CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2021; 12(04): 202-213
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740489
Review Article

Gastroesophageal Reflux after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: Myth or Reality?

1   Shivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, India
,
1   Shivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, India
,
2   Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an accepted treatment for achalasia cardia (AC), and results are comparable to those of laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). In recent years, several reports have confirmed higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) following POEM. This review evaluates the current evidence regarding post-POEM GER, critically examines the potential contributing factors responsible for GER, limitations of the current available functional testing, and precautions and preventive measures, and provides future directions for research. Factors conclusively contributing to increased post-POEM GER include injury to the sling fibers of the lower esophageal sphincter, length of gastric myotomy > 2 cm, and others. Historically, these same factors have been implicated for development of GER after surgical (laparoscopic) myotomy. Although less invasive, optimal technique of POEM may be important to control post-POEM GER. Most post-POEM GER occurs during the immediate post-POEM period, is mild, and is easily treatable using proton-pump inhibitors. GER incidence plateaus at 2 years and is comparable to that after LHM. Patients should therefore be prescribed proton-pump inhibitors for at least 2 years. Antireflux procedures (ARPs) are infrequently required in these patients as the incidence of refractory GER is low. Novel ARPs have been recently described and are currently under evaluation. Conclusive diagnosis of GER is a clinical challenge. Most patients are asymptomatic, and GER is diagnosed only on abnormal esophageal acid exposure (EAE). Studies have demonstrated that current measures to diagnose GER are inadequate, inaccurate, and cannot differentiate between true GER and abnormal EAE due to food fermentation in the distal esophagus. The Lyon Consensus criteria should be implemented for confirmation of diagnosis of GER. Finally, the review recommends an evidence-based clinical algorithm for evaluation and management of post-POEM GER and provides guidelines for future research in this field.



Publication History

Article published online:
18 January 2022

© 2022. Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42 (04) 265-271
  • 2 Bapaye A, Korrapati SK, Dharamsi S, Dubale N. Third space endoscopy: lessons learnt from a decade of submucosal endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 54 (02) 114-129
  • 3 von Renteln D, Inoue H, Minami H. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective single center study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107 (03) 411-417
  • 4 Stavropoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Friedel D, Savides T. The International Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (09) 3322-3338
  • 5 Onimaru M, Inoue H, Ikeda H. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy is a viable option for failed surgical esophagocardiomyotomy instead of redo surgical Heller myotomy: a single center prospective study. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217 (04) 598-605
  • 6 Ling TS, Guo HM, Yang T, Peng CY, Zou XP, Shi RH. Effectiveness of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the treatment of achalasia: a pilot trial in Chinese Han population with a minimum of one-year follow-up. J Dig Dis 2014; 15 (07) 352-358
  • 7 Sharata A, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Bhayani NH, Reavis KM, Swanstrom LL. Technique of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) of the esophagus (with video). Surg Endosc 2014; 28 (04) 1333
  • 8 Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221 (02) 256-264
  • 9 Familiari P, Greco S, Gigante G. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: analysis of clinical, procedural and functional factors, associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophagitis. Dig Endosc 2016; 28 (01) 33-41
  • 10 Hungness ES, Sternbach JM, Teitelbaum EN, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Soper NJ. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after the learning curve: durable long-term results with a low complication rate. Ann Surg 2016; 264 (03) 508-517
  • 11 Ramchandani M, Nageshwar Reddy D, Darisetty S. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: treatment analysis and follow up of over 200 consecutive patients at a single center. Dig Endosc 2016; 28 (01) 19-26
