Accuracy of polyp localization at colonoscopy

Background and study aims: Accurate documentation of lesion localization at the time of colonoscopic polypectomy is important for future surveillance, management of complications such as delayed bleeding, and for guiding surgical resection. We aimed to assess the accuracy of endoscopic localization of polyps during colonoscopy and examine variables that may influence this accuracy.

Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in consecutive patients presenting for elective, outpatient colonoscopy. All procedures were performed by Australian certified colonoscopists. The endoscopic location of each polyp was reported by the colonoscopist at the time of resection and prospectively recorded. Magnetic endoscope imaging was used to determine polyp location, and colonoscopists were blinded to this image. Three experienced colonoscopists, blinded to the endoscopist’s assessment of polyp location, independently scored the magnetic endoscope images to obtain a reference standard for polyp location (Cronbach alpha 0.98). The accuracy of colonoscopist polyp localization using this reference standard was assessed, and colonoscopist, procedural and patient variables affecting accuracy were evaluated.

Results: A total of 155 patients were enrolled and 282 polyps were resected in 95 patients by 14 colonoscopists. The overall accuracy of polyp localization was 85 % (95 % confidence interval, CI; 60 – 96 %). Accuracy varied significantly (P < 0.001) by colonic segment: caecum 100 %, ascending 77 % (CI;65 – 90), transverse 84 % (CI;75 – 92), descending 56 % (CI;32 – 81), sigmoid 88 % (CI;79 – 97), rectum 96 % (CI;90 – 101). There were significant differences in accuracy between colonoscopists (P < 0.001), and colonoscopist experience was a significant independent predictor of accuracy (OR 3.5, P = 0.028) after adjustment for patient and procedural variables.

Conclusions: Accuracy of localization of polyps is imprecise and affected by position within the colon and colonoscopist, including their level of experience. Magnetic endoscope imaging may improve the localization of lesions during colonoscopy.

• References

• 1 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
• 2 Frager DH, Frager JD, Wolf EL et al. Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: continued value of the barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 1987; 12: 343-346
• 3 Cho YB, Lee WY, Yun HR et al. Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg 2007; 31: 1491-1495
• 4 Tabibian N, Michaletz PA, Schwartz JT et al. Use of an endoscopically placed clip can avoid diagnostic errors in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34: 262-264
• 5 Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T. Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 932-935
• 6 Fletcher RH. The end of barium enemas?. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1823-1824
• 7 Lam DT, Kwong KH, Lam CW et al. How useful is colonoscopy in locating colorectal lesions?. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 839-841
• 8 Vignati P, Welch JP, Cohen JL. Endoscopic localization of colon cancers. Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 1085-1087
• 9 Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1259-1264
• 10 Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the Dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 385-391
• 11 Moss A, Bourke MJ, Pathmanathan N. Safety of colonic tattoo with sterile carbon particle suspension: a proposed guideline with illustrative cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 214-218
• 12 Jess P, Bulut O, Almasi A et al. The usefulness of a magnetic endoscope locating device in colonoscopy in daily practice: a prospective case-controlled study. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1353-1355
• 13 Ellul P, Fogden E, Simpson C et al. Colonic tumour localization using an endoscope positioning device. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23: 488-491
• 14 Shah SG, Pearson HJ, Moss S et al. Magnetic endoscope imaging: a new technique for localizing colonic lesions. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 900-904
• 15 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 573-577
• 16 Leung JW, Thai A, Yen A et al. Magnetic endoscope imaging (ScopeGuide) elucidates the mechanism of action of the pain-alleviating impact of water exchange colonoscopy - attenuation of loop formation. J Interv Gastroenterol 2012; 2: 142-146
• 17 Mark-Christensen A, Brandsborg S, Iversen LH. Magnetic endoscopic imaging as an adjuvant to elective colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 251-261
• 18 Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Dahler S et al. Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 885-889
• 19 Nerup N, Preisler L, Svendsen MB et al. Assessment of colonoscopy by use of magnetic endoscopic imaging: design and validation of an automated tool. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2015; 81: 548-554
• 20 Cheung HY, Chung CC, Kwok SY et al. Improvement in colonoscopy performance with adjunctive magnetic endoscope imaging: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 214-217
• 21 Stanciu C, Trifan A, Khder SA. Accuracy of colonoscopy in localizing colonic cancer. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2007; 111: 39-43
• 22 Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brooker JC et al. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 1-8