Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2016; 125(10): 492-497
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-116049
Fortbildung – Dentalmaterialien-Spezial
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bulk-Fill-Komposite

N. Ilie
1   München/Regensburg/Erlangen
,
M. Rosentritt
1   München/Regensburg/Erlangen
,
U. Lohbauer
1   München/Regensburg/Erlangen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 November 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Entwicklungen im Bereich der plastischen Füllungsmaterialien sind durch die Bulk-Fill-Komposittechnologie geprägt. Sie wurden mit dem Ziel entwickelt die Applikationszeit einer Kompositfüllung deutlich zu verkürzen. Die veränderte Applikationstechnik beim Anlegen einer Füllung aus Bulk-Fill-Kompositen sowie die Vermarktung der Materialien als eine neue Kompositklasse fordern ein direkten Vergleich mit bislang bewerten Kompositmaterialien heraus. Der folgende Beitrag bietet einen Einblick in der chemischen Zusammensetzung, Eigenschaften und Merkmale von Bulk-Fill-Kompositen und weist auf die wichtigsten Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten zu bekannten Kompositklassen hin.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: An in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 618-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Sung R et al. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of monomers of uncured bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 711-720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ilie N. High viscosity Bulk-fill Giomer and Ormocer-based resin composites: an in vitro comparison of their Mechanical Behaviour. StomaEduJ 2016; 3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Moszner N, Fischer UK, Ganster B et al. Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dental Materials 2008; 24: 901-907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shortall AC, Palin WM, Burtscher P. Refractive index mismatch and monomer reactivity influence composite curing depth. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 84-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Azzopardi N, Moharamzadeh K, Wood DJ et al. Effect of resin matrix composition on the translucency of experimental dental composite resins. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1564-1568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lee YK, Lu H, Powers JM. Measurement of opalescence of resin composites. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 1068-1074
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ilie N, Lohbauer U, Rosentritt M. Lichtpolymerisation. ZWR 2016; 125: 284-289
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Neshchadin D, Rosspeintner A, Griesser M et al. Acylgermanes: Photoinitiators and sources for ge-centered radicals. Insights into their reactivity. J Am Chem Soc 2013; 135: 17314-17321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Finan L, Palin WM, Moskwa N et al. The influence of irradiation potential on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of two bulk-fill flowable RBC base materials. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 906-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ilie N, Fleming GJ. In vitro comparison of polymerisation kinetics and the micro-mechanical properties of low and high viscosity giomers and RBC materials. J Dent 2015; 43: 814-822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Musanje L, Darvell BW. Polymerization of resin composite restorative materials: exposure reciprocity. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 531-541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Musanje L, Darvell BW. Curing-light attenuation in filled-resin restorative materials. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 804-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ilie N, Stark K. Curing behaviour of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 977-985
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ilie N, Stark K. Effect of different curing protocols on the mechanical properties of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 271-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Hamidi MM et al. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. J Investig Clin Dent 2016; 7: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study. J Dent 2016; 51: 29-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Engelhardt F, Hahnel S, Preis V et al. Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Petrovic LM, Zorica DM, Stojanac I et al. A model of the viscoelastic behavior of flowable resin composites prior to setting. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 929-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 998-1006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zorzin J, Maier E, Harre S et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 293-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Roggendorf MJ, Kramer N, Appelt A et al. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent 2011; 39: 643-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL et al. Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 269-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Toh WS, Yap A, Lim SY. In vitro biocompatibility of contemporary bulk-fill composites. Oper Dent 2015; 40: 644-652
    PubMedGoogle Scholar