Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(02): 150-159
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740248
Original Article

Severe Maternal Morbidity among Women in the U. S. Military, 2003–2015

Clinton Hall
1   Deployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California
2   Leidos Inc., San Diego, California
,
Celeste J. Romano
1   Deployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California
2   Leidos Inc., San Diego, California
,
Anna T. Bukowinski
1   Deployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California
2   Leidos Inc., San Diego, California
,
Gia R. Gumbs
1   Deployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California
2   Leidos Inc., San Diego, California
,
Kaitlyn N. Dempsey
3   School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia
,
Aaron T. Poole
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia
5   Las Palmas Del Sol Healthcare, El Paso, Texas
,
Ava Marie S. Conlin
1   Deployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California
,
Shannon V. Lamb
6   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
› Author Affiliations Funding This work was supported by the U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery under work unit no. 60504.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess trends and correlates of severe maternal morbidity at delivery among active duty women in the U.S. military, all of whom are guaranteed health care and full employment.

Study Design Linked military personnel and medical encounter data from the Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research program were used to identify a cohort of delivery hospitalizations among active duty military women from January 2003 through August 2015. Cases of severe maternal morbidity were identified by applying 21- and 20-condition algorithms (with and without blood transfusion) developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rates (per 10,000 delivery hospitalizations) were reported overall and by specific condition. Multivariable Poisson regression models estimated associations with demographic, clinical, and military characteristics.

Results Overall, 187,063 hospitalizations for live births were included for analyses. The overall 21- and 20-condition severe maternal morbidity rates were 111.7 (n = 2089) and 37.4 (n = 699) per 10,000 delivery hospitalizations, respectively. The 21-condition rate increased by 184% from 2003 to 2015; the 20-condition rate increased by 40%. Compared with non-Hispanic White women, the adjusted 21-condition rate of severe maternal morbidity was higher for Hispanic (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13–1.46), non-Hispanic Black (aRR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.21–1.49), Asian/Pacific Islander (aRR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.13–1.61), and American Indian/Alaska Native (aRR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06–1.82) women. Rates also varied by age, clinical factors, and deployment history.

Conclusion Active duty U.S. military women experienced an increase in severe maternal morbidity from 2003 to 2015 that followed national trends, despite protective factors such as stable employment and universal health care. Similar to other populations, military women of color were at higher risk for severe maternal morbidity relative to non-Hispanic White military women. Continued surveillance and further investigation into maternal health outcomes are critical for identifying areas of improvement in the Military Health System.

Key Points

  • Cesarean delivery and multiple birth were the strongest correlates of severe maternal morbidity in this population.

  • Racial disparities persisted across indicators of severe maternal morbidity.

  • Rates of disseminated intravascular coagulation were higher than those reported nationally.

Keywords

severe maternal morbidity - pregnancy complications - racial disparities - military

Note

I am a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part of my official duties. Title 17, USC. §105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, USC. §101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person's official duties.


Report no. 20–90 was supported by the U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery under work unit no. 60504. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government.


The study protocol was approved by the Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects. Research data were derived from an approved Naval Health Research Center, Institutional Review Board protocol, number: NHRC.1999.0003.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 05 March 2021