  • 12 Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Sasaki T. et al. A prospective analysis of GERD after POEM on anterior myotomy. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (06) 2496-2504
  • 13 Kumbhari V, Familiari P, Bjerregaard NC. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter case-control study. Endoscopy 2017; 49 (07) 634-642
  • 14 Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Chavan R. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: outcomes in over 400 consecutive patients. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5 (05) E331-E339
  • 15 Li Q-L, Wu Q-N, Zhang X-C. et al. Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87 (06) 1405-1412.e3
  • 16 Werner YB, Hakanson B, Martinek J. et al. Endoscopic or surgical myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 2019; 381 (23) 2219-2229
  • 17 Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Onimaru M. et al. Multicenter collaborative retrospective evaluation of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: analysis of data from more than 1300 patients at eight facilities in Japan. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (01) 464-468
  • 18 Ponds FA, Fockens P, Lei A. et al. Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs pneumatic dilation on symptom severity and treatment outcomes among treatment-naive patients with achalasia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 322 (02) 134-144
  • 19 Teitelbaum EN, Dunst CM, Reavis KM. et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (01) 421-427
  • 20 Schlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2018; 267 (03) 451-460
  • 21 Martinek J, Svecova H, Vackova Z. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): mid-term efficacy and safety. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (03) 1293-1302
  • 22 Aiolfi A, Bona D, Riva CG. et al. Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic Heller myotomy, pneumatic dilatation, and peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30 (02) 147-155
  • 23 Arevalo G, Sippey M, Martin-Del-Campo LA, He J, Ali A, Marks J. Post-POEM reflux: who's at risk?. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (07) 3163-3168
  • 24 Rösch T, Repici A, Boeckxstaens G. Will reflux kill POEM?. Endoscopy 2017; 49 (07) 625-628
  • 25 Repici A, Fuccio L, Maselli R. et al. GERD after per-oral endoscopic myotomy as compared with Heller's myotomy with fundoplication: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87 (04) 934-943.e18
  • 26 Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Kotla R. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy is unpredictable, but responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy: a large, single-center study. Endoscopy 2020; 52 (08) 643-651
  • 27 Sharata AM, Dunst CM, Pescarus R. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19 (01) 161-170 , discussion 170
  • 28 Sanaka MR, Thota PN, Parikh MP. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy leads to higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure than laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (07) 2284-2292
  • 29 Ramirez M, Zubieta C, Ciotola F. et al. Per oral endoscopic myotomy vs. laparoscopic Heller myotomy, does gastric extension length matter?. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (01) 282-288
  • 30 Olson MT, Triantafyllou T, Singhal S. A decade of investigation: peroral endoscopic myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29 (09) 1093-1104
  • 31 Jones EL, Meara MP, Schwartz JS, Hazey JW, Perry KA. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms do not correlate with objective pH testing after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (03) 947-952
  • 32 Lu B, Li M, Hu Y, Xu Y, Zhang S, Cai LJ. Effect of peroral esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: a Chinese study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21 (18) 5622-5629
  • 33 Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Sato H. et al. Peroral endoscopicmyotomy for achalasia: a prospective multicenter study in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91 (05) 1037-1044.e2
  • 34 Hernández-Mondragón OV, Solórzano-Pineda OM, González-Martínez M, Blancas-Valencia JM. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: short-term, medium-term, and long-term results. Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) 2020; 85 (01) 4-11
  • 35 Isomoto H, Ikebuchi Y. Japanese guidelines for peroral endoscopic myotomy: 1st edition. Dig Endosc 2019; 31 (01) 27-29
  • 36 Ellis F, Cole FL. Reflux after cardiomyotomy. Gut 1965; 6: 80-84
