Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2023; 36(06): 673-681
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741394
Original Article

Preoperative Factors Associated with Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Scores after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Gregory T. Perraut
1   Department of Orthopedics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Tina Zhang 
2   Department of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Tristan B. Weir 
2   Department of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Matheus B. Schneider 
2   Department of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Ali Aneizi
2   Department of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Natalie L. Leong
2   Department of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Jonathan D. Packer
2   Department of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Sean J. Meredith
2   Department of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
R Frank Henn  III
2   Department of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
› Author Affiliations Funding This work was supported in part by Career Development Award Number (grant no.: IK2 BX004879) from the United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory R&D (BLRD) Service.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Patient satisfaction is increasingly used as a metric to evaluate the quality of healthcare services and to determine hospital and physician compensation. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery (PGAS) satisfaction scores, and to evaluate the effect of each PGAS domain score on the total PGAS score variability in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). A review of a Press Ganey (PG) database at a single center was performed for patients undergoing ACLR between 2015 and 2019. Ninety-nine patients completed the PGAS survey and 54 also completed preoperative demographic and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for an orthopaedic registry. PGAS scores were calculated and bivariate analysis was performed. Multivariable linear regression determined the effect of each of the six PGAS domains on the total PGAS score variability. In the total cohort of 99 patients, no factors were significantly associated with the total PGAS score or any domain scores. For the 54 patients who also participated in the orthopaedic registry, none of the preoperative PROMs were significantly correlated with total PGAS score. However, having a college degree (89 vs. 95 or 97 points; p = 0.02) and continuous femoral nerve catheter (92 vs. 100 points; p = 0.04) was associated with lower personal issue domain scores, while patients with a greater number of prior surgeries had worse registration domain scores (ρ = -0.27; p = 0.049). For the entire cohort, the registration and facility domains contributed the most variability to the total PGAS score, while the physician domain contributed the least. Few preoperative factors are associated with PGAS scores, and total PGAS scores do not significantly correlate with baseline PROMs. Surgeons may have limited ability to improve their PGAS scores given most of the variability in total scores stems from systemic aspects of the patient experience.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - ACL - Press Ganey - satisfaction - ACLR


Publication History

Received: 07 August 2021

Accepted: 16 November 2021

Article published online:
03 January 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Chughtai M, Patel NK, Gwam CU. et al. Do Press Ganey scores correlate with total knee arthroplasty-specific outcome questionnaires in postsurgical patients?. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (9S): S109-S112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Etier Jr BE, Orr SP, Antonetti J, Thomas SB, Theiss SM. Factors impacting Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores in orthopedic surgery spine clinic. Spine J 2016; 16 (11) 1285-1289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Abtahi AM, Presson AP, Zhang C, Saltzman CL, Tyser AR. Association between orthopaedic outpatient satisfaction and non-modifiable patient factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (13) 1041-1048
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zusman EE. HCAHPS replaces Press Ganey survey as quality measure for patient hospital experience. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (02) N21-N24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Martinez JR, Nakonezny PA, Batty M, Wells J. The dimension of the Press Ganey survey most important in evaluating patient satisfaction in the academic outpatient orthopedic surgery setting. Orthopedics 2019; 42 (04) 198-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chughtai M, Gwam CU, Khlopas A. et al. No correlation between Press Ganey survey responses and outcomes in post-total hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (03) 783-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kohring JM, Pelt CE, Anderson MB, Peters CL, Gililland JM. Press Ganey outpatient medical practice survey scores do not correlate with patient-reported outcomes after primary joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (08) 2417-2422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rane AA, Tyser AR, Presson AP, Zhang C, Kazmers NH. Patient satisfaction in the hand surgery clinic: an analysis of factors that impact the Press Ganey survey. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (07) 539-547.e1 , e531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chughtai M, Jauregui JJ, Mistry JB. et al. What influences how patients rate their hospital after total knee arthroplasty?. Surg Technol Int 2016; 28: 261-265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ganey P. OAS CAHPS FAQ. Accessed December 5, 2021 at: https://www.pressganey.com/resources/program-summary/oas-cahps-faq. Published 2019.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Henn III RF, Dubina AG, Jauregui JJ, Smuda MP, Tracy JK. The Maryland Orthopaedic Registry (MOR): design and baseline characteristics of a prospective registry. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017; 8 (04) 301-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs K, Zurakowski D, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84 (09) 1560-1572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Allen PR, Denham RA, Swan AV. Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy. Factors affecting the knee after operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66 (05) 666-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jones MH, Spindler KP, Andrish JT. et al; MOON Knee Group. Differences in the lateral compartment joint space width after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the MOON onsite cohort. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (04) 876-882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nwachukwu BU, Voleti PB, Berkanish P. et al. Return to play and patient satisfaction after ACL reconstruction: study with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (09) 720-725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stephens AR, Tyser AR, Kazmers NH. The impact of social deprivation on orthopaedic outpatient satisfaction using the Press Ganey Outpatient Medical Practice Survey. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28 (24) e1111-e1120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tyser AR, Gaffney CJ, Zhang C, Presson AP. The association of patient satisfaction with pain, anxiety, and self-reported physical function. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (21) 1811-1818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rane AA, Tyser AR, Kazmers NH. Evaluating the impact of wait time on orthopaedic outpatient satisfaction using the Press Ganey survey. JBJS Open Access 2019; 4 (04) e0014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Compton J, Glass N, Fowler T. Evidence of selection bias and non-response bias in patient satisfaction surveys. Iowa Orthop J 2019; 39 (01) 195-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tyser AR, Abtahi AM, McFadden M, Presson AP. Evidence of non-response bias in the Press-Ganey patient satisfaction survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16 (a): 350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar