RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108433
Routine vs. on-demand analgesia in colonoscopy: a randomized clinical trial
Publikationsverlauf
submitted14. Dezember 2015
accepted after revision16. April 2016
Publikationsdatum:
15. Juni 2016 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/201609/lookinside/thumbnails/13610_10-1055-s-0042-108433-1.jpg)
Background and study aims: Colonoscopy is frequently performed with opioid analgesia, but the impact of drug delivery timing has not been studied in detail. Low-dose opioids administered before the procedure may provide better pain control than on-demand administration when the patient experiences pain.
Patients and methods: A total of 119 outpatients were randomized to receive 50 μg of fentanyl either before colonoscopy (routine group) or on demand if needed during the colonoscopy (on-demand group). Additional fentanyl or midazolam was allowed in both groups if required. The primary outcome was pain measured on both a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain) and a four-point Likert scale (no, slight, moderate, or severe pain) immediately after the procedure.
Results: A total of 61 patients in the routine group and 58 patients in the on-demand group were included in the study. Mean VAS pain scores were 27.4 mm in the routine group and 30.5 mm in the on-demand group (mean difference – 3.2 mm; 95 % confidence interval – 11.9 to 5.5; P = 0.5). On the Likert scale, moderate or severe pain was experienced by 25.0 % and 31.5 % of patients in the routine and on-demand groups, respectively (p = 0.5). Cecal intubation rate and time to reach the cecum were similar between the groups. More patients in the on-demand group (81.0 %) than in the routine group (62.3 %) were able to leave the clinic without the need for recovery time (P = 0.03).
Conclusion: Routine administration of fentanyl did not provide better analgesia during colonoscopy than on-demand fentanyl, and more patients needed time for recovery.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01786434).
-
References
- 1 Seip B, Bretthauer M, Dahler S et al. Patient satisfaction with on-demand sedation for outpatient colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 639-646
- 2 Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 967-974
- 3 Fanti L, Agostoni M, Gemma M et al. Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a nationwide web survey in Italy. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 726-730
- 4 Riphaus A, Rabofski M, Wehrmann T. Endoscopic sedation and monitoring practice in Germany: results from the first nationwide survey. Z Gastroenterol 2010; 48: 392-397
- 5 Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD et al. A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 27-34
- 6 McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 910-923
- 7 Eckardt VF, Kanzler G, Schmitt T et al. Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 560-565
- 8 Holme O, Bretthauer M, de Lange T et al. Risk stratification to predict pain during unsedated colonoscopy: results of a multicenter cohort study. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 691-696
- 9 Ylinen ER, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Pietila AM et al. Medication-free colonoscopy – factors related to pain and its assessment. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 2597-2607
- 10 Ong CK, Lirk P, Seymour RA et al. The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 757-773
- 11 Woolf CJ, Chong MS. Preemptive analgesia – treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 362-379
- 12 Terruzzi V, Meucci G, Radaelli F et al. Routine versus “on demand” sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 169-174
- 13 Basu S, Krishnamurthy B, Walsh TH. Value of fentanyl in flexible sigmoidoscopy. World J Surg 2004; 28: 930-934
- 14 Lazaraki G, Kountouras J, Metallidis S et al. Single use of fentanyl in colonoscopy is safe and effective and significantly shortens recovery time. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1631-1636
- 15 Eberl S, Polderman JA, Preckel B et al. Is “really conscious” sedation with solely an opioid an alternative to every day used sedation regimes for colonoscopies in a teaching hospital? Midazolam/fentanyl, propofol/alfentanil, or alfentanil only for colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18: 745-752
- 16 Dripps RD. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963; 24: 111
- 17 Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27: 117-126
- 18 Bretthauer M, Hoff G, Thiis-Evensen E et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces discomfort due to flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 1103-1107
- 19 Maslekar S, Gardiner A, Hughes M et al. Randomized clinical trial of Entonox versus midazolam-fentanyl sedation for colonoscopy. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 361-368
- 20 Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP et al. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27: 485-489
- 21 Vase L, Riley 3rd JL, Price DD. A comparison of placebo effects in clinical analgesic trials versus studies of placebo analgesia. Pain 2002; 99: 443-452
- 22 Hrobjartsson A, Gotzsche PC. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1594-1602
- 23 Park DI, Kim HJ, Park JH et al. Factors affecting abdominal pain during colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 695-699
- 24 Speroni KG, Hannah J, Atherton M et al. Evaluation of demographic, behavioral, and procedural factors on pain perception by patients undergoing colonoscopy and moderate sedation. Gastroenterol Nurs 2005; 28: 502-508
- 25 Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M et al. Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1295-1300
- 26 Early DS, Saifuddin T, Johnson JC et al. Patient attitudes toward undergoing colonoscopy without sedation. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 1862-1865
- 27 Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Portish V. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 554-559
- 28 Jones RM, Devers KJ, Kuzel AJ et al. Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38: 508-516
- 29 Garborg KK, Loberg M, Matre J et al. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 740-746
- 30 Rabenstein T, Radaelli F, Zolk O. Warm water infusion colonoscopy: a review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 940-951
- 31 Cooper GS, Kou TD, Rex DK. Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 551-556
- 32 Heuss LT, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Changing patterns of sedation and monitoring practice during endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 161-166
- 33 Larsen IK, Grotmol T, Bretthauer M et al. Continuous evaluation of patient satisfaction in endoscopy centres. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 850-855