  • 37 Andreollo NA, Earlam RJ. Heller's myotomy for achalasia: is an added anti-reflux procedure necessary?. Br J Surg 1987; 74 (09) 765-769
  • 38 Heller E. Extramukose Kardioplastik beim chronischen Kardiospasmus mil Dilatation des Oesophagus. Mitt Grenzgeb Med Chir 1914; 27: 141-149
  • 39 Zaaijer JH. Cardiospasm in the aged. Ann Surg 1923; 77 (05) 615-617
  • 40 Earlam RJ, Ellis Jr FH, Nobrega FT. Achalasia of the esophagus in a small urban community. Mayo Clin Proc 1969; 44 (07) 478-483
  • 41 Spiess AE, Kahrilas PJ. Treating achalasia: from whalebone to laparoscope. JAMA 1998; 280 (07) 638-642
  • 42 Torquati A, Lutfi R, Khaitan L, Sharp KW, Richards WO. Heller myotomy vs Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication: cost-utility analysis of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2006; 20 (03) 389-393
  • 43 Kumagai K, Kjellin A, Tsai JA. et al. Toupet versus Dor as a procedure to prevent reflux after cardiomyotomy for achalasia: results of a randomised clinical trial. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (07) 673-680
  • 44 Rawlings A, Soper NJ, Oelschlager B. et al. Laparoscopic Dor versus Toupet fundoplication following Heller myotomy for achalasia: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized-controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2012; 26 (01) 18-26
  • 45 Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB. et al; European Achalasia Trial Investigators. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (19) 1807-1816
  • 46 Csendes A, Braghetto I, Burdiles P, Korn O, Csendes P, Henríquez A. Very late results of esophagomyotomy for patients with achalasia: clinical, endoscopic, histologic, manometric, and acid reflux studies in 67 patients for a mean follow-up of 190 months. Ann Surg 2006; 243 (02) 196-203
  • 47 Popoff AM, Myers JA, Zelhart M. et al. Long-term symptom relief and patient satisfaction after Heller myotomy and Toupet fundoplication for achalasia. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (03) 339-342 , discussion 342
  • 48 Simić AP, Radovanović NS, Skrobić OM, Raznatović ZJ, Pesko PM. Significance of limited hiatal dissection in surgery for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14 (04) 587-593
  • 49 Inoue H, Shiwaku H, Kobayashi Y. et al. Statement for gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy from an international multicenter experience. Esophagus 2020; 17 (01) 3-10
  • 50 Baldaque-Silva F, Marques M, Vilas-Boas F, Maia JD, Sá F, Macedo G. New transillumination auxiliary technique for peroral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79 (04) 544-545
  • 51 Grimes KL, Inoue H, Onimaru M. et al. Double-scope per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (04) 1344-1351
  • 52 Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G. et al. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus 2018;31(09):
  • 53 Inoue H, Shiwaku H, Iwakiri K. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for peroral endoscopic myotomy. Dig Endosc 2018; 30 (05) 563-579
  • 54 Grimes KL, Bechara R, Shimamura Y, Ikeda H, Inoue H. Gastric myotomy length affects severity but not rate of post-procedure reflux: 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial of double-scope per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (07) 2963-2968
  • 55 Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Kawara F. et al. Novel per-oral endoscopic myotomy method preserving oblique muscle using two penetrating vessels as anatomic landmarks reduces postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34 (12) 2158-2163
  • 56 Tanaka S, Kawara F, Toyonaga T. et al. Two penetrating vessels as a novel indicator of the appropriate distal end of peroral endoscopic myotomy. Dig Endosc 2018; 30 (02) 206-211
  • 57 Stavropoulos SN, Zhang X, Islam S. et al. Sa1227 The “Anti-Reflux” POEM: A Technique Modification That Drastically Reduces Objectively Measured Reflux After Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91 (06) AB119
  • 58 Ramchandani M, Nabi Z, Reddy DN. et al. Outcomes of anterior myotomy versus posterior myotomy during POEM: a randomized pilot study. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6 (02) E190-E198
  • 59 Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Rivory J. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: anterior versus posterior approach: a randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91 (02) 288-297.e7
  • 60 Wang XH, Tan YY, Zhu HY, Li CJ, Liu DL. Full-thickness myotomy is associated with higher rate of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (42) 9419-9426
  • 61 Li C, Gong A, Zhang J. et al. Clinical outcomes and safety of partial full-thickness myotomy versus circular muscle myotomy in peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia patients. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017: 2676513
