Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(05): E534-E537
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-102877
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Colonoscopy without sedation: Patient factors alone are less likely to influence its uptake

Nusrat Iqbal
1   Department of Surgery, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, UK
,
Sean Ramcharan
1   Department of Surgery, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, UK
,
Samer Doughan
2   Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, UK
,
Irshad Shaikh
3   Department of General Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 02 December 2014

accepted after revision 08 February 2016

Publication Date:
03 May 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: Conscious sedation during colonoscopy minimizes discomfort, improves polyp detection rates, and reduces technical failure, but carries medication-related risks and requires dedicated and costly recovery services. Sedation-free procedures may offer a safer alternative. We aimed to compare this group with those receiving sedation to determine differences in patient characteristics, cecal intubation rates, polyp detection rates, discomfort levels and safety in patients for whom anesthesia is high risk.

Patients and methods: Prospectively collected data from all colonoscopies performed over a 1-year period at three district general hospitals were analyzed. Conscious sedation was offered to all patients and outcomes in those who refused were compared with outcomes in those who received sedation.

Results: One hundred ninety-four of 1694 (11 %) colonoscopies were performed without sedation (61 % male, P < 0.001) but rates varied between hospitals. Of these, 55 % were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 or more and 5 % experienced moderate discomfort, compared to 40 % (P < 0.0001) and 10 % (P = 0.023) respectively of those receiving sedation. They were more likely to have indications of rectal bleeding or frequency of stool and less likely to have anaemia or macroscopic inflammation at colonoscopy. Complications, completion. and polyp detection rates were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Colonoscopy without sedation can be completed successfully in select patients without compromising comfort or polyp detection rates and is safe in those for whom anesthesia is high risk. It is therefore a safe alternative for clinicians concerned about sedation, but the findings suggest that hospital, rather than patient factors, may prevent its uptake.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lee TJW, Blanks RG, Rutter MD et al. Efficacy and safety of colonoscopy in the UK NHS bowel cancer screening programme. Gut 2011; 60: A22
  • 2 Waye JD. Colonoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 1972; 52: 1013-1024
  • 3 Bannert C, Reinhart K, Dunkler D et al. Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1837-48
  • 4 Baudet JS, Aguirre-Jaime A. The sedation increases the acceptance of repeat colonoscopies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 775-780
  • 5 Ko CW, Riffle S, Michaels L et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastro Hepatol 2010; 8: 166-173
  • 6 Safety and Sedation During Endoscopic Procedures. British Society of Gastroenterology Guidelines. 2012
  • 7 Jonas DE, Russell LB, Sandler RS et al. Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2401-2410
  • 8 Leung FW. Is there a place for sedationless colonoscopy?. J Interv Gatroenterol 2011; 1: 19-22
  • 9 Leung FW, Aljebreen AM. Unsedated colonoscopy: Is it feasible?. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 289-292
  • 10 Petrini JL, Egan JV, Hahn WV. Unsedated colonoscopy: patient characteristics and satisfaction in a community-based endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 567-572
  • 11 Quality Assurance Guidelines for Colonoscopy. NHS BCSP Publication No. 6. 02/2011
  • 12 Hemmasi G, Sohrabi M, Zamani F et al. Prevalence of colorectal adenoma in an average-risk population aged 40-50 versus 50-60 years. Eur J Cancer Prev 2015; 24: 386-390
  • 13 Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RG et al. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 203-211
  • 14 Solís-Muñoz P, Solís-Herruzo JA, Rodríguez-Muñoz S. Experience of the endoscopist increases detection rates of smaller size and higher histological grade polyp. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29: 1237-1241
  • 15 Terruzzi V, Paggi S, Amato A et al. Unsedated colonoscopy: A neverending story. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 4: 137-141
  • 16 Leung FW, Aljebreen AM, Brocchi E et al. Sedation-risk-free colonoscopy for minimizing the burden of colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2: 81-89
  • 17 Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A et al. Unsedated colonoscopy: an option for some but not for all. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 392-398