Endoscopy 2016; 48(11): 967-978
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-110397
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Major perioperative adverse events of peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic 5-year analysis

Xiao-Cen Zhang*
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Quan-Lin Li*
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Mei-Dong Xu
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Shi-Yao Chen
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Yun-Shi Zhong
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Yi-Qun Zhang
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Wei-Feng Chen
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Li-Li Ma
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Wen-Zheng Qin
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Jian-Wei Hu
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Ming-Yan Cai
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Li-Qing Yao
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
,
Ping-Hong Zhou
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted07 January 2016

accepted after revision26 May 2016

Publication Date:
22 July 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is now a widely used treatment for esophageal achalasia, supported by several large cohort studies. Although major perioperative adverse events (mAE) are rare, in-depth investigations of related risks and preventive measures are lacking. The aim of this study was to systematically assess mAEs during POEM by analyzing their incidence, risks, prevention, and management.

Patients and methods: This retrospective single-center analysis included all patients (n = 1680) undergoing POEM between August 2010 and July 2015 at Zhongshan Hospital. Major adverse events were defined as: vital-sign instability, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital readmission, conversion to open surgery, invasive postoperative procedure, blood transfusion, or prolonged (> 5 days) hospitalization for functional impairment.

Results: A total of 55 patients (3.3 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.5 % – 4.2 %) experienced mAEs: delayed mucosal barrier failure (n = 13, 0.8 %; 95 %CI 0.4 % – 1.3 %), delayed bleeding (n = 3, 0.2 %; 95 %CI 0.04 % – 0.5 %), hydrothorax (n = 8, 0.5 %; 95 %CI 0.2 % – 0.9 %), pneumothorax (n = 25, 1.5 %; 95 %CI 1.0 % – 2.2 %), and miscellaneous (n = 6, 0.4 %; 95 %CI 0.1 % – 0.8 %). Four patients (0.2 %) required ICU admission. No surgical conversion occurred, and 30-day mortality was zero. In stepwise multivariate regression, institution experience of < 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 3.85, 95 %CI 1.49 – 9.95), air insufflation (OR 3.41, 95 %CI 1.37 – 8.50), and mucosal edema (OR 2.01, 95 %CI 1.14 – 3.53) were identified as related risk factors. After introducing CO2 insufflation, the mAE rate declined to 1.9 % (95 %CI 1.2 % – 2.7 %) and seemed to plateau after 3.5 years at ~ 1 %.

Conclusion: In general, POEM appears to be a safe procedure. Major adverse events were rare and could usually be prevented or anticipated, and were all managed effectively.

* These authors contributed equally to this work.


 
  • References

  • 1 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
  • 2 Bechara R, Ikeda H, Inoue H. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: an evolving treatment for achalasia. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12: 410-426
  • 3 Stavropoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Friedel D et al. The International Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3322-3338
  • 4 Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221: 256-264
  • 5 Chen WF, Li QL, Zhou PH et al. Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia in pediatric patients: a prospective, single-center study. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 91-100
  • 6 Cai MY, Zhou PH, Yao LQ et al. Thoracic CT after peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 1046-1055
  • 7 Hu JW, Li QL, Zhou PH et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for advanced achalasia with sigmoid-shaped esophagus: long-term outcomes from a prospective, single-center study. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 2841-2850
  • 8 Li QL, Zhou PH, Yao LQ et al. Early diagnosis and management of delayed bleeding in the submucosal tunnel after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 370-374
  • 9 Maeda Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on the efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 335-341
  • 10 Alanezi K, Urschel JD. Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 10: 71-75
  • 11 Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery 2013; 154: 893-897
  • 12 Hungness ES, Teitelbaum EN, Santos BF et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 228-235
  • 13 Saxena P, Chavez YH, Kord Valeshabad A et al. An alternative method for mucosal flap closure during peroral endoscopic myotomy using an over-the-scope clipping device. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 579-581
  • 14 Kurian AA, Bhayani NH, Reavis K et al. Endoscopic suture repair of full-thickness esophagotomy during per-oral esophageal myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3910
  • 15 Yang D, Zhang Q, Draganov PV. Successful placement of a fully covered esophageal stent to bridge a difficult-to-close mucosal incision during peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy 2014; 46 (Suppl. 01) E467-468
  • 16 Zhang Y, Wang X, Fan Z. Reclosure of ruptured incision after peroral endoscopic myotomy using endoloops and metallic clips. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 295
  • 17 Orenstein SB, Raigani S, Wu YV et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) leads to similar results in patients with and without prior endoscopic or surgical therapy. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 1064-1070
  • 18 Sharata A, Kurian AA, Dunst CM et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is safe and effective in the setting of prior endoscopic intervention. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 1188-1192
  • 19 Li QL, Yao LQ, Xu XY et al. Repeat peroral endoscopic myotomy: a salvage option for persistent/recurrent symptoms. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 134-140
  • 20 Zhou PH, Li QL, Yao LQ et al. Peroral endoscopic remyotomy for failed Heller myotomy: a prospective single-center study. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 161-166
  • 21 Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata A et al. Peroral endoscopic esophageal myotomy: defining the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 719-725
  • 22 Patel KS, Calixte R, Modayil RJ et al. The light at the end of the tunnel: a single-operator learning curve analysis for per oral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1181-1187
  • 23 Werner YB, Costamagna G, Swanstrom LL et al. Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Gut 2016; 65: 899-906
  • 24 Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P et al. Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 cases). Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3267-3272