Accepted: 04 October 2021

Article published online:
10 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 2019 Demographics Report: Profile of the Military Community. Washington, DC: Department of Defense; 2019. . Accessed November 22, 2021 at https://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2019-demographics-report.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Englert RM, Yablonsky AM. Scoping review and gap analysis of research related to the health of women in the U.S. military, 2000 to 2015. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2019; 48 (01) 5-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Howland RE, Angley M, Won SH, Wilcox W, Searing H, Tsao TY. Estimating the hospital delivery costs associated with severe maternal morbidity in New York City, 2008–2012. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (02) 242-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chen HY, Chauhan SP, Blackwell SC. Severe maternal morbidity and hospital cost among hospitalized deliveries in the United States. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (13) 1287-1296
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zeitlin J, Egorova NN, Janevic T. et al. The impact of severe maternal morbidity on very preterm infant outcomes. J Pediatr 2019; 215: 56-63.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Silveira C, Parpinelli MA, Pacagnella RC. et al. A cohort study of functioning and disability among women after severe maternal morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016; 134 (01) 87-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reproductive health. Accessed July 24, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/smm/rates-severe-morbidity-indicator.htm
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe maternal morbidity in the United States. Accessed August 27, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/severematernalmorbidity.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lehavot K, Hoerster KD, Nelson KM, Jakupcak M, Simpson TL. Health indicators for military, veteran, and civilian women. Am J Prev Med 2012; 42 (05) 473-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Khodr ZG, Bukowinski AT, Hall C, Gumbs GR, Wells NY, Conlin AMS. The Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research program: assessing the reproductive health of U.S. active-duty women. Semin Reprod Med 2018; 36 (06) 351-360
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bukowinski AT, Conlin AMS, Gumbs GR, Khodr ZG, Chang RN, Faix DJ. Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Registry: select reproductive health outcomes, 2003-2014. MSMR 2017; 24 (11) 39-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gibson TCA, Young J, Karnell L, Coenen N. HCUP Methods Series. Impact of ICD-10-CM/PCS on research using administrative databases: Report # 2016–02. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2016-02.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Callaghan WM, Creanga AA, Kuklina EV. Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (05) 1029-1036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Main EK, Abreo A, McNulty J. et al. Measuring severe maternal morbidity: validation of potential measures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (05) 643.e1-643.e10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Creanga AA, Bateman BT, Kuklina EV, Callaghan WM. Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity: a multistate analysis, 2008-2010. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (05) 435.e1-435.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Admon LK, Winkelman TNA, Zivin K, Terplan M, Mhyre JM, Dalton VK. Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2012–2015. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (05) 1158-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hall C, Bukowinski AT, McGill AL. et al. Racial disparities in prenatal care utilization and infant small for gestational age among active duty US military women. Matern Child Health J 2020; 24 (07) 885-893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Zou GY, Donner A. Extension of the modified Poisson regression model to prospective studies with correlated binary data. Stat Methods Med Res 2013; 22 (06) 661-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gray KE, Wallace ER, Nelson KR, Reed SD, Schiff MA. Population-based study of risk factors for severe maternal morbidity. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012; 26 (06) 506-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Division of Vital Statistics (DVS). Natality public-use data on CDC WONDER Online Database, for years 2007–2019. Accessed June 15, 2020 at: https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality-current.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Callaghan WM, Kuklina EV, Berg CJ. Trends in postpartum hemorrhage: United States, 1994-2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (04) 353.e1-353.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Final Report to the Secretary of Defense: Military Health System Review. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense; 2014. . Accessed November 22, 2021 at: https://www.health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Access-Cost-Quality-and-Safety/MHS-Review
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Patterson JA, Roberts CL, Bowen JR. et al. Blood transfusion during pregnancy, birth, and the postnatal period. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (01) 126-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Defense health care: availability and quality measurement of women's care services in U.S. military hospitals. Accessed November 14, 2021 at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-16-596.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Leonard SA, Main EK, Carmichael SL. The contribution of maternal characteristics and cesarean delivery to an increasing trend of severe maternal morbidity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19 (01) 16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 López-de-Andrés A, Perez-Farinos N, Hernández-Barrera V. et al. A population-based study of diabetes during pregnancy in Spain (2009–2015): trends in incidence, obstetrics interventions, and pregnancy outcomes. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (02) 582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kuklina EV, Ayala C, Callaghan WM. Hypertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (06) 1299-1306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Meadows SO, Engel CC, Collins RL. et al. 2015 health related behaviors survey: physical health and functional limitations among U.S. active-duty service members. Accessed November 14, 2021 at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9955z4.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bornstein E, Eliner Y, Chervenak FA, Grünebaum A. Concerning trends in maternal risk factors in the United States: 1989–2018. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 29: 100657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Howell EA, Egorova N, Balbierz A, Zeitlin J, Hebert PL. Black-white differences in severe maternal morbidity and site of care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (01) 122.e1-122.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Huang Y, D'Alton ME, Wright JD. Hospital delivery volume, severe obstetrical morbidity, and failure to rescue. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (06) 795.e1-795.e14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Reid LD, Creanga AA. Severe maternal morbidity and related hospital quality measures in Maryland. J Perinatol 2018; 38 (08) 997-1008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Howell EA, Egorova NN, Janevic T. et al. Race and ethnicity, medical insurance, and within-hospital severe maternal morbidity disparities. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135 (02) 285-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Leonard SA, Main EK, Scott KA, Profit J, Carmichael SL. Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity prevalence and trends. Ann Epidemiol 2019; 33: 30-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lawton B, MacDonald EJ, Brown SA. et al. Preventability of severe acute maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (06) 557.e1-557.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Geller SE, Koch AR, Garland CE, MacDonald EJ, Storey F, Lawton B. A global view of severe maternal morbidity: moving beyond maternal mortality. Reprod Health 2018; 15 (98, suppl 1) 98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ozimek JA, Eddins RM, Greene N. et al. Opportunities for improvement in care among women with severe maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (04) 509.e1-509.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Himes KP, Bodnar LM. Validation of criteria to identify severe maternal morbidity. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2020; 34 (04) 408-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Lewkowitz AK, Rosenbloom JI, López JD. et al. Association between stillbirth at 23 weeks of gestation or greater and severe maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134 (05) 964-973
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wall-Wieler E, Carmichael SL, Gibbs RS. et al. Severe maternal morbidity among stillbirth and live birth deliveries in California. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134 (02) 310-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Henderson JT, Whitlock EP, O'Connor E, Senger CA, Thompson JH, Rowland MG. Low-dose aspirin for prevention of morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160 (10) 695-703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy. ACOG committee opinion no. 743. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132: e44-e52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar