RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741468
The Dynamic History of the Ophthalmology Residency Matching Program
Funding None.Abstract
Background The ophthalmology residency matching program is the first successful medical specialty match, dating back to 1979. This article reviews the impetus for starting the match and the roles that ophthalmologists Bruce Spivey, MD, and August Colenbrander, MD, PhD, played in establishing the match and developing the machinery to make it possible. Challenges to the match's operations over the years have improved the process.
Objective This article aims to research the roles of key individuals and institutions in establishing and maintaining the ophthalmology residency matching program.
Methods Oral and written interviews with key participants in establishing and maintaining the match were conducted. Primary and secondary written materials were reviewed.
Results Two physicians played key roles in establishing the ophthalmology residency matching program. Bruce Spivey, MD, spearheaded the drive to persuade the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) to support and sponsor the match. August Colenbrander, MD, PhD, created the original match algorithm and single-handedly ran the match process in the early years. Obstacles were overcome, including resistance from the Association of American Medical College's National Resident Matching Program, a challenge to the validity of the algorithm, and the threat that antitrust laws might prohibit all graduate medical education residency match programs. The ophthalmology match evolved over time to become a more formal entity, the San Francisco Matching Program (SF Match). With continued support of the AUPO, the process of matching applicants to residency programs has flourished despite contemporary challenges related to electronic applications and social media.
Conclusion The ophthalmology residency matching program has benefited applicants and teaching programs for more than four decades due to visionary founders, ongoing support of the AUPO, and strong leadership within SF Match.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 01. September 2021
Angenommen: 12. Oktober 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Februar 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Mullin FJ, Stalnaker JM. The matching plan for internship appointment. J Med Educ 1951; 26 (05) 341-346
- 2 Stalnaker JM. The matching program for intern placement. J Med Educ 1953; 28 (11) 13-20
- 3 Roth AE. The origins, history, and design of the resident match. JAMA 2003; 289 (07) 909-912
- 4 Nakayama DK, Hendren III WH. The 1951 Harvard student uprising against the intern match. Surgery 2017; 161 (06) 1728-1734
- 5 1965 Social Security Act (Senate Report No. 404, Pt. 1, 89th Congress, 1st Sess. 36 [1965]; H.R. No. 213, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 32 [1965])
- 6 Iglehart JK. Support for academic medical centers–revisiting the 1997 Balanced Budget Act. N Engl J Med 1999; 341 (04) 299-304
- 7 Shaffer RN. The History of the American Board of Ophthalmology 1916–1991. Rochester, MN: Johnson Printing Co.; 1991: 30-31
- 8 Anderson ST, Nora LM, McEntee CW, Fitzgerald ME, Nugent SG. The history, role, and value of public directors on certifying boards: the American Board of Ophthalmology experience. Ophthalmology 2016; 123 (9, Suppl): S36-S39
- 9 Gale D, Shapley LS. College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 1962; 69 (01) 9-15
- 10 Ball P. A Nobel for the art of matchmaking. Nature 2012; DOI: 10.1038/nature.2012.11607.
- 11 Roth AE. The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory. J Polit Econ 1984; 92: 991-1016
- 12 About AUPO. History. Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology website. Accessed July 15, 2021 at: https://aupo.org/about-aupo/history
- 13 People: Research Staff. The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute website. Accessed July 15, 2021 at: https://www.ski.org/users/august-colenbrander
- 14 Association of American Medical Colleges. Organization of Student Representatives (OSR) Administrative Board Meeting Minutes. Washington, DC; September 21, 1983;1–2. Accessed July 19, 2021 at: https://www.aamc.org/media/18246/download
- 15 Williams KJ, Werth VP, Wolff JA. An analysis of the resident match. N Engl J Med 1981; 304 (19) 1165-1166
- 16 National resident matching program. N Engl J Med 1981; 305 (09) 525-526
- 17 Colenbrander A. National Resident Matching Program. Examining the NRMP algorithm. Acad Med 1996; 71 (04) 309-312
- 18 Roth AE, Peranson E. National Resident Matching Program. The effects of the change in the NRMP matching algorithm. JAMA 1997; 278 (09) 729-732
- 19 Jung v Association of American Medical Colleges, 339 F Supp 2d 26 (DDC 2004).
- 20 Miller FH, Greaney TL. National Resident Matching Program. The National Resident Matching Program and antitrust law. JAMA 2003; 289 (07) 913-918
- 21 Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 USC section 1 (1890).
- 22 Bierig JR. Jung v. Association of American Medical Colleges: the lawsuit challenging our system of graduate medical education. J Am Coll Radiol 2004; 1 (01) 40-47
- 23 Madison K. The residency match: competitive restraints in an imperfect world. Houst Law Rev 2005; 42 (03) 759-836
- 24 Weinmeyer R. Challenging the medical residency matching system through antitrust litigation. AMA J Ethics 2015; 17 (02) 149-153
- 25 Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004 § 207, Pub L No. 108–218, 118 Stat 596 (2004) (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 37b). Accessed October 31, 2021 at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-108publ218/pdf/PLAW-108publ218.pdf
- 26 Ophthalmology Residency. San Francisco Residency and Fellowship Match Services website. Accessed July 15, 2021 at: https://sfmatch.org/SpecialtyInsideAll.aspx?id=6&typ=2&name=Ophthalmology#
- 27 Ophthalmology: Eye Physicians & Surgeons Forum. The Student Doctor Network website. Accessed July 25, 2021 at: https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/match-stats-are-out.101586/
- 28 Weissbart SJ, Kim SJ, Feinn RS, Stock JA. Relationship between the number of residency applications and the yearly match rate: time to start thinking about an application limit?. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 (01) 81-85
- 29 Venincasa MJ, Steren B, Young BK. et al. Ophthalmology residency match in the Covid-19 era: applicant and program director perceptions of the 2020–2021 application cycle. Semin Ophthalmol 2021; (04) 1-6
- 30 Couples in the Match. The National Resident Matching Program website. Accessed July 15, 2021 at: https://www.nrmp.org/couples-in-the-match/
- 31 Wu Y, Lee CS, Lee AY, Van Gelder RN. Algorithmic optimization of residency matching for a win-win outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2021; 62 (08) 2648
- 32 Barchilon J, Darley W. National psychiatric residency matching program. J Med Educ 1966; 41 (09) 884-888
- 33 Graettinger JS. The residency matching program. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104 (11) 615-619