telemonitoring [in Spanish]. Rev Clin Esp (Barc) 2020; 220 (08) 472-479013
• 25 Yordanov Y, Dechartres A, Lescure X. et al; AP-HP / Universities / Inserm COVID-19 Research Collaboration. Covidom, a telesurveillance solution for home monitoring patients with COVID-19. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (10) e20748
• 26 Ko SQ, Hooi BMY, Koo CY. et al. Remote monitoring of marginalised populations affected by COVID-19: a retrospective review. BMJ Open 2020; 10 (12) e042647
• 27 Xu H, Huang S, Qiu C. et al. Monitoring and management of home-quarantined patients with COVID-19 using a WeChat-based telemedicine system: retrospective cohort study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (07) e19514
• 28 Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17 (01) 88
• 29 Frey B. ed. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Vol. 4. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2018
• 30 Center for Disease Control Website. People with certain medical conditions. Accessed August 7, 2021 at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html
• 31 Lanning A, Meklaus G. Beyond COVID-19: four ways AI is shaping the future of healthcare. Accessed July 1, 2021 at: https://www.hcinnovationgroup.com/analytics-ai/artifical-intelligence-machine-learning/article/21223186/beyond-covid19-four-ways-ai-is-shaping-the-future-of-healthcare
• 32 The advancement of remote patient monitoring technology. Accessed July 1, 2021 at: https://www.medisticshealth.com/the-advancements-of-remote-patient-monitoring-technology/
• 33 Bonderman D. Artificial intelligence in cardiology. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2017; 129 (23-24): 866-868
• 34 Personalized physiology analytics by physIQ. Accessed July 1, 2021 at: https://www.physiq.com/technology/