  • 62 Li QL, Chen WF, Zhou PH. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a clinical comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and circular muscle myotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217 (03) 442-451
  • 63 Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE. et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility measurements during Heller myotomy and POEM for achalasia predict postoperative symptomatic outcomes. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (03) 522-528
  • 64 Teitelbaum EN, Sternbach JM, El Khoury R. et al. The effect of incremental distal gastric myotomy lengths on EGJ distensibility during POEM for achalasia. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (02) 745-750
  • 65 Ponds FA, Oors JM, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Reflux symptoms and oesophageal acidification in treated achalasia patients are often not reflux related. Gut 2021; 70 (01) 30-39
  • 66 Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101 (08) 1900-1920 , quiz 1943
  • 67 Shoenut JP, Duerksen D, Yaffe CS. A prospective assessment of gastroesophageal reflux before and after treatment of achalasia patients: pneumatic dilation versus transthoracic limited myotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92 (07) 1109-1112
  • 68 Fisichella PM, Raz D, Palazzo F, Niponmick I, Patti MG. Clinical, radiological, and manometric profile in 145 patients with untreated achalasia. World J Surg 2008; 32 (09) 1974-1979
  • 69 Shoenut JP, Micflikier AB, Yaffe CS, Den Boer B, Teskey JM. Reflux in untreated achalasia patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995; 20 (01) 6-11
  • 70 Smart HL, Foster PN, Evans DF, Slevin B, Atkinson M. Twenty four hour oesophageal acidity in achalasia before and after pneumatic dilatation. Gut 1987; 28 (07) 883-887
  • 71 Crookes PF, Corkill S, DeMeester TR. Gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia. When is reflux really reflux?. Dig Dis Sci 1997; 42 (07) 1354-1361
  • 72 Bechara R, Inoue H, Shimamura Y, Reed D. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: lest we forget what we already know. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32 (12) doz106
  • 73 Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E. et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut 2018; 67 (07) 1351-1362
  • 74 Roman S, Gyawali CP, Savarino E. et al; GERD consensus group. Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29 (10) 1-15
  • 75 Bapaye A, Dashatwar P, Dharamsi S, Pujari R, Gadhikar H. Single-session endoscopic fundoplication after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM+F) for prevention of post gastroesophageal reflux - 1-year follow-up study. Endoscopy 2021; 53 (11) 1114-1121
  • 76 Modayil RJ, Zhang X, Rothberg B. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: 10-year outcomes from a large, single-center U.S. series with high follow-up completion and comprehensive analysis of long-term efficacy, safety, objective GERD, and endoscopic functional luminal assessment. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94 (05) 930-942
  • 77 Akintoye E, Kumar N, Obaitan I, Alayo QA, Thompson CC. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2016; 48 (12) 1059-1068
  • 78 Werner YB, Costamagna G, Swanström LL. et al. Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Gut 2016; 65 (06) 899-906
  • 79 Ichkhanian Y, Benias P, Khashab MA. Case of early Barrett cancer following peroral endoscopic myotomy. Gut 2019; 68 (12) 2107-2110
  • 80 Swanström LL. POEM: the sun rises in the East…. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87 (06) 1413-1414
  • 81 Tyberg A, Choi A, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Transoral incisional fundoplication for reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a crucial addition to our arsenal. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6 (05) E549-E552
  • 82 Kumta NA, Kedia P, Sethi A, Kahaleh M. Transoral incisionless fundoplication for treatment of refractory GERD after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81 (01) 224-225
  • 83 Inoue H, Ueno A, Shimamura Y. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy and fundoplication: a novel NOTES procedure. Endoscopy 2019; 51 (02) 161-164
  • 84 Bapaye A, Dharamsi S, Jain R. et al. Concomitant endoscopic fundoplication - can it reduce the risk of gastroesophageal reflux following peroral endoscopic myotomy?. Endoscopy 2020; 52 (02) E73-E74
  • 85 Toshimori A, Inoue H, Shimamura Y, Abad MRA, Onimaru M. Peroral endoscopic fundoplication: a brand-new intervention for GERD. VideoGIE 2020; 5 (06) 